<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics &#187; legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/tag/legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:45:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is anyone still paying attention to the DOJ/ebook antitrust case?</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/legal/is-anyone-still-paying-attention-to-the-dojebook-antitrust-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/legal/is-anyone-still-paying-attention-to-the-dojebook-antitrust-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Expo America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price fixing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=85257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;d forgotten. Now that all the the publishing players have settled, abandoning agency pricing and returning to the wholesale slums, the DOJ/e-book antitrust case, which popped up again in everyone&#8217;s news feeds this week, feels a little anticlimactic. The DOJ, perhaps simply because it&#8217;s what it found, or perhaps because there&#8217;s no one [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/legal/is-anyone-still-paying-attention-to-the-dojebook-antitrust-case/">Is anyone still paying attention to the DOJ/ebook antitrust case?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/legal/is-anyone-still-paying-attention-to-the-dojebook-antitrust-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Macmillan Finalizes E-Book Settlement</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/legal/macmillan-finalizes-e-book-settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/legal/macmillan-finalizes-e-book-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Juli Monroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macmillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-book settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Cote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juli Monroe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=84162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re finally nearing the end of this saga. Yesterday, Publishers Weekly reported that Macmillan has finalized their e-book settlement with the state and consumer classes. The agreement has been sent to Judge Cote, who is expected to approve it. The final total for Macmillan was $26 million, $20 million of which is earmarked for consumer compensation. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/legal/macmillan-finalizes-e-book-settlement/">Macmillan Finalizes E-Book Settlement</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/legal/macmillan-finalizes-e-book-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the ReDigi case might mean for Amazon&#8217;s used content plans</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/legal/what-the-redigi-case-might-mean-for-amazons-used-content-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/legal/what-the-redigi-case-might-mean-for-amazons-used-content-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanna Cabot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digitize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joanna Cabot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReDigi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=82447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Numerous websites have been reporting on the latest twist in the ReDigi case (for example, here on Paid Content). The case sets an important potential precedent for other business plans involving the sale of digital content. I know Amazon has contemplated a move into this area, and I wonder if they might be the ones with [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/legal/what-the-redigi-case-might-mean-for-amazons-used-content-plans/">What the ReDigi case might mean for Amazon&#8217;s used content plans</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/legal/what-the-redigi-case-might-mean-for-amazons-used-content-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona bill looks to add e-book readers to library privacy law</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/arizona-bill-looks-to-add-e-book-readers-to-library-privacy-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/arizona-bill-looks-to-add-e-book-readers-to-library-privacy-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Susan Lulgjuraj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[associated press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library privacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Lulgjuraj]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=82064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As e-books emerge as more and more of a popular medium, politicians have to look at new ways of protecting citizens. When many laws were enacted, even decades ago, they were written without much consideration for future digital endeavors. Arizona is the most recent to state to look at e-books, and to move to protect [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/arizona-bill-looks-to-add-e-book-readers-to-library-privacy-law/">Arizona bill looks to add e-book readers to library privacy law</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/arizona-bill-looks-to-add-e-book-readers-to-library-privacy-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does the SCOTUS&#8217; Wiley v. Kirtsaeng decision mean for books, publishing?</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/what-does-the-scotus-wiley-v-kirtsaeng-decision-mean-for-publishing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/what-does-the-scotus-wiley-v-kirtsaeng-decision-mean-for-publishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Shapiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supap Kirtsaeng]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=81797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By now you&#8217;ve likely heard that the Supreme Court has ruled, in a 6-3 decision, in favor of immigrant scientist Supap Kirtsaeng in Kirtsaeng V. Wiley. In what&#8217;s being heralded as a win for consumers and libraries, and a loss for publishers, the SCOTUS overturned a previous ruling against Kirtsaeng, who had been buying textbooks printed (legally) abroad—where [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/what-does-the-scotus-wiley-v-kirtsaeng-decision-mean-for-publishing/">What does the SCOTUS&#8217; Wiley v. Kirtsaeng decision mean for books, publishing?