There have been a couple of interesting discussions over the last couple of days on articles pertaining to piracy of e-books. (A lot of piracy-related articles here tend to grow interesting, long discussions—take this one, for instance.) They have brought in a lot of new readers—at least, we hope they’ll become new regular readers—who have raised a number of interesting points.

The City of Lost Wages

One common theme seems to be feeling deprived of income by pirates. Celine Chatillon wrote:

Every pirated book is a royalty (about 50 cents in most cases) that I do NOT earn. I’m unemployed and in poor health with no health insurance currently… I could have used the money from THOUSANDS of my books that were e-pirated through one pirate site alone (that I know of). These books were essentially stolen from me and my publishers.

But the thing is, how many of those thousands of books actually represent lost royalties? How many people sitting in the comfort of their homes browsing pirate sites would have decided to go out and buy the book if they couldn’t have gotten it free on-line? How many of them would have even bothered to click over to Amazon and order it without having to bestir their lazy butts from their chairs? Probably not many. (They’d probably just have pirated something else instead.)

I agree that even if lost money isn’t involved, piracy is certainly illegal and usually wrong. Authors should have the right to control how their works are disseminated. But in painting each download as a lost sale that would have meant money in their pocket, a lot of anti-pirate authors are fooling themselves, as well as totally failing to connect with any pirates who might otherwise be shown the error of their ways.

After all, the pirates know for a fact that they wouldn’t have bought the book anyway, so the author is not out any money they would otherwise have gotten from them. And using themselves as an example, they doubt any other downloaders would have either. So if that author is so out of touch with reality as to think they would, why should they believe anything else the author says about being hurt by piracy?

An Industry Perspective

There are also some appeals to authority going on as writers discount the opinions of non-publishing-industry folks for their lack of understanding from within the industry. Rowena Cherry writes:

Whenever apologists for those who infringe copyright produce their arguments, sooner or later they cite a professor, doctor, or some institution of higher learning.

The trouble with these folks is that they are not experts in piracy or e-publishing. They are not qualified to opine upon e-book piracy, in my opinion. They live by a different set of rules. They enjoy an educational exemption.

(She goes on to rail against the Chafee Amendment to the DMCA, which entitles non-profits who work with the blind to create and disseminate e-books to them without paying the authors, but that’s another matter that was addressed eight years ago by writer/editor Eric Flint.)

However, there are plenty of industry folks, writers and publishers, who would disagree with the positions these authors are taking. That’s not to say they’re necessarily right (or that these authors are), but they’re certainly not the ivory-tower academics of Ms. Cherry’s comment. So, here are a few examples:

Moira Rogers

Bree, half of the urban fantasy romance writing duo “Moira Rogers”, made a thorough post to their blog explaining why, even though they strongly dislike piracy, they feel that getting bothered enough to go out of their way to fight it is a waste of time they could otherwise spend writing more books that make them money.

I believe firmly that the only solution for piracy is the iTunes solution. Make it easy, affordable, and more convenient than piracy. No, that won’t stop piracy. Nothing will stop piracy. But it’s the first step in regaining some control of the situation. Lazy people will pay, and I’m speaking as a lazy person.

For now? I ignore piracy. (Mostly: I will discuss my exceptions later.) At this point I have no proof that piracy is hurting me. My sales are not going down–but they are slowly shifting to 3rd party venues. I believe that some epublished authors are not giving the growing 3rd party market enough consideration when they look at their first month’s sales totals and scream Oh no, piracy has ended my career!

Tim O’Reilly

And here’s a post from eight years ago by tech-book publisher Tim O’Reilly, that has often been quoted and re-quoted by others since then. O’Reilly famously referred to piracy as “progressive taxation” that might cost best-selling artists a few bucks but often brings considerably more attention to artists laboring in obscurity.

I have watched my 19 year-old daughter and her friends sample countless bands on Napster and Kazaa and, enthusiastic for their music, go out to purchase CDs. My daughter now owns more CDs than I have collected in a lifetime of less exploratory listening. What’s more, she has introduced me to her favorite music, and I too have bought CDs as a result. And no, she isn’t downloading Britney Spears, but forgotten bands from the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, as well as their musical forebears in other genres. This is music that is difficult to find — except online — but, once found, leads to a focused search for CDs, records, and other artifacts. eBay is doing a nice business with much of this material, even if the RIAA fails to see the opportunity.

