<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morning Roundup — Stories you may have missed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/news-roundup-2/morning-roundup-stories-you-may-have-missed-45/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/news-roundup-2/morning-roundup-stories-you-may-have-missed-45/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lowney</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/news-roundup-2/morning-roundup-stories-you-may-have-missed-45/comment-page-1/#comment-1224155</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Lowney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 02:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=75672#comment-1224155</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Right to Resell&quot; piece alerts us to a rising backlash to the double-speak of eBook retailers who say &quot;buy&quot; this book when the reality is that we are actually renting it for who knows how long.  Our first sale rights are not abrogated by the fact that the item for sale is in digital form.  We waive those rights via the contracts we &quot;sign.&quot;  An important part of the moral validity of a contract is whether all parties genuinely understand the terms.  In the case of eBooks, this is not at all clear.  Purveyors of eBooks say &quot;buy&quot; when the contract says &quot;rent.&quot;  Since only a Philadelphia lawyer can see this duplicity, it&#039;s no wonder that the purchasing decisions of consumers are poorly informed.  Eventually, though, enough people discover the ruse and begin agitating for legislation to level the playing field so that the average consumer understands the terms of sale. Hence, the call for &quot;You bought it, you own it&quot; laws.  This could have been avoided with a more honest approach to the sale of eBooks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Right to Resell&#8221; piece alerts us to a rising backlash to the double-speak of eBook retailers who say &#8220;buy&#8221; this book when the reality is that we are actually renting it for who knows how long.  Our first sale rights are not abrogated by the fact that the item for sale is in digital form.  We waive those rights via the contracts we &#8220;sign.&#8221;  An important part of the moral validity of a contract is whether all parties genuinely understand the terms.  In the case of eBooks, this is not at all clear.  Purveyors of eBooks say &#8220;buy&#8221; when the contract says &#8220;rent.&#8221;  Since only a Philadelphia lawyer can see this duplicity, it&#8217;s no wonder that the purchasing decisions of consumers are poorly informed.  Eventually, though, enough people discover the ruse and begin agitating for legislation to level the playing field so that the average consumer understands the terms of sale. Hence, the call for &#8220;You bought it, you own it&#8221; laws.  This could have been avoided with a more honest approach to the sale of eBooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 319/349 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2013-05-22 14:50:59 -->