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/what-does-the-scotus-wiley-v-kirtsaeng-decision-mean-for-publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Class Action Lawsuit Against Amazon and Publishers Misses the Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/amazon/class-action-lawsuit-against-amazon-and-publishers-misses-the-mark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/amazon/class-action-lawsuit-against-amazon-and-publishers-misses-the-mark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Juli Monroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Six lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Six publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boing Boing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cory doctorow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital rights management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HuffPo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juli Monroe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=79481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to the Huffington Post, three independent bookstores are filing a class action suit against Amazon and the &#8220;Big Six&#8221; publishers. Alyson Decker of Blecher &#38; Collins PC, lead counsel acting for the bookstores, described DRM as &#8220;a problem that affects many independent bookstores.&#8221; She said the complaint is still in the process of being served [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/amazon/class-action-lawsuit-against-amazon-and-publishers-misses-the-mark/">Class Action Lawsuit Against Amazon and Publishers Misses the Mark</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/amazon/class-action-lawsuit-against-amazon-and-publishers-misses-the-mark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ Approves Penguin Random House Merger</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/random-house/doj-approves-penguin-random-house-merger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/random-house/doj-approves-penguin-random-house-merger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Juli Monroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Penguin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juli Monroe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overdrive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penguin Random House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=78969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One hurdle down. Several more to go with the EU, Canadian Competition Bureau and various other antitrust authorities around the world still needing to weigh in on this. Penguin&#8217;s settlement with the Justice Department was a move to smooth the way for this merger, and it looks like that move worked. Note that Random House, [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/random-house/doj-approves-penguin-random-house-merger/">DOJ Approves Penguin Random House Merger</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/random-house/doj-approves-penguin-random-house-merger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BREAKING: Macmillan Settles with DOJ on Price Fixing</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/macmillan-settles-with-doj-over-price-fixing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/macmillan-settles-with-doj-over-price-fixing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Juli Monroe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macmillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ ebook case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-book price fixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hachette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HarperCollins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Sargent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juli Monroe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penguin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers lunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon & Schuster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=78399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Apple is now the lone hold-out. As you may recall, three publishers—Hachette, HarperCollins and Simon &#38; Schuster—immediately settled, leaving Penguin, MacMillan and Apple to fight it out in court. Penguin settled in December, probably to protect their pending merger with Random House. And now Macmillan joins its fellows. Macmillan CEO John Sargent cited financial reasons [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/macmillan-settles-with-doj-over-price-fixing/">BREAKING: Macmillan Settles with DOJ on Price Fixing</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/macmillan-settles-with-doj-over-price-fixing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court First Sale Doctrine case could give boost to resale-proof digital media sales</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/supreme-court-first-sale-doctrine-case-could-give-boost-to-resale-proof-digital-media-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/supreme-court-first-sale-doctrine-case-could-give-boost-to-resale-proof-digital-media-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Wiley & Sons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReDigi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[used books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[used games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[used media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=73892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ars Technica has a couple of great, in-depth pieces laying out in detail the facts of the matter surrounding the upcoming Supreme Court case concerning a Thai exchange student who imported and resold cheap foreign editions of English-language textbooks to finance his doctorate. Publishers contend he earned $1.2 million in revenues, and essentially set himself up as an unlicensed [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/supreme-court-first-sale-doctrine-case-could-give-boost-to-resale-proof-digital-media-sales/">Supreme Court First Sale Doctrine case could give boost to resale-proof digital media sales</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/supreme-court-first-sale-doctrine-case-could-give-boost-to-resale-proof-digital-media-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Jobs biographer does not have to turn over unpublished material to agency pricing class-action plaintiffs</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/steve-jobs-biographer-does-not-have-to-turn-over-unpublished-material-to-agency-pricing-class-action-plaintiffs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/steve-jobs-biographer-does-not-have-to-turn-over-unpublished-material-to-agency-pricing-class-action-plaintiffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Meadows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denise Cote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Cote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/steve-jobs-biographer-does-not-have-to-turn-over-unpublished-material-to-agency-pricing-class-action-plaintiffs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you’re interested in any new tidbit of information about the legal matters surrounding the publishers’ and Apple’s implementation of agency pricing, here’s an interesting one for you. Publishers Weekly reports that Denise Cote, the judge in the class-action suit against Apple and the publishers, has ruled that Walter Isaacson, the the author of the [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/steve-jobs-biographer-does-not-have-to-turn-over-unpublished-material-to-agency-pricing-class-action-plaintiffs/">Steve Jobs biographer does not have to turn over unpublished material to agency pricing class-action