<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Many Americans Are Regular Readers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/reading-2/how-many-americans-are-regular-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/reading-2/how-many-americans-are-regular-readers/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilynn Byerly</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/reading-2/how-many-americans-are-regular-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-1236888</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilynn Byerly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=78008#comment-1236888</guid>
		<description>Kids need an encyclopedia in the house?  Encyclopedias are so twenty years ago.

The two best ways to make kids readers is to have at least one parent who read to them when they were little and who is a reader as an example.

Also, giving kids books they are interested in helps.

I had parents who read, but I didn&#039;t become a serious reader until I checked out a horse book from the school library.  The rest, as they say, is history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kids need an encyclopedia in the house?  Encyclopedias are so twenty years ago.</p>
<p>The two best ways to make kids readers is to have at least one parent who read to them when they were little and who is a reader as an example.</p>
<p>Also, giving kids books they are interested in helps.</p>
<p>I had parents who read, but I didn&#8217;t become a serious reader until I checked out a horse book from the school library.  The rest, as they say, is history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lowney</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/reading-2/how-many-americans-are-regular-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-1236853</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Lowney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=78008#comment-1236853</guid>
		<description>There is also the problem of how the definition of terms affects research results.  Should we define reading in terms of books read (cover to cover) and then conclude that most Americans don&#039;t read?  Books read as a proxy for &quot;reading&quot; is not as good a metric as it used to be.  In the digital era, a person can read voraciously and never complete a book or even start one.  
For example, it may happen that textbooks disappear from schools entirely.  Publishers are currently working assiduously on bringing traditional textbook content into Learning Management Systems and adding all sorts of features such as adaptive drill and practice, summative evaluation and so on.  This could just as easily happen to fiction as to non-fiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also the problem of how the definition of terms affects research results.  Should we define reading in terms of books read (cover to cover) and then conclude that most Americans don&#8217;t read?  Books read as a proxy for &#8220;reading&#8221; is not as good a metric as it used to be.  In the digital era, a person can read voraciously and never complete a book or even start one.<br />
For example, it may happen that textbooks disappear from schools entirely.  Publishers are currently working assiduously on bringing traditional textbook content into Learning Management Systems and adding all sorts of features such as adaptive drill and practice, summative evaluation and so on.  This could just as easily happen to fiction as to non-fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carmen webster buxton</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/reading-2/how-many-americans-are-regular-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-1236735</link>
		<dc:creator>carmen webster buxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 04:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=78008#comment-1236735</guid>
		<description>That Infographic says that &quot;light from the screen of ebooks and tablets is harmful...&quot; Clearly, the person who created this knows nothing about ebooks, as they are are merely books in digital form. They are not devices at all, and therefore do not have screens; ereaders have screens, but if they are e-ink screens, they do not emit ANY light.  Further, some ereaders can download books via 3G connections, and do not require either a computer or Internet access. 

Kind of hard for me to take anything else it says seriously once its credibility is shot like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Infographic says that &#8220;light from the screen of ebooks and tablets is harmful&#8230;&#8221; Clearly, the person who created this knows nothing about ebooks, as they are are merely books in digital form. They are not devices at all, and therefore do not have screens; ereaders have screens, but if they are e-ink screens, they do not emit ANY light.  Further, some ereaders can download books via 3G connections, and do not require either a computer or Internet access. </p>
<p>Kind of hard for me to take anything else it says seriously once its credibility is shot like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Eldridge</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/reading-2/how-many-americans-are-regular-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-1236686</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Eldridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=78008#comment-1236686</guid>
		<description>Thanks Vonda, you&#039;re right - I goofed on that one! I appreciate the close read,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Vonda, you&#8217;re right &#8211; I goofed on that one! I appreciate the close read,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vonda Z</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/reading-2/how-many-americans-are-regular-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-1236679</link>
		<dc:creator>Vonda Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=78008#comment-1236679</guid>
		<description>&quot;only 32 percent of adults over the age of 18 said they’d read somewhere between one and five books in the previous 12 months. In other words, 68 percent of the respondents—which is roughly two-thirds—hadn’t even read one single book in the past year.&quot;

Not so, unless you are looking at different data than I am. The chart on page 19 of the PDF (titled Book Reading Trends Over Time) did indeed state that 32% of adults over the age of 18 read 1-5 books in the last twelve months, however, it also states that only 19% read none (not 68% as you stated). 15% read 6-10 books; 26%, 11-50; and 5% over 50. (The remaining 3% either didn&#039;t know or didn&#039;t answer). That seems to be a much more realistic picture than what was stated above (which would have implied that no one reads more than 5 books in a year!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;only 32 percent of adults over the age of 18 said they’d read somewhere between one and five books in the previous 12 months. In other words, 68 percent of the respondents—which is roughly two-thirds—hadn’t even read one single book in the past year.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not so, unless you are looking at different data than I am. The chart on page 19 of the PDF (titled Book Reading Trends Over Time) did indeed state that 32% of adults over the age of 18 read 1-5 books in the last twelve months, however, it also states that only 19% read none (not 68% as you stated). 15% read 6-10 books; 26%, 11-50; and 5% over 50. (The remaining 3% either didn&#8217;t know or didn&#8217;t answer). That seems to be a much more realistic picture than what was stated above (which would have implied that no one reads more than 5 books in a year!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 383/413 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2013-06-19 09:01:29 -->