O’Reilly puts his money where his mouth is. Like Baen, all O’Reilly e-books are sold DRM-free.

Eric Flint

And speaking of Baen, writer and editor Eric Flint has long been a proponent of giving things away free legitimately, and dismissive of the negative effects piracy (and other bugaboos, such as used bookstores and, gasp, libraries) is alleged to have. In fact, he’s written so much on the matter, between Prime Palaver and Salvos Against Big Brother, that it’s hard to pick out any one particular piece. But here’s part of a Salvos Against Big Brother column from 2007:

Yes, it’s irritating to authors to see their work posted up on the Internet without their permission, especially when the deed is accompanied by a virtual raspberry from a superannuated juvenile delinquent bragging about it. But the fact remains that the material damage done to authors by such activity is so minimal that it can barely be distinguished from zero— if there’s any material damage at all, which I doubt.

I am not guessing about this. The reason I initially put up my first novel for free online was because I got fed up reading the hysterical howls of some authors in online discussion groups, shrieking that their livelihood was being mortally threatened.

To prove that was nonsense, as graphically as I could, I put up one of my own novels for free. “Pirated myself,” if you’ll allow me the absurd expression. That novel, Mother of Demons, has been available online for free for almost seven years now. And . . .

It’s still in print, and still keeps selling.

Flint (along with his publisher, the late Jim Baen) followed this up by creating the Baen Free Library as an adjunct to Baen’s DRM-free low-cost Webscriptions program—and then coming up with the idea of binding CD-ROMs full of authors’ works into first-edition printings of selected hardcovers—and allowing them to be distributed for free.

One Baen fan even posts downloadable disk images and browseable directories of the CDs on his website—with permission. Many of these disks contain a majority or the entirety of the author’s other works—all available for free. Authors with giveaway CDs include Flint, David Weber, David Drake, and John Ringo. (It’s hard to imagine the Marxist Flint and the staunch conservative Ringo agreeing on anything at all, but they both see the value of giving away free e-books!) Even Lois M. Bujold, who was originally reluctant to participate in Baen’s freebies on the advice of her agent, has put (nearly) every Vorkosigan book on a free CD bound into her latest novel.

Oddly enough, Baen e-books are among the least often pirated of any mass-market books—because the pirates know they can already be had cheaply or freely by legitimate means.

Cory Doctorow

And Cory Doctorow is another author who is a proponent of giving it away for free. While some would say that Doctorow is one of those big-name writers whose reputation means he can afford to give e-books away for free, Doctorow got that reputation in the first place by…giving his books away for free. Before Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom, he was only known for being an offbeat pop-culture blogger on BoingBoing—which is well and good for people who read offbeat pop-culture blogs, but they aren’t necessarily the same people who buy books.

In an essay reprinted in his freely-given-away book Content, Doctorow writes:

There’s no empirical way to prove that giving away books sells more books–but I’ve done this with three novels and a short story collection (and I’ll be doing it with two more novels and another collection in the next year), and my books have consistently outperformed my publisher’s expectations. Comparing their sales to the numbers provided by colleagues suggests that they perform somewhat better than other books from similar writers at similar stages in their careers. But short of going back in time and re-releasing the same books under the same circumstances without the free e-book program, there’s no way to be sure.

What is certain is that every writer who’s tried giving away e-books to sell books has come away satisfied and ready to do it some more.

He also notes that SF fans are in general very affectionate toward books they like, and tend to be early adopters of new technologies.

Indeed, science fiction was the first form of widely pirated literature online, through “bookwarez” channels that contained books that had been hand-scanned, a page at a time, converted to digital text and proof-read. Even today, the mostly widely pirated literature online is SF.

Nothing could make me more sanguine about the future. As publisher Tim O’Reilly wrote in his seminal essay, Piracy is Progressive Taxation, “being well-enough known to be pirated [is] a crowning achievement.” I’d rather stake my future on a literature that people care about enough to steal than devote my life to a form that has no home in the dominant medium of the century.

Over the last couple of years, major bookseller Amazon has been giving away the first books in series for free on the Kindle, and publishers, agents, and authors are often finding that they act as “gateway drugs” for readers to buy the rest of the writers’ series. (Sound familiar? Oh hey, Baen Free Library!)

