6

The news I’m reading about the Kindle 2 seems to dwell on the contrast
issue; whether or not the type is easy to read. The gray background
and the non-black type has been the cause of many discussions.

One of the many fixes proposed is to change the font to a different
bold-faced font, blackening the type to make it easier to read. At the
time of this writing, changing the font requires a non-Amazon hack
that can be reversed.

I’ve thought about doing this, but there is a cost I’m not ready to
pay. If you change the font to all bold, what happens to intentional
bold type in books and documents, especially in-line words? If
everything is bold, then what happens to that which has been made bold
in the original document? I haven’t tested this, as I’m not ready yet
to change the default type-face.

Widows and Orphans

A more glaring problem is the Kindle’s inability to properly display
Widows and Orphans. A Widow, in typesetting, is when the last line of a paragraph appears at the top of the following page. widow.gif

An Orphan is the first line of a paragraph at the bottom of a page and the remaining text appears on the next page.orphan.gif

I’ll grant that for most people, this probably is not a concern. However, for me (and I hope others), this lack of proper typesetting takes me out of the story for a second.

As you can change the leading on the Kindle 2 (leading is also called line height or line spacing), the lines of text can vary, depending on what you set; Shift+ALT and a number (default is 3). As the text flow is re-created when setting the leading, more or less lines on a page appear, depending on the setting. No matter what setting you use, at some point in the book widows and orphans appear.

Modern word processors have settings for Widows and Orphans, either to toggle on or off, as in Microsoft Word. When on, at least two lines of text from a paragraph appear on a page. Other text creation engines have more liberal settings, where you can set the minimum number of paragraph lines on each page. Therefore, in word processors, the
program paginates to accommodate the settings. This, however, is with text creators, not readers. Readers, like the Kindle, must parse the full text flow displaying the optimum number of lines, fitting the virtual page. Unfortunately, the youth of the technology in the Kindle does not yet know how to determine Widows and Orphans.

Okay, I know this can’t be a major Kindle problem for most people; they probably are unaware this issue exists. So, while it’s not the type of issue forcing Kindle returns and it’s not on the scale of the plethora of contrast complaints, it does rank as an issue which can be fixed via version upgrade.

 
6