PDF and XPS export add-on for Office—free
September 8, 2006 | 8:06 pm
By David Rothman
Adobe howled when Microsoft wanted to let Office 2007 users export PDF. Supposedly PDF was an open format. But not when an arch rival wanted to use the standard. Rather than risking a lawsuit, however, Microsoft has now made PDF exportation available through a free add-on that also does XPS. (Via Alexander at MobileRead.)
Detail: Yes, I know Adobe would say the issue is anti-trust or whatever. If that’s the case, however, I’d say it’s still a great example of Adobe trying to crimp the competition at the expense of users. I’m not talking about the equivalent of Microsoft using the free Explorer browser to kill off rival Netscape. Export isn’t that novel a function these days.
And speaking of Adobe—or maybe to it: Will you guys please stop throwing in Photoshop Album with downloads of Adobe Reader? I’m may have missed out on an opt-out checkbox during the installation process—the fault is very likely mine in part. Regardless, I’m not too happy after having uninstalled this A-bloat-be crap and found that Microsoft’s Photo Album then took over my JPGs, which normally are entrusted to L View Pro.
Hmm. A metaphor for the e-book wars? Adobe triumphs, only to see Microsoft crush it, the way Redmond did WordPerfect.
Luckily I knew how to untangle the file-association mess, but newbies might not be so lucky. Oh, how the greed of corporate marketers complicates life for end users. At least with a genuinely nonproprietary nonprofit e-book format, you’d stand less chance of undergoing such annoyances—you could simply avoid a bloatware reader and choose another for the same format.



Previous

SUBSCRIBE TO RSS
Comments:
I’m afraid having had installed the Album is your fault, since there are pretty clear checkboxes presented for both the album and the Yahoo toolbar when you go to Adobe’s site to download the Reader; uncheck those, and you don’t even have to download them. And practically all commercial applications steal extensions; they shouldn’t because it’s bloody annoying, but Adobe is hardly the only one engaging in this behaviour.
The download’s a bit large since the 3D components are now included in the downloads, which is a plus for corporate users in my opinion; if anyone is planning to exploit the 3D capability now available in Acrobat, having the Reader able to handle them “out of the box” is a virtual necessity. And 3D makes a lot of sense when you do ebooks that are highly technical in nature (product manuals, heavy machinery installation manuals, training manuals, etc… my field of work).
If OSS or MS can’t respond to that challenge, I’m afraid Adobe will continue pretty much unchallenged in the corporate world (and I don’t think MS has all that many chances of managing a breakthrough into the print publishing world, either). On the other hand, this isn’t necessarily bad, because the last thing I would want are several incompatible “standards” I would have to provide the manuals in (now that e-manuals are finally a practical prospect).
Thanks, KP. As noted, I share the blame; but as you yourself note, the downloading was the default. My main point still stands. This is needless complexity. Most novices will probably download the bloat even though few people will need the 3D capability. Then they will see the extension assignments change. I do agree with you that Adobe isn’t the only culprit, but that doesn’t make things less annoying. – David
“Adobe howled…” Is there any evidence of that, aside from Microsoft’s saying so? I don’t remember any, but that could just be my bad memory.
Hi, Bill. See Will Adobe Take Its Microsoft Malcontent to the Courtroom? if you doubt that Adobe lacked passion on this issue. Thanks. David
Nothing substantive there, David. Wasn’t the WSJ story based on “reports” and speculation by Microsoft? In fact, as far as I can tell, not only did Adobe not howl, they didn’t comment on this at all. All the “howling” was from Microsoft, which put out (to anyone who wanted it) a story that didn’t make much sense on its face.
I’m happy you like your commenters to point out the facts
.
Ah, I found a story on this from Adobe’s point of view.