“Giving people a sample is a great way to hook people and encourage them to buy more,” said Suzanne Murphy, group publisher of Scholastic Trade Publishing, which offered free downloads of “Suite Scarlett,” a young-adult novel by Maureen Johnson, for three weeks in the hopes of building buzz for the next book in the series, “Scarlett Fever,” out in hardcover on Feb. 1. The book went as high as No. 3 on Amazon’s Kindle best-seller list.

And Amazon benefits, too—they also lure existing fans of those writers to the Kindle e-book platform. Of course, not all publishers are fans of this practice, including some who feel it “devalues” books. (Why is it that when publishers say something “devalues” books, what they really mean is they want customers to pay more than they already are? Did nobody teach them about the price-demand curve?)

Nathan Henrion

These Amazon giveaways have been good for more writers and publishers than just those who work with the Big Six. Earlier this year I mentioned Nathan Henrion, a midlist publisher, who reported big sales of later books in its series came from Amazon listing one of his titles for free.

Much of the talk by the big 6 publishers has been stress over cannibalization of print sales, or the idea of replacement sales, by ebooks. For midlist publishers such as ourselves, I believe we fight against substitution. We capture the “browser” market. If our title is not available or visible, a customer will simply substitute for another one in the genre. Free gave us the visibility that we could not purchase.

Janis Ian

Creative artists who have embraced piracy are not confined solely to the print publishing industry, either. Folk musician Janis Ian discovered that, thanks to piracy, her recordings were finding an entirely new audience.

My site gets an average of 75,000 hits a year. Not bad for someone whose last hit record was in 1975. When the original Napster was running full-tilt, we received about 100 hits a month from people who’d downloaded “Society’s Child” or “At Seventeen” for free, then decided they wanted more information. Of those 100 people (and these are only the ones who let us know how they’d found the site), 15 bought CDs. Not huge sales, right? No record company is interested in 180 extra sales a year. But… that translates into $2,700, which is a lot of money in my book. And that doesn’t include the ones who bought the CDs in stores, or who came to my shows.

And apparently her article (please forgive pun) struck a chord with the Internet audience. Even she was startled by the immense response it brought. And though she is talking about the music industry here, her further advice could translate to just about any content industry you care to name with a little search-and-replacing of words:

Do I still believe downloading is not harming the music industry? Yes, absolutely. Do I think consumers, once the industry starts making product they want to buy, will still buy, even though they can download? Yes. Water is free, but a lot of us drink bottled water because it tastes better. You can get coffee at the office, but you’re likely to go to Starbucks or the local espresso place and bring it back to the office with you, because that coffee tastes better. When record companies start making CD’s that offer consumers a reason to buy them, as illustrated by Kevin’s email at the end of this article, consumers will buy them. The songs may be free on line, but the CD’s will taste better.

Give It Away, Give It Away Now

And it’s not only anecdotal evidence, either. At the risk of taking a quick trip to an ivory tower, a BYU study has shown a correlation between free e-books and increases in sales in a lot of cases. (Oddly enough, the only case where there wasn’t an increase in sales was for the free e-books being given away by, who only made them available for limited times.)

I will grant that some of the above references are to giving books away for free intentionally, rather than piracy, but there really isn’t much difference in the two practices apart from intent. Either way, the book can be downloaded by anyone who cares enough to figure out how.

It probably does help sales more to give the book away for free on a site like the Baen Free Library where people can download it easily, without having to figure out how to jump through the right hoops to download it illegitimately. (And since I’ve started working phone tech support for a major computer service company, my estimate of the number of people smart enough to figure out how to download pirated e-books has gone way down.) But if letting everyone download for free doesn’t hurt, I find it hard to believe that letting just those who know how do so can hurt either.

Again, this is not to say that piracy is right. The decision of whether or not to give away a book should rest with its author. But the aforementioned authors, publishers, and musician—people who have real-world industry experience, and who make their living from their creative works, not “a professor, doctor, or some institution of higher learning” in the bunch (well, okay, except for that BYU study, but that’s just garnish)—find that it doesn’t actually hurt and in at least some cases helps. So, if piracy actually does help, the question of right or wrong may end up being irrelevant.


  1. I was a new reader who has become a regular reader, which is why I saw this in my feed this morning instead of in my blog stats. 😉

    On the topic of free sales creating new sales, I thought I’d leave another link. In June, my publisher did a kindle giveaway of one of our books, letting kindle users download it free for two weeks. The sales it drove toward the other books in the series was pretty remarkable. (I need to do an updated post, as well, because the benefits have far surpassed the first month I wrote about.)

