2

joewikert As I read this press release earlier today I got to thinking. This company, Smart’s Publishing, is just leveraging the technology and tracking recipient reading habits to better serve their customers. Pretty straightforward stuff and highly useful information for the newsletter publishers using the service.

We don’t think too much about the footprints we create when opening and reading e-newsletters, but what if similar tracking features found their way onto your Kindle or other e-book reader? Would you care?

Privacy valued by consumers

My sense is that most consumers feel their book-reading habits should be considered private. Of course, if you’re buying your books through an online vendor or using a member discount card at a brick-and-mortar store, well, your habits are already being tracked.

I’m talking about something much more granular than this though. For example, would publishers like to know what percentage of customers typically only get about 20 pages into an e-book before giving up and never reading the rest?

Would reference book publishers like to know what topics tend to be the most viewed or what terms are most frequently searched for? Could these patterns have value? Absolutely.

Someday: Pay extra for privacy?

Perhaps that’s another pricing model that will find its way into the e-book world:

You could pay one price for privacy where your activity isn’t being tracked or a lower price if you’re willing to let the vendor capture your habits and potentially sell the resulting data.

Moderator: Joe raises important issues, and I hope others will weigh in. One thing to keep in mind is that with the ad-supported model, user data would be more helpful to publishers and marketers than even with the paid model. But what about the negatives? Quite objectively, the threat isn’t just from corporate invasions of privacy—for example, insurance companies finding out you’re reading books on cancer. Washington is far, far more interested than before in snooping into citizens’ private lives and, yes, has gotten the private sector involved, sometimes in rather problematic ways, as in the case of illegal wiretapping and other snooping. Should the cash-strapped be penalized because they can’t afford books without spy-friendly “features”? On a separate matter, I just noticed that Windows Live Writer tripped me up again, so that my byline, rather than Joe’s, briefly appeared over this post. Sorry, Joe. – D.R.

Technorati Tags:
 
2