- TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics - http://www.teleread.com -

McGraw-Hill: We don’t need no education publishers

Posted By Aggregated Content On November 30, 2012 @ 12:21 pm In education,textbooks | 1 Comment

 

By Andy Richardson, CEO of Influential Software

[1]It’s a case of another week, another publishing takeover. This week, McGraw-Hill announced that it was offloading its education publishing business [2], though this time not to another publisher. The private equity arm of investment firm Apollo Global Management [3] will take control of the textbook publisher, which has undershot its revenue targets in seven of the last eight quarters and has been on the market for a year.

Apollo’s decision to invest nearly $2.5 billion in the company is a signal that the money men believe there’s still a lot of profit to be made from educational publishing. What’s less clear, however, is whether Apollo’s vision for its acquisition is in line with its current management’s thinking. McGraw-Hill has openly acknowledged that educational publishing is in a period of transition, and its management have been furiously seeking to reposition the company as “Netflix for textbooks [4]”. They’re betting heavily on subscription-based access to textbooks and learning materials providing a more consistent stream of revenue than the present business model, which is shrinking as schools and colleges cut their budgets.

[5]Apollo Global ManagementBuying an educational publisher is something of a departure for Apollo (BPP and some universities in the Americas to one side), which is best known in the UK for its investment in the high-street fashion brand Claire’s Accessories [6]. Its other principal private equity investments include companies in chemical, electronics and component manufacturing, which shed little light onto what Apollo’s plans are for its new buy. What we can confidently expect, though, is a renewed focus on profit for McGraw-Hill’s former education publishing activities. As private equity buy-outs are frequently highly leveraged, bought-out companies must service it through cutting their costs and returning higher profits. And to give some idea of the level of returns an Apollo acquisition needs to deliver, look no further than the $250 million of company debt that Apollo has agreed to pay McGraw-Hill to complete the transaction. These command an annual interest rate of 8.5 percent.

This challenge, when set against McGraw-Hill’s recent financial statements (its most recent quarterly earnings posted an 11 percent dip in revenue and 20 percent slide in profits for the educational publishing division) underline the scale of the task in hand. Nor are the signs elsewhere in the sector particularly encouraging. Cengage [7]—the U.S.’s number two textbook publisher—was acquired by two private equity houses, Apax Partners [8] and (due to the required Canadian involvement) OMERS [9] in 2007, and has also seen profits and earnings slide, highlighted in the latest Q1 results [10]. One wonders whether Cengage’s rumored interest in acquiring McGraw-Hill for itself may have been a distraction that impacted this very performance.

What we may well see here over the coming months and years is a clash of wills between the idea men and the money men. Might the technology and publishing evangelists indeed push through a new vision for education publishing? Will they secure the investment they need to break the textbook paradigm and establish a nice, steady stream of subscription income for Apollo? As a long-term vision it’s a tantalising one. There are more than a few textbook publishers who believe a journal-style subscription model could be the savior of their businesses. On the other hand, establishing a new business model takes time and money—and maybe too much money for a private equity house that needs to stay focused on engineering profit in order to keep its own investors happy.

It’s much too early to tell how this deal will pan out, but in a market where upstart companies like Boundless and even Apple are all clamoring to disrupt the formerly cozy textbook business, it’s safe to say that it will be interesting. We just have to hope that at least one of the textbook giants has the nerve, the cash, and the right backing to see it through the great digital disruption.

* * *

About Andy Richardson & Influential Software:

[11]Influential Software [12] is an IT consultancy set up by founder and CEO Andy Richardson in 1993. It has 35 staff in the UK, with offices in London and the South East. The company has been working with businesses across all sectors for 20 years on scores of successful projects that range from enterprise-level business intelligence and data-warehousing to ERP solutions, vendor selection exercises, bespoke software development and the supply of skilled contract staff.


1 Comment (Open | Close)

1 Comment To "McGraw-Hill: We don’t need no education publishers"

#1 Comment By Frank Lowney On November 30, 2012 @ 2:08 pm

Lots of good insights here but I would not be as optimistic about the prospects for rejuvenation in commercial academic publishing. The Netflix analogy evidences a fundamental misunderstanding. Not everyone can make and distribute even a B grade movie, let alone a blockbuster. Digital textbooks, OTOH, can be made and distributed by anyone who has the content expertise. Just today, Rice University’s OpenStax College imprint announced College Physics for $4.99 in the iBookstore. Here’s the URL:
[13]

The idea behind LearnSmart is not really new. It’ s a vendor lock-in scheme similar to bundling paper textbooks with Learning Management System (LMS) access codes that expire at the end of the term. It just flips the formula from pTextbook with an LMS lock-in to an LMS with an eTextbook lock-in. Most of these enhancements are to make teaching easier and thus to convince the professor to adopt the textbook, now LMS with textbook built-in.

The professor selects, the student pays. It’s the same old broken market that has contributed so much to driving up the cost of a college education, raised questions about the ROI of college and now threatens to endanger any institutions that persist in this exploitation. Alternatives with credentialing are on the rise.

Unless they come up with better ideas than these, Apollo shareholders are not going to be happy campers.


Article printed from TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics: http://www.teleread.com

URL to article: http://www.teleread.com/textbooks/mcgraw-hill-we-dont-need-no-education-publishers/

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: http://www.teleread.com/textbooks/mcgraw-hill-we-dont-need-no-education-publishers/attachment/mcgraw-hill/

[2] McGraw-Hill announced that it was offloading its education publishing business: http://investorplace.com/2012/11/mcgraw-hill-finally-hocks-education-division/

[3] Apollo Global Management: http://www.agm.com/Home.aspx

[4] Netflix for textbooks: http://gigaom.com/2012/11/26/mcgraw-hill-sells-off-education-unit-for-2-5b/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pcorg+(paidContent)

[5] Image: http://www.teleread.com/textbooks/mcgraw-hill-we-dont-need-no-education-publishers/attachment/pxy_47199622_43681456/

[6] Claire’s Accessories: http://www.claires.com/store/

[7] Cengage: http://www.cengage.com/us/

[8] Apax Partners: http://www.apax.com/

[9] OMERS: http://www.omers.com/

[10] profits and earnings slide, highlighted in the latest Q1 results: http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=34765897

[11] Image: http://www.teleread.com/textbooks/mcgraw-hill-we-dont-need-no-education-publishers/attachment/andy/

[12] Influential Software: http://www.influentialsoftware.com/

[13] : https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/college-physics/id575595601?mt=13

Copyright © 2010 TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home. All rights reserved.