Amazon needs to deal with DRM when the time is right, but fixing its publishing platform is a more immediate need
March 31, 2009 | 4:20 pm
By Stephen Windwalker
I don’t bring any special credibility to the table here at TeleRead. I’m a working author, a believer in the potential of and vision behind the Kindle both for readers and authors, and I have acquired a bit of expertise about Amazon’s underlying business strategies over a decade of writing about the company’s innovations and practices.
I care about Digital Rights Management (DRM) issues, but I am not doctrinaire about them. My inclination is to believe that these issues will be sorted out at certain critical times in the future development of the book business, and that it may be counterproductive to try to resolve them too early in the process. With a few notable exceptions, the publishing companies that ought to have figured out the most about the importance of electronic publishing to their futures seem to know the least. The process by which they learn – as for all of us in any way connected with the book trades – is likely to be somewhat Darwinian.
Just as a time came when Apple was able to locate its corporate self-interest in allowing customers to remove DRM from their iTunes store audio purchases for a price, a similar time will probably come for Amazon with respect to customers’ Kindle Store purchases. In both cases, the timing seems to require that some critical mass of the applicable publishers reach a certain nuanced understanding of and experience with the changing revenue streams and marketing channels that digital publishing and distribution allow. It’s not exactly dialectical materialism, but it is a world in which changes in politics must be driven by, rather than be the drivers of, changes in economic relationships.
We can’t all be Lawrence Lessig or Cory Doctorow, and neither Amazon nor Apple will ever be Google, Creative Commons, or Project Gutenberg. Most publishers possess little understanding of Lessig or Doctorow or anyone else who has discovered the viral (and, often, easily monetized) marketing power of setting one’s words free in selected venues, and many probably label them as the “free books crowd” and shut down reflexively in the face of any opportunity to listen to them or learn from them. Call me Pollyanna, but I believe that Jeff Bezos does possess some nuanced understanding of these issues, and in time, armed with the larger and larger payments his company’s Kindle division is making to publishers, will be in a better position to bring them along into a future where there is a wide acceptance of DRM-free electronic publishing standards. But on the Darwinian path to that future, it would be very uncharacteristic of Amazon not to continue to consolidate and strengthen its position.
Meanwhile, I have to admit that – among the various electronic publishing issues on my radar – I am more troubled by the highly unstable, weakly supported, “beta Wild West” nature of Amazon’s Kindle publishing platform. I’ve been publishing books, articles, and book excerpts there with great success since the week the Kindle was launched in November 2007. Initially I was impressed with the potential that the Kindle Digital Text Platform (DTP) held out for authors and publishers to experiment with new ways to connect with readers. Jeff Bezos appeared on the Charlie Rose program and elsewhere heralding a Kindle future in which authors might serialize their books for Kindle readers a la Dickens or Dostoyevsky in an earlier age. The Kindle Store allowed publishers such as myself the neat opportunity to support readers by allowing them to update and refresh a previous Kindle Store purchase any time, to retrieve new content, simply by downloading the file anew from their digital media library at no additional cost.
That very popular feature was subsequently disabled and abandoned by Amazon with no notice to customers or publishers, and the Kindle’s Digital Text Platform remains deeply flawed and almost totally unsupported. Uploaded files seem to get mangled as often as not, particularly if they are sent from a Mac or attempt to make any use of the Kindle’s native web browser. And I have discerned zero initiative by Amazon to engage Kindle owners in unleashing what could be the awesome viral power of social and literary networking around this most connected of e-readers.
Why not just give up, or follow Cory Doctorow’s principled suggestion and simply boycott the Kindle Store? Well, between Kindle owners and the potential iPhone and iPod Touch market for the Kindle App, we are talking about tens of millions of potential readers, and no polemic will ever convince me that any author should start turning his back on obviously motivated readers. And, especially in these difficult times, it is not inconsequential that the royalties paid to Kindle authors – for those who pay attention – are, for now, about as good as any in the book business.
By Stephen Windwalker, publisher of Kindle Nation



Previous

SUBSCRIBE TO RSS
Comments:
“I don’t bring any special credibility to the table here at TeleRead.”
All modesty aside, now.
Your piece advises readers and writers to take it on faith that Amazon will, sometime, somehow, make it all right regarding DRM.
