4

Ah, the schadenfreude continues. Andrew Albanese at Publishers Weekly reports that Bob Kohn has filed his appeal of the approval of the Macmillan and Penguin e-book settlements. In the hearing a couple of weeks ago, Judge Cote suggested it was unlikely he would be found to have standing to appeal the case, since he’s not a direct party to the case. However, Kohn is clearly going to keep filing appeals until the appeals courts turn him down.

Kohn’s stance is that the price-fixing conspiracy entered into by the publishers and Apple was not actually illegal, since it served to address “inefficiencies” in the market. He suggests that, despite the higher prices, consumers benefited from the change because it made the e-book market more efficient.

Kohn also argued that, if he is not given standing to appeal, the settlements will not face any appeal scrutiny at all on behalf of consumers. After all, Apple, which is appealing its own case, is not involved in the publisher settlements. And while the publishers surely agree with Kohn’s view that their actions were legal, they are not about to challenge their own settlement deals.

I must admit, I kind of hope Kohn is found to have standing, just because it would be interesting to see how the case goes. But my suspicion is that the appeals court will feel, as Cote does, that he is not involved enough to have a say.

 
4