<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unlocking Cellular Devices Became Illegal Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/legal/unlocking-cellular-devices-becomes-illegal-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/legal/unlocking-cellular-devices-becomes-illegal-today/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juli Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/legal/unlocking-cellular-devices-becomes-illegal-today/comment-page-1/#comment-1233269</link>
		<dc:creator>Juli Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=77560#comment-1233269</guid>
		<description>@Alexander, Except that from what I understand, the rule also applies to phones that are out of contract, which definitely doesn&#039;t makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alexander, Except that from what I understand, the rule also applies to phones that are out of contract, which definitely doesn&#8217;t makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Inglis</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/legal/unlocking-cellular-devices-becomes-illegal-today/comment-page-1/#comment-1233254</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Inglis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=77560#comment-1233254</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a silly rule since it is so easy to purchase an unlock code for an Android device and many other operating systems.

But there is nothing wrong with a carrier selling a locked device and not assisting the customer in unlocking it until the device is paid for. If you&#039;ve signed a two year contract to buy a device with a plan that includes $20/mth in a subsidy (you bought a $500 phone for $99), then you have no right to &quot;walk away&quot; before paying for the phone in full by staying for the term of your contract. (No on forced you to buy the buy at a discount in the first place.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a silly rule since it is so easy to purchase an unlock code for an Android device and many other operating systems.</p>
<p>But there is nothing wrong with a carrier selling a locked device and not assisting the customer in unlocking it until the device is paid for. If you&#8217;ve signed a two year contract to buy a device with a plan that includes $20/mth in a subsidy (you bought a $500 phone for $99), then you have no right to &#8220;walk away&#8221; before paying for the phone in full by staying for the term of your contract. (No on forced you to buy the buy at a discount in the first place.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Jermey</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/legal/unlocking-cellular-devices-becomes-illegal-today/comment-page-1/#comment-1233166</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Jermey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=77560#comment-1233166</guid>
		<description>In Australia part of the deal by which mobile phone companies gained access to part of the broadcasting spectrum was that they would permit free phone unlocking after a fixed period of use -- normally 24 months -- and users can keep their numbers if they move to a different provider. It sounds like US consumers are being shafted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Australia part of the deal by which mobile phone companies gained access to part of the broadcasting spectrum was that they would permit free phone unlocking after a fixed period of use &#8212; normally 24 months &#8212; and users can keep their numbers if they move to a different provider. It sounds like US consumers are being shafted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lowney</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/legal/unlocking-cellular-devices-becomes-illegal-today/comment-page-1/#comment-1233132</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Lowney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 02:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=77560#comment-1233132</guid>
		<description>One must also bear in mind that carrier locking isn&#039;t ubiquitous.  For example, the iPhone 5 from Verizon has a SIM card slot which is unlocked to any GSM carrier. Of course, this could be construed as permission from Verizon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One must also bear in mind that carrier locking isn&#8217;t ubiquitous.  For example, the iPhone 5 from Verizon has a SIM card slot which is unlocked to any GSM carrier. Of course, this could be construed as permission from Verizon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -Andy-</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/legal/unlocking-cellular-devices-becomes-illegal-today/comment-page-1/#comment-1233118</link>
		<dc:creator>-Andy-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 01:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=77560#comment-1233118</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the Librarian of Congress who determines exceptions to the DMCA. 

This isn&#039;t iPhone specific. And it has nothing to do with &#039;jailbreaking&#039; iPhones - which is still legal, it has to do with carrier locking, which affects all cell phones and is different (Sure, you can&#039;t unlock without jailbreaking, on an iPhone. But jailbreaking iPhones, unlike ipads, is still legal).

Also, no one puts a custom ROM on an iPhone - that would be an Android activity. What you should have said is that you have to jailbreak an iPhone in order to sideload iPhone apps from non-Apple app repositories, (which are not ROMs)

You should also go read the Ars Technica post about this for actual details. They appear to have done a bit more research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the Librarian of Congress who determines exceptions to the DMCA. </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t iPhone specific. And it has nothing to do with &#8216;jailbreaking&#8217; iPhones &#8211; which is still legal, it has to do with carrier locking, which affects all cell phones and is different (Sure, you can&#8217;t unlock without jailbreaking, on an iPhone. But jailbreaking iPhones, unlike ipads, is still legal).</p>
<p>Also, no one puts a custom ROM on an iPhone &#8211; that would be an Android activity. What you should have said is that you have to jailbreak an iPhone in order to sideload iPhone apps from non-Apple app repositories, (which are not ROMs)</p>
<p>You should also go read the Ars Technica post about this for actual details. They appear to have done a bit more research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 383/412 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2013-05-24 04:58:16 -->