  2. How about some words from Angela James, Executive Editor of Carina Press?

    Piracy is…a fact of life for the entertainment world, whether it’s movies, music, video games or books. Even before digital, we had different forms of piracy (bootleg records and movies, for instance) so I don’t foresee a world in publishing without piracy.

    But I think there are things we can do to decrease the instances of piracy, including providing books at reasonable prices, making them available to readers internationally, and making them easy to use (ie, not trying to have so many formats and forms of DRM (secure formats) that we make it impossible for the consumer to buy/use). Make them easy to find, easy to buy, easy to use and easy to say “Oh, that’s not too expensive” and I think you’ll have removed the reasons some people pirate and convert those “pirates” into paying customers.


  3. IF your books are available in print and IF it is available in brick and mortar stores and IF it is in a cheaper format like massmarket, the free ebook might help sales, but a vast majority of books available as ebooks are only available as ebooks or they are trade PODs which are more expensive than massmarkets as well as being only available by order.

    When the paper copies requires so many hoops to jump through to get a copy, the free ebook copy remains the only copy most readers want.

    Only a very small group of writers are currently successful enough to have paper copies available everywhere as well as the added income of audio books and other movie and media deals so they can thumb their noses at the extra income of ebooks. The rest of us make most of our income of ebooks.

    As people are more willing to read ebooks over paper and the brick and mortar bookstores continue to close shop, the value of free will fall considerably even for these people and publishers like Baen.

    According to numerous writer friends who have tried free, the only real value they’ve achieved with free is the first book of a long established series being given away. Free outside of a first of series tends to be far less successful in attracting readers to their back lists.

  4. Congratulations Moira. Smart and brave marketing and you got the benefits. There is nothing new of course about this kind of thing. Loss leaders have been with us for decade and will continue to be. Free tasters bring visitors, create interest, attract new consumers and create a buzz. It is a universal thing.
    As eRetailers learn how to adapt classic marketing methods to this new industry they will benefit in the way that you have. People are always looking for something new, something different. People do enjoy the best sellers but most feel that they are being manipulated by the over focussing on those books. By reducing the barrier to trying new things, new customers get to try your product and if it is good then sales rise. Best of luck.

  5. Howard said: Loss leaders have been with us for decade and will continue to be. Free tasters bring visitors, create interest, attract new consumers and create a buzz. It is a universal thing.

    Exactly. It’s a very common strategy. I will confess that I see a slight difference between giving away a book through a retailer and having one available on a pirate site. On one site, people are presumably there to buy. On the other, they’re presumably there NOT to buy.

    In the end, though, all I can do is control the things I can control, and hope that some of the factors that drove someone to illegal download my book disappear at some point in the future, and if they enjoyed the book, they might feel the urge to support me by buying a copy.

    I think, however, that the likelihood of someone choosing to buy my books decreases drastically if I’ve called them horrible names or thrown a toddler-style temper tantrum in the meantime. 😉

  6. Moira this is a discussion topic that should be far more frequently highlighted rather than the emotional obsession with piracy, because this is the way forward in a world where piracy is here to stay. Your point about the difference between a retail and a piracy site is interesting but consider this … leave out the ‘buy’ part and focus on what the visitor is doing. He is looking for something, otherwise he would not be there. In a retail environment, on your web site for example, he is thinking about reading. You make it really really easy for him to say to himself.. ‘maybe this writer is worth trying out, and it won’t cost me anything, and it’s a quick download unhindered by DRM etc etc’. On the piracy site the visitor is looking for something too and when he finds one book that interests him, what do you think the chances of him downloading a load of other titles ?.. no cost, no DRM, juts a click. I am not saying the situation is the same…. but not so different either 🙂 It’s about lowering the barrier, lowering the amount of effort to acquire what he wants. (He + She of course)
    I am convinced that writers like you can benefit a huge amount from what you are doing. Your article indicates almost 3,000 people deciding to buy your book that did not consider it previously. You now have a greatly expanded reader base, with friends and family and work colleagues, and though not everyone will want more, there is a much bigger chance that they will.
    I also believe that giving readers the chance to interact with the author and the site and each other is another path to expanding a read base that is only having it’s surface scratched. I hope Samhain Publishing looks to discussion forums soon.

