Is anyone still paying attention to the DOJ/ebook antitrust case?

DOJ vs. AppleI guess I’d forgotten. Now that all the the publishing players have settled, abandoning agency pricing and returning to the wholesale slums, the DOJ/e-book antitrust case, which popped up again in everyone’s news feeds this week, feels a little anticlimactic.

The DOJ, perhaps simply because it’s what it found, or perhaps because there’s no one left to pick on, is framing the last defendant standing, Apple, as the “ringmaster” in the price-fixing suit, according the New York Times.

With the case set to go to trial June 3 in New York (and what a fine note on which to end BEA), I find myself wondering: At this point, to what end? If Apple was, indeed, in the wrong and rounded up a posse of five Big-6 publishers to crank up pricing and stick it to Amazon, then justice must be done. But with the publisher defendants all settling, the rest seems sort of academic. If Apple loses, it could be on the line for big fines and damages, but beyond that, e-book prices have already dropped substantially in the wake of the publisher settlements. If it wins, however, what of the settlements the publishers reached? Apple claims that its bargained-for contracts with the publishers couldn’t be reinstated after “prevailing in court.” Which sounds like the best Apple can hope for is winning, which would be a hollow, expensive victory.

Other than determining Apple’s role in this, is there anything you’re hoping to get out of the looming dog-and-pony show?

* This article originally appeared on the website of Book Business magazine, a TeleRead sister publication.

5 Comments on Is anyone still paying attention to the DOJ/ebook antitrust case?

  1. I haven’t noticed prices going down from the big six.

  2. Ummm…. where’s my promised refund on ALL the books I bought at higher prices? That’s what I’m waiting for!

  3. What’s in it for Apple? Not having to pay an even more expensive fine and face sanctions, perhaps? Depending on what sanctions the DoJ deems appropriate if Apple loses, paying the lawyers might actually be the better strategic option. After all, if it’s just a matter of money, Apple has more money than God. But being legally required to operate its stores in certain ways could be damaging in the longer term.

  4. I remember being a massive advocate and participant in the $9.99 boycott. There were many who advocated that we let the market forces play out naturally, but thankfully we did not. It all has the feel of lemmings being led to the edge of the precipice. Apple may very well have colluded to drive price points higher, which left readers with little other option, than to retaliate.

  5. I do think there is a potentially interesting reason for Apple to continue along this path of a trial.

    They are trying to get Amazon to release a lot of detailed information about their processes and accounting that has never been released before.

    http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/content-and-e-books/article/57308-amazon-fights-to-keep-secrets-in-e-book-trial.html

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.

*



wordpress analytics