The Financial Times is not backing down from its high-profile fight with Apple, even after the software maker relaxed its controversial subscription policy.

On Tuesday, the FT announced its iPad app was “moving” to the open web. The HTML5-powered, download-free web app is every bit as functional as the native app, but the FT gets to maintain total control over subscription pricing and subscriber data — at the cost of the promotional platform of Apple’s App Store.

Under Apple’s new set of rules, it will no longer require pricing parity — that is, the old rule that a subscription in the App Store must cost the same (or less) than it does everywhere else. Apple will also allow publishers to sell subscriptions only outside of the store, eliminating the requirement that they must be sold through Apple as well.

But there’s still one problem that will keep the FT from embracing Apple’s new system, Rule 11.13:

11.13 Apps that link to external mechanisms for purchases or subscriptions to be used in the app, such as a “buy” button that goes to a web site to purchase a digital book, will be rejected

In other words, apps are prohibited from linking to outside subscription sites. The FT could advertise subscriptions on its website and then direct users to the app — but not the other way around. The FT considers that unacceptable and said the app that would result would be a “dumb app.”

“The fact remains that the publication still wouldn’t be able to sell subscriptions within an app using our own system, so all we’d be allowed to do is offer an app — that’s what they called dumb — for subscribers who purchase it somewhere else,” said Tom Glover, a Financial Times spokesman.

That restriction could impact other news apps as well. The current version of theNew York Times iPad app, for example, employs its own subscription system. Tap “Subscribe Now” and an NYT webpage pops up. That would not seem to be allowed under Apple’s new rules. As Josh explained earlier, the ease and ubiquity of one-tap purchasing, tied to 225 million credit cards, is a powerful incentive to play by Apple’s rules.

The FT, with a loyal niche audience, appears willing to go its own way. What remains to be seen is whether Apple would pull the FT’s existing iPad app from its store or refuse to approve future app updates. The FT has said there are “no plans to pull out of any apps store,” and an update pushed out yesterday suggests the app is still being developed.

Via Neiman Journalism Lab

Unless otherwise noted, all content on this site is © the President and Fellows of Harvard College or the content’s original author.

Creative Commons License

Also unless otherwise noted, all content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

1 COMMENT

  1. I believe I mentioned in past comments how I had at least one friend who freaked out about using an in-app ‘purchase’ button on an app that used a proprietary purchase system, and not having it read the iTunes info. Being prompted to enter credit card information in the app worried them, as did the purchase then not showing up in their ‘in app purchase’ history in their iTunes account tab. I actually got a phonecall from them, all concerned that the application had stolen their credit card data!

    This is a better solution from both sides; if you have a purchase button in your app to buy content for that app, it will work as people expect. But you’re free to do whatever works best for you if you prefer to keep it all on the website. And the pricing restrictions — while it made it easier for users to know that they didn’t have to price hunt — were a needlessly complicating factor.

    I was fairly convinced when the changes were first announced that, while Apple wasn’t going to say ‘no’ to extra money, the motive behind the in-app purchase restrictions was intended primarily for UI and ease-of-use reasons. I’m glad to see this new decision backing up that gut feeling.

The TeleRead community values your civil and thoughtful comments. We use a cache, so expect a delay. Problems? E-mail newteleread@gmail.com.