8

image Isn’t this delightful? Amazon’s Web site told me that TeleRead enjoyed several times more revenue from affiliate fees in May than it actually did.

A corrective notice came after an Amazon employee assured me that the May numbers were correct.

WTF is going on?

Honest mistake, most likely

I’m inclined to believe this was an honest-to-goodness mistake, rather than a hint of some financial mischief.

image Still, if nothing, coming atop other snafus, such as the inability of most people to find  the trade paperback of my novel at Amazon if they don’t type the “The” in The Solomon Scandals, this suggests the need for Amazon to release Kindle unit sales numbers. It is a public company after all. I’m not a securities lawyer, and, again, I am not accusing Amazon here of wrongdoing, but Amazon’s goof is one more reason for the Securities and Exchange Committee to force Jeff Bezos to release precise numbers.

This is also one more example of the need not to build the book industry around one or two all-too-fallible companies.

Ahead is a full reproduction of the notice I received last night:


Dear Amazon Associate:

We are writing to inform you that incorrect balances were displayed in your May earnings report on Associates Central. This was caused by a system error that resulted in an inaccurate display of additional referral fees. The error has been fixed and your earnings summary now shows accurate referral fees.

We apologize for the confusion our mistake may have caused you. If you have any questions on this or any other matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. We greatly appreciate your ongoing participation in the Amazon Associates program.

Thank you,

The Associates Team

 
8