<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morning Links — News Updates from Kobo, Amazon and Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/morning-roundup/morning-links-news-updates-from-kobo-amazon-and-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/morning-roundup/morning-links-news-updates-from-kobo-amazon-and-apple/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lowney</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/morning-roundup/morning-links-news-updates-from-kobo-amazon-and-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1231956</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Lowney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=77340#comment-1231956</guid>
		<description>Re the piece on University Libraries &quot;sharing&quot; eBooks, the belief among academic librarians that commercial publishers will always be the primary and best source for eBooks appears to me to be seriously undermining their bargaining position.  This weakening also threatens to bring up the question of whether traditional academic libraries are the best option for handling digital works.  To put it bluntly, I think that they are shooting themselves in the foot and then bragging about how good their aim is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the piece on University Libraries &#8220;sharing&#8221; eBooks, the belief among academic librarians that commercial publishers will always be the primary and best source for eBooks appears to me to be seriously undermining their bargaining position.  This weakening also threatens to bring up the question of whether traditional academic libraries are the best option for handling digital works.  To put it bluntly, I think that they are shooting themselves in the foot and then bragging about how good their aim is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 319/348 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2013-05-26 03:52:24 -->