Mobipocket to restore Macmillan feeds for BooksOnBoard and other indie e-stores
November 26, 2007 | 5:06 pm
By David Rothman
“Mobipocket told us this morning that they hope to have Macmillan back for us and others by the end of the week.”
So reports Bob LiVolsi of BooksOnBoard in an e-mail to me.
That’s great news in the wake of concerns that publishers might favor Amazon Kindle and Sony books—at the expense of independent booksellers such as BoB and Fictionwise that use the Mobipocket format. Amazon owns Mobi.
Fictionwise: No anti-trust prob in Amazon’s books below cost
Also see just-posted comments—mentioning the issue of Amazon and competitors from a legal viewpoint—from FW’s Steve Pendergrast. He says he does not see anti-trust law violations in Amazon’s below-cost pricing of best-sellers.
In addition, Steve thinks that the dropped feeds were “more of a clerical error in one case and part of a review of retailers in the other. One of them has already re-authorized us, and our expectation is the other should follow suit soon. I don’t think it has anything to do with Amazon.”
Bob L’s guess at this point: Feeds dropped by mistake
More on the dropped feeds. “It’s not clear what happened here,” says Bob LiVolsi, who, commendably, is not keen on a legal fight.
“I’m guessing it’s not conspiracy, but perhaps someone new at Macmillan did not know how to use the Mobipocket publisher interface, but this is only speculation.
“The Mobipocket team in Paris is composed of very hard-working, committed people,” he says, “and they remain unequivocally supportive of their parent company in their communication to us. The only weakness we’ve seen there is that Amazon does not seem to give them enough resources to keep up with the workload.” Bob adds he’s just speculating; the Mobipocket team has not said that. May Mobi get the extra resources if that’s what the people there need!
Meanwhile Laurent Picard at Bookeen, whose Cybook Gen3 Ink machine, uses Mobi format, has told me he believes that Amazon/Mobipocket will stand behind the format. Great! As much as I want the nonproprietary .epub standard to prevail in the end, we need to look out for readers and indie booksellers in the here and now.
Bottom line: Amazon and Mobi bear close watching, and we should worry about format-hardware-distribution connections. But whatever the reason for restoration (our TeleBlog posts?), BoB and others will get their Mobi feed of Macmillan back. Thanks, Mobi and/or Macmillan!



Previous

SUBSCRIBE TO RSS
Comments:
I’m glad to see you backing off on the antitrust talk, which was knee-jerk and rash. But to be fair you should consider recanting in headlines what your originally accused in headlines …
I wanted to speak up about it when I saw that headline, but just couldn’t find the time to put my thoughts into proper shape. I’m glad Steve P. did the job so well.
Hey, Bryan, questions still exist about the anti-trust thing. I’ll not recant for quoting BooksOnBoard in the headline. This is a legit issue with Amazon dominating online books and slashing prices so drastically; Amazon is far, far more powerful than, say, Fictionwise. BUT even BooksOnBoard isn’t looking to sue. Reasonable people can differ on this issue and hopefully avoid court. I was delighted to offer Steve Pendergrast’s perspective playing down the antitrust angle. BTW, Amazon refused a chance to reply when I asked–I wanted to display its side prominently. Thanks and happy holidays. David
There are still laws against restraint of trade. Forming trusts doesn’t necessarily have to be part of that.