plaintiffs</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/steve-jobs-biographer-does-not-have-to-turn-over-unpublished-material-to-agency-pricing-class-action-plaintiffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian fair dealing ruling may expand scope of fair use in Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/canadian-fair-dealing-ruling-may-expand-scope-of-fair-use-in-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/canadian-fair-dealing-ruling-may-expand-scope-of-fair-use-in-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Meadows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/canadian-fair-dealing-ruling-may-expand-scope-of-fair-use-in-canada/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Personanondata has a look at a recent legal decision in Canada’s Supreme Court concerning “fair dealing” (what we call “fair use”) as it applied to music and educational material—similar to the recent Georgia University ruling in the US. One particular point the judge made is that it’s unrealistic to expect universities to purchase entire copies [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/canadian-fair-dealing-ruling-may-expand-scope-of-fair-use-in-canada/">Canadian fair dealing ruling may expand scope of fair use in Canada</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/canadian-fair-dealing-ruling-may-expand-scope-of-fair-use-in-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google files motion for summary judgment, insists Google Books is fair use, has not harmed any book sales</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/google-files-motion-for-summary-judgment-insists-google-books-is-fair-use-has-not-harmed-any-book-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/google-files-motion-for-summary-judgment-insists-google-books-is-fair-use-has-not-harmed-any-book-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 03:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors Guild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Meadows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Book Settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Chin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/google-files-motion-for-summary-judgment-insists-google-books-is-fair-use-has-not-harmed-any-book-sales/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>PaidContent has a copy of Google’s motion for summary judgment, and a summary of what it says. Google makes the case that its scanning of all those copyrighted books qualifies as fair use, and cites numerous examples of beneficial outcomes that have come out of the availability of that information to be searched. It also [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/google-files-motion-for-summary-judgment-insists-google-books-is-fair-use-has-not-harmed-any-book-sales/">Google files motion for summary judgment, insists Google Books is fair use, has not harmed any book sales</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/google-files-motion-for-summary-judgment-insists-google-books-is-fair-use-has-not-harmed-any-book-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Authors sue Harlequin over e-book royalties</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/authors-sue-harlequin-over-e-book-royalties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/authors-sue-harlequin-over-e-book-royalties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Meadows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harlequin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/authors-sue-harlequin-over-e-book-royalties/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The public may now be developing a love affair with e-books, but they may have lost their romance for some of Harlequin’s authors. Three such authors are suing Harlequin over a matter of miscalculated e-book royalties. Barbara Keiler, Mona Kay Thomas and Linda Barrett allege (PDF) that Harlequin used a tax-purposes subsidiary, Harlequin Swiss, to [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/authors-sue-harlequin-over-e-book-royalties/">Authors sue Harlequin over e-book royalties</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/authors-sue-harlequin-over-e-book-royalties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Commission investigates France, Luxembourg for illegally lowering VAT on e-books</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/european-commission-investigates-france-luxembourg-for-illegally-lowering-vat-on-e-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/european-commission-investigates-france-luxembourg-for-illegally-lowering-vat-on-e-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Meadows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/european-commission-investigates-france-luxembourg-for-illegally-lowering-vat-on-e-books/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Remember how Amazon has based its European operations in Luxembourg due to that country’s lower value-added tax rate on e-books? And France has reduced its own rate? Today the European Commission served notice that it was launching an investigation into whether these countries had broken European Union law by reducing those rates. The first step [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/european-commission-investigates-france-luxembourg-for-illegally-lowering-vat-on-e-books/">European Commission investigates France, Luxembourg for illegally lowering VAT on e-books</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/european-commission-investigates-france-luxembourg-for-illegally-lowering-vat-on-e-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nine major independent publishers object to DoJ price-fixing settlement</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/nine-major-independent-publishers-object-to-doj-price-fixing-settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/nine-major-independent-publishers-object-to-doj-price-fixing-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Meadows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indie Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price fixing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/nine-major-independent-publishers-object-to-doj-price-fixing-settlement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Atlantic reports on a new 20-page legal brief objecting to the terms of the Department of Justice settlement, filed by nine major independent publishers: Abrams Books, Chronicle Books, Grove/Atlantic Inc. Chicago Review Press, Inc, New Directions Publishing Corp., W.W. Norton &#38; Company, Perseus Books Group, the Rowman &#38; Littlefield Publishing Group, and Workman Publishing. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/nine-major-independent-publishers-object-to-doj-price-fixing-settlement/">Nine major independent publishers object to DoJ price-fixing settlement</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.teleread.com">TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/nine-major-independent-publishers-object-to-doj-price-fixing-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 1604/1905 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2013-05-23 04:08:58 -->