6

dualscreendesktop.jpgI was (re)introduced to the concept of dual screens on the desktop recently. At first I thought having two monitors might be a bit over the top, but when I returned home to my own pc at the end of the day, I missed the second screen.

Apparently, I am late to the dual screen game. In an October 2005 article, usability firm 37 Signals report that giving a subject a bigger screen led to a 10 – 44 % increase in productivity; Microsoft claim in an undated article that using two screens instead of one leads to a 9 – 50 % increase in productivity.

Microsoft and 37 Signals (a Microsoft supplier) may not be one hundred percent objective here. So I don’t know if claims about increased productivity are true for everyone. But a thing that I did discover, and that makes it relevant to the digital library, is that with two or more screens, reading documents off the screen, in their glorious digital format, became a useful substitute for printing documents and putting them next to me on the desk. I started to employ space vertically instead of horizontally.

Here’s my professional problem: as a web developer I have to somehow meld a functional design, an interactive design and a graphical design into a working website; and since I don’t know everything, I need several manuals and specifications around to aid me. Having one screen for reading, and one for working already helps a lot.

Of course, and as an aside: having two screens on the desktop (or one 24 inch whopper) still doesn’t mean that two half E Ink screens are more useful than one full one. Still, the Teleblog commenters came up with some interesting explanations of why a dual E Ink screen could be good, even when I had posed the question with tongue firmly planted in cheek.

 
6