    By the way I love the profile of “Bree and Donna” on the Samhain Publishing web site, not mention the covers 🙂

  7. I can see your side and my side, probably because I’m young enough to not clearly remember a time when I couldn’t download pretty much anything I wanted from the internet. (And I’m old enough to know that illegal downloading is hardly new, because I’m not THAT young.)

    However, it is hard for me to leave out the buy part! If I’m not thinking about sales and keeping an eye on the bottom line, I’m a poor business woman. I think the financial return on the free copies on amazon vastly surpasses the financial return on the illegally downloaded copies–in this case I’ll say it almost has to, or else I would have incredible numbers every day.

    That said, I honestly do believe that the small financial returns I might get on illegal downloads might be enough to balance out any sales I might be losing. I also think I get a different sort of return there–the recognition & expanding fan base return, and while it’s not going to immediately translate into sales, it may in the future. As long as my sales don’t seem to be tanking in direct correlation with a rise in illegal downloads (which they aren’t) then I figure it all evens out in the end.

    At the heart of it, I often think part of the problem is that many authors don’t understand piracy. Maybe there’s a generation gap at work, or a techie vs non-techie assumption gap. In fact, this statement of Chris’ rang very true for me:

    “After all, the pirates know for a fact that they wouldn’t have bought the book anyway, so the author is not out any money they would otherwise have gotten from them. And using themselves as an example, they doubt any other downloaders would have either. So if that author is so out of touch with reality as to think they would, why should they believe anything else the author says about being hurt by piracy?”

    I truly, truly wish authors wouldn’t lead every debate with this, for exactly this reason. There ARE reasons that I am bothered by downloaders, but the conversation is so derailed by claims of having lost $923,234,012 dollars in imaginary royalties that no one wants to listen. And I don’t blame them! I don’t want to listen either.

    It’s really been fun chatting over here though. I spend most of my time biting my tongue so I won’t start fights, so I NEVER get to discuss downloading. (Or actual piracy, which I wish I had properly defined in my original post. There is a serious problem with people reselling ebooks over and over again, and that does divert sales and confuse readers who think they’re giving money to the author.)

  8. Curse you Jeff Bezos and all your Amazonian minions!

    I got a free mystery book “Billy Boyle” for my Kindle. By the time I was finished with my electronic orgy of mystery reading, I’d spent basket of Jacksons at Amazon buying the author’s entire catalog.


    Jack Tingle

  9. The books of mine that are legally available as e-books sell for $2.50 and $2.99. They are –or were– pirated. When, as an experiment, I sold one of them at $0.99 it was still pirated.

    Therefore, I tend not to believe those who say that price is an issue.

    There’s no DRM on my legally published books. Still, they are pirated. The book I sell on Jexbo is available to anyone who can use PayPal. Still it is pirated.

    I don’t believe that every download represents a lost sale. I do believe that some of the people requesting my books on pirate sites might have borrowed my books from a library at no cost to themselves, if they couldn’t obtain a bootlegged copy over the internet.

  10. Those who disdain copyright laws tend to misrepresent what is said by those asserting the value of copyright protections.

    From the Copyright Office:
    “What is mandatory deposit?
    Mandatory deposit (17 U.S.C. section 407) requires the owner of copyright or of the exclusive right of distribution to deposit in the U.S. Copyright Office for the use of the Library of Congress two complete copies of the best edition within 3 months after a work is published. Copies of all works under copyright protection that have been published or distributed in the United States must be deposited with the Copyright Office within 3 months of the date of first publication. (See Copyright Office Circular 7d, Mandatory Deposit of Copies or Phonorecords for the Library of Congress, and the Deposit Regulation 202.19.) Electing not to register your copyright in the work with the Copyright Office”

    My Chafee Amendment remarks (hardly “railing against”) dealt with the fact that the loc already has copies of all copyrighted works for its own use, therefore it should not be necessary for “volunteers” to scan books of their choice at random.

  11. Chris,

    One minor clarification: as the guy who runs the The Fifth Imperium CD archive, I just want to point out that I am neither a current nor past employee of Baen.

    I’m simply an interested third party that Baen allows to host their CDs.

  12. No problem.

    I’ve seen it mentioned in several places, myself.

    Most of those comments were old enough to be weird replying to.

    Most people parlay my close association and ‘multiple-killin’ as being an employee. Not sure why.

The TeleRead community values your civil and thoughtful comments. We use a cache, so expect a delay. Problems? E-mail