Assuming you’re interested in the confluence of HTML5  and the monetization of digital publishing, you’ll definitely want to check out this recent Mashable article , which covers a panel that took place at the Mashable Media Summit  last Friday, November 30.
Thinking Outside the App, as the panel was titled, appears to have essentially dealt with just one question, which Mashable reporter Laura Indvik puts forward in her post: “Given the amount of traffic publishers are seeing from mobile web-browsers, coupled with improvements in HTML5 … does it make sense for publishers to continue to invest in native apps for tablets and smartphones?”
Panelist Rob Grimshaw, the managing director of the Financial Times‘ FT.com website, explained that the paper chose “to pull its native apps  for iPhone and iPad devices last year because it ‘wasn’t right’ for the organization,” as Indvik writes.
Here’s the real jaw-dropper, direct from the article:
Since the app was pulled, the number of iOS subscribers to the FT has increased by 70%, Grimshaw said. In fact, nearly a fifth of new subscriptions are coming from mobile devices, he added.
If you’re wondering what it is, exactly, that makes that single factoid such a game changer, consider that the Financial Times was required to pay “30 percent of [its] subscription revenue to Apple” for the benefit and privilege of having an iOS-hosted app. For a publication the size of FT, that’s no pocket change.
Click here  to read the full Mashable story.
* * *