6

image image Remember Prodigy? How invulnerable the online service appeared?

But America Online and the Internet walloped Prodigy, although AOL needed to Net-tize itself to survive.

Industry-wide standards are good. How about the war between Betamax and VHS, where the latter won—to the benefit of consumers and Hollywood alike?

That’s why I’m rooting for Amazon to do ePub, as CEO Jeff Bezos kinda hinted it might. Now, in WSJ.com commentary republished in MarketWatch, Brett Arends is more or less saying the same thing. “What happens if you buy a lot of books on your Kindle and then decide to switch to a different e-book reader from another company using the rival ePub format?” Sony, Bookeen, BeBook, Astak—a slew companies are embracing ePub via Adobe Digital Editions.

“I think Amazon has overestimated their power in the value chain," Arends quotes the Gartner Group’s Allen Weiner, an e-book specialist. "I don’t think their proprietary format is going to have the ability to compete with ePub if that’s offered by everybody else."

Mind you, this isn’t nirvana yet. ePub needs to avoid DRM—which turns it into a proprietary format in effect (the situation with Adobe Digital Editions in regard to DRMed books).

Social DRM, the embedding of customer names and addresses in e-book files, could be a substitute if need be. Then ePub would truly be a standard, as opposed to the danger of yet another conflict between Adobe-DRMed ePub and, say, Amazon-DRMed ePub. Already B&N is on the way to DRM-wrap ePub for eReader.

But at least a DRMed standard format is better than a DRMed proprietary format, since the social DRM for best-sellers—or, better, no DRM—can always come later.  If Jeff Bezos is really smart, he’ll confound the devil out of his rivals at Adobe and open up store selling DRMless ePub, just as he commendably offers DRMless MP3s.

Speaking of ePub: I’d love to see the IDPF tell more how how it will handle the issue of cloud computing and deal with issues such as embedded fonts in that environment. First hand, via OpenReader, which I co-founded, I learned that the usual suspects, yes, the corporate “suits,” needed to be involved in standards development; and I remain supportive of the IDPF for that reason. But I remain grumpy about the IDPF’s pokiness in advancing the ePub standard, and I’m still grumpier about the miserliness of the book industry toward standards development via the group.

 
6