Isn’t a fond eye on the company store to be expected from the author of The Complete User’s Guide To the Amazing Amazon Kindle 2?
Personally, I’m glad to have all points of view represented here at TeleRead, and I know David is too. Having periodic contributions from a pro-Kindle writer nicely balances out the anti-Amazon bias of certain other writers here, self included.
The “fairness doctrine” may have gone by the wayside, and rightly so, but it’s still nice to have a variety of opinions. If nothing else, it gives the rest of us something to complain about.
Anyway, given the first two of the last three paragraphs, I don’t think we can completely accuse Stephen of viewing the Kindle through rose-colored glasses.
Actually, I think it is very important that someone view Amazon through rose-colored glasses. I would like such a perspective to come true — I’m so tired of always being in the cynical camp when it comes to Bezos and Amazon, that the rose-colored perspective gives me hope. Sadly, I doubt that this story will end like Cinderella’s story, but I’m glad that someone has a cheerier view than I as regards Bezos and Amazon.
Yep, we’re encouraging Steve to speak his mind even when Paul and Chris and I and most TeleBlog readers would disagree. I myself would love to see Amazon surprise us and listen to customers on DRM matters. Meanwhile in responding to a routine Sony feedback form, I politely complained about DRM. I hope Kindle owners will do likewise. Thanks. David
Wow, what a tease! Could you follow up in a later post and give more details on how and in what way DTP files get ‘mangled’ and if there are any workarounds?
Much to ponder. I appreciate the encouragement to speak my mind, although I’ve never needed encouragement. I’m sure that in my books as well as in my Kindle Nation newsletter I have been as critical of Amazon as anyone else here.
I certainly didn’t mean to advise “readers and writers to take it on faith that Amazon will, sometime, somehow, make it all right regarding DRM.” People should advocate and organize aggressively for the issues they care about, as I have been doing for the past 35 years, most recently on text-to-speech.
The only advice I would give is something that I learned in many years as a community organizer: when you want someone in a position of power to do something, it is essential to envision a strategy that is built around that player’s self-interest (unless you have a chance to actually take power). That was my underlying point about Apple’s movement on DRM issues. My observation that Bezos may have a nuanced understanding of DRM and related open-content and big-tent issues, based on years of watching Amazon’s practices, is not intended to imply that Amazon will do the right thing because it is the right thing. I think it more likely that Amazon, once it achieves a certain level of hegemony on this e-book terrain, will begin moving away from DRM because it will ultimately be more profitable to do so.
But maybe they won’t. Meanwhile, I submit that it is important for those who are committed to the anti-DRM fight to realize that the fight does not become a campaign until it has three elements: (1) a clear-eyed sense of the relative support that exists on each side of the question, where it comes from, and the extent to which consumers care or don’t care; (2) total intellectual honesty about the current state of play — for instance, it seems to me that assertions that ePub is the e-book publishing “standard” or that “serious e-book-lovers hate DRM” declare victories that have yet to be won; and (3) the self-interest strategy noted above.
All that being said, I’m sure that I am too easy on Amazon on some things and too hard on them on others. But I always try to avoid those rose-colored specs, just as I always try to take a good hard look at my own objectivity when I feel moved to charge someone else with bias.
On the DTP issue, sorry, didn’t mean to be a tease. The fact is that I have been working through considerable frustration in a very time-intensive process of dealing with changes in the DTP. I have made use of some work-around approaches, and I may be getting to the point where I have something more useful to say about it all in the next week or so, but (see above) I don’t want to declare victory too early.
Well, Stephen, we’ll all hope for the best with Amazon. Meanwhile I’m intrigued to hear about your community organizing background. It’s a positive that you, Obama and one of the characters in The Solomon Scandals have in common.
My thoughts about serious e-book lovers (at least serious about the tech) are based on hundreds of comments that readers have submitted to TeleRead over the years. DRM easily remains the The Topic here, or one of them. As a group people here do indeed want to own books for real or as close to it as they can come.
As for ePub, didn’t the major publishers agree to it via IDPF, and aren’t they actually starting to implement it at least as a distribution mechanism and in some cases more? ePub will even be the core of the forthcoming version of eReader software.
The Amazon DTP issue? I can’t wait for your writings on that topic. Tips especially cherished—including on the issue of making sure that, depending on publishes’ preference, books will or won’t be DRMed.
Thanks,
David