Urgently needed for IDPF e-book standards: Shared annotations
June 28, 2009 | 11:26 pm
By David Rothman
What a laugh—e-book standards without provisions for shared annotations! I remain disappointed that the IDPF hasn’t acted on this, at least not to my knowledge.
Just what’s up, guys? Publishers should fret less over locking up textbooks and more about ways to increase their utility, so they stand less chance of losing out to Wikis and the open Web. And don’t just think of annotations within individual books, but among all books. Some annotations may apply to more than one title, for example.
Meanwhile Peter Brantley at the Internet Archive has pointed to a presentation on an open annotations initiative. Hello, IDPF? Care to do shared annotations on your own or, even better, link up with a reputable effort in this direction?
Relevant Web site: OpenAnnotations.org. Puzzle of the moment: why the annotations formats page tells me: “You are not allowed to view this page.” A technical problem or exclusionary elitists at work? Both the IDPF and the groups it hooks up need to keep everything visible to the public.
Image: JCDL Tuesday plentary: Openness, CC-licensed from Grey Cats.



Previous

SUBSCRIBE TO RSS
Comments:
Hi,
Interesting link over to discuss open annotation group. I found the link over to OpenAnnotations useful – but I think the link is spelled incorrectly.. I think the link should be to http://www.openannotation.org.
This has has an interesting history going all the way back to Tim Berners-Lee and the initial ideas for what WWW would be. The Mosaic browser and NCSA web server had support for shared group annotations protocol back in 1993. Later there was a w3c working group developing a standard and also a annotation server and browser plugins called Annotea
Sean Farrell
Edinburgh, Scotland