3

imageimageI figured that it would be a timesink to get Amazon to stop DRMing The Solomon Scandals. Sure enough, it has been, and the damned DRM edition is still up at Amazon despite my objections and my publisher’s. Amazon’s Kafkaesque e-forms don’t simplify the task.

So much for Jeff Bezo’s claim to Jon Stewart that Amazon is agnostic on DRM. Once again he comes across as two-faced on this issue. “Publishers get to decide whether they want to encrypt the books and put DRM on or not,” he told Stewart.

If you feel you must buy from Amazon rather than elsewhere, get the nonDRMed e-book or the paper edition. Please, boycott Amazon’s DRMed Scandals. Hey, Jeff, I love the way you respect my intellectual property.

A little more background: My publisher couldn’t get Scandals into the Mobipocket store unless we agreed to DRM. Then Amazon used the DRMed edition in the Kindle store. It remained there even after we removed the Mobi edition. Still there. Hello, FTC? Time to stop scaring mom-and-pop book reviewers (wittingly or not) and get the guts to  investigate Amazon for real? No, I’ll not link here to the proprietary-DRMed book but will gladly point federal investigators to it.

Amazon has also bungled the writeup on my book—with, for example, horrible formatting and blurbs from Jim Fallows and Bettina Gregory reproduced three friggin’ times, each—but that’s another story. I know it ain’t so, but it’s almost as if Amazon is trying to sabotage me.

Look, I see many good things about about Amazon and love my Kindle’s text to speech. May Bezos not just be agnostic on DRM, but also work to get publishers to drop it—perhaps substituting social DRM as a compromise! He was clueful enough to do a DRMless MP3 store. Time to work with consenting publishers to do the same for e-books, so they can be read on a variety of devices? Yes, I also hope Jeff will also let the Kindle natively render ePub-standard books.

 
3