3

MIT machineOuch! Despite muscle relaxants and an ergonomic desk and chair, my left arm still hurts like hell. I’m going to paste in slightly tweaked passage from an email I wrote to Richard Bellaver at Ball State University, a well-regarded usabilty expert.

Here’s some research that I hope a usability maven will undertake with a qualified medical expert. Why not study the ergonomics of laptops vs. tablets, especially for K-12?

I love the idea of the $100 MIT laptop computer, but think that laptops suck ergnomically. The ideal eye-screen distance may be at odds with the keyboard-user distance for typing. At least two-three decades ago, people knew about the benefits of detachable keyboards. We need to preach and practice the old-time ergnomics religion. To me, the optimal hardware by far would be a tablet propped up by a height-adjustable stand, with a detachable keyboard in use. I hope that the MIT laptop will have an alternative to the built-in keyboard–and will work with a USB detachable keyboard.

Details: Yes, I’m aware that laptops can reduce the strain on kids’ backs from carrying books. But why replace one ergonomic evil with another? I’m a big booster of the MIT project. I just want to see it done right. For the curious, I myself have gotten into trouble even with a desktop. Rx: More breaks.

Note: I should add that apparently the MIT machine can function as a tablet. True? If so, the wire-stand approach could be just the ticket.

 
3