gender debateSaw a great write-up this morning from a blog called The Bookseller on the ‘gender debate’ in children’s book publishing. As the article explains:

“A petition launched by campaign group Let Toys Be Toys, aims to encourage publishers to drop what it calls “limiting labels” on books, with publishers Usborne, Igloo and Buster Books, owned by Michael O’Mara Books, among those it is targeting. The petition has so far been signed by close to 2,000 people.”

What I found most interesting about the whole thing was the comment from Mr. Mara about why his company was not prepared to abandon gendered books completely: because, right or wrong, it’s how people shop: they put things like ‘books for boys’ or ‘books for girls’ into the Amazon search engines and while his company does have many books which are not specially geared to boys or girls, they do have a few products which fill this niche.

I think that unfortunately, he’s a little bit right. I try to shop by interest when I buy for kids. If I am looking for a book for my nephew, who loves cars, I look for books about those. It doesn’t have to say ‘the boys book of cars’ on it. But with that said, his baby sister finally got big enough to be interested in his toys, and now we all find ourselves buying more girlie things for her so she’ll have her own things and leave big brother alone. The Beloved has been bewildered by this. He doesn’t understand what there is to do with a stuffed pony, for instance, besides ‘carry it around and then you have a pony’, and he finds the girlie Lego themes much less compelling than those for boys. News van, vs. spaceship? Pink and purple high school vs. castle? No contest, for him. And, much as he loves his girlie little niece, I think he’d be delighted if she turned out to be the sort of girl that preferred the spaceship and the castle.

I think Mr. Mara has it right: a diverse product line, with options for those who prefer and other options for those who don’t, is probably the best way to do business.

Previous articleN2A card on Nook HD: Two weeks later
Next articleMorning Roundup: Sesame Street on Kobo. Less is more in the future of reading?
"I’m a journalist, a teacher and an e-book fiend. I work as a French teacher at a K-3 private school. I use drama, music, puppets, props and all manner of tech in my job, and I love it. I enjoy moving between all the classes and having a relationship with each child in the school. Kids are hilarious, and I enjoy watching them grow and learn. My current device of choice for reading is my Amazon Kindle Touch, but I have owned or used devices by Sony, Kobo, Aluratek and others. I also read on my tablet devices using the Kindle app, and I enjoy synching between them, so that I’m always up to date no matter where I am or what I have with me."


  1. True diversity lies in allowing everyone the choice to be how they like, as long as they don’t harm others. While some might stretch principle to insist any labels “harm,” I put that in sneer quotes quite deliberately. Gender preference is statistically real and has a biological basis apart from socialization. It can be de-emphasized (and arguably should be) but to try to actively stamp it out is just as anti-diversity and anti-tolerance as promoting it.

The TeleRead community values your civil and thoughtful comments. We use a cache, so expect a delay. Problems? E-mail