<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paid vs. Free Entertainment: A Case Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/library/pay-vs-free-entertainment-a-case-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/library/pay-vs-free-entertainment-a-case-study/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:09:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Jermey</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/library/pay-vs-free-entertainment-a-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1242708</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Jermey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=79359#comment-1242708</guid>
		<description>Somebody pointed out a long time ago that the telecommunications companies could actually make more money by taking over the music and entertainment business and making everything available over the Internet for free; the revenue from increased bandwidth charges would more than make up for the cost. I don&#039;t know if the economics would still add up -- or even if they really did add up then -- but it&#039;s an intriguing idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody pointed out a long time ago that the telecommunications companies could actually make more money by taking over the music and entertainment business and making everything available over the Internet for free; the revenue from increased bandwidth charges would more than make up for the cost. I don&#8217;t know if the economics would still add up &#8212; or even if they really did add up then &#8212; but it&#8217;s an intriguing idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Preece</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/library/pay-vs-free-entertainment-a-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1242592</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Preece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=79359#comment-1242592</guid>
		<description>&quot;Free&quot; is sort of a technical term here. Your news is free... except if you need to subscribe to cable to get it. Your cable company pays Fox (or CNN or whatever) for your right to use it. Same with music... sometimes it&#039;s free and sometimes it&#039;s paid. Just because you don&#039;t have a meter running doesn&#039;t mean that you&#039;re not paying for it... as part of a bundle you&#039;re buying. Sure there&#039;s a lot of advertiser supported stuff out there but am I the only one who&#039;s stopped watching much broadcast TV because the ads have gotten overwhelming?

As far as books go, I&#039;d just as soon not worry about product placement, obtrusive pre-rolls or sponsored page flips. Even if books were a good medium for advertising, I think advertising dollars would decrease availability of books because advertising dollars would concentrate on best-sellers. I guess I&#039;ve never understood how we were supposed to get everything free paid for by advertising (what, exactly would they advertise if everything was free?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Free&#8221; is sort of a technical term here. Your news is free&#8230; except if you need to subscribe to cable to get it. Your cable company pays Fox (or CNN or whatever) for your right to use it. Same with music&#8230; sometimes it&#8217;s free and sometimes it&#8217;s paid. Just because you don&#8217;t have a meter running doesn&#8217;t mean that you&#8217;re not paying for it&#8230; as part of a bundle you&#8217;re buying. Sure there&#8217;s a lot of advertiser supported stuff out there but am I the only one who&#8217;s stopped watching much broadcast TV because the ads have gotten overwhelming?</p>
<p>As far as books go, I&#8217;d just as soon not worry about product placement, obtrusive pre-rolls or sponsored page flips. Even if books were a good medium for advertising, I think advertising dollars would decrease availability of books because advertising dollars would concentrate on best-sellers. I guess I&#8217;ve never understood how we were supposed to get everything free paid for by advertising (what, exactly would they advertise if everything was free?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 335/366 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2013-05-23 13:16:00 -->