<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The REAL Reason Barnes &amp; Noble is Failing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:19:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-2/#comment-1228690</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1228690</guid>
		<description>Just copied from Kindle Fire HD sales copy: &quot;To purchase, download, or stream movies and TV shows, you must be physically present in the U.S. and have a U.S. billing address.&quot; The pesky territorial limitation troubling Canadians is therefore not unique to B-N.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just copied from Kindle Fire HD sales copy: &#8220;To purchase, download, or stream movies and TV shows, you must be physically present in the U.S. and have a U.S. billing address.&#8221; The pesky territorial limitation troubling Canadians is therefore not unique to B-N.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Preece</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1228560</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Preece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1228560</guid>
		<description>I also don&#039;t understand why B&amp;N hasn&#039;t been more active in marketing eBooks world-wide. Of course there are rights issues, but those issues are really the publishers&#039; problems, not theirs. Amazon certainly has gone after the world market, adding country after country to their Kindle store. I wish B&amp;N would do the same. That said, there is something wrong with B&amp;N even here in the US.

Considering that I did all of my in-store Christmas shopping at B&amp;N (I did my online shopping at eBay and Amazon), I struggle with what, exactly, is wrong. They have a great selection of presents (full disclosure... I&#039;m an early Nook Color owner), their stores are a nice environment for shopping, and you can get a cup of coffee and flip through that book on 1939 Soviet plans for invading Germany that you&#039;d never actually buy. Losing Borders was a blow to US reading. Losing B&amp;N would be a knock-out. 

I&#039;m also sad that they closed Fictionwise. A few years ago, FW was my biggest distributor, generating thousands of dollars. My last check from them was $51.80, so I understand their lack of enthusiasm for continuing the effort. Still, it did give them at least a bit of a world-wide presence... as well as ownership of two of the original eBookstores. I would have thought that they could brand a FW version of the Nook... which seemed to be their original idea in buying FW... remember the first Nooks supported eReader format, not ePub? 

Anyway, they&#039;ve got money from Microsoft. Time to spend some of it expanding worldwide... and doing a better job attracting people to their stores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also don&#8217;t understand why B&amp;N hasn&#8217;t been more active in marketing eBooks world-wide. Of course there are rights issues, but those issues are really the publishers&#8217; problems, not theirs. Amazon certainly has gone after the world market, adding country after country to their Kindle store. I wish B&amp;N would do the same. That said, there is something wrong with B&amp;N even here in the US.</p>
<p>Considering that I did all of my in-store Christmas shopping at B&amp;N (I did my online shopping at eBay and Amazon), I struggle with what, exactly, is wrong. They have a great selection of presents (full disclosure&#8230; I&#8217;m an early Nook Color owner), their stores are a nice environment for shopping, and you can get a cup of coffee and flip through that book on 1939 Soviet plans for invading Germany that you&#8217;d never actually buy. Losing Borders was a blow to US reading. Losing B&amp;N would be a knock-out. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also sad that they closed Fictionwise. A few years ago, FW was my biggest distributor, generating thousands of dollars. My last check from them was $51.80, so I understand their lack of enthusiasm for continuing the effort. Still, it did give them at least a bit of a world-wide presence&#8230; as well as ownership of two of the original eBookstores. I would have thought that they could brand a FW version of the Nook&#8230; which seemed to be their original idea in buying FW&#8230; remember the first Nooks supported eReader format, not ePub? </p>
<p>Anyway, they&#8217;ve got money from Microsoft. Time to spend some of it expanding worldwide&#8230; and doing a better job attracting people to their stores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1228331</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1228331</guid>
		<description>Canada is a special case. The Investment Canada Act blocks bricks-and-mortar bookstores from operating in Canada without permission. In 1995, Canada told both Borders and B&amp;N to stay out.

The Canadian Booksellers Association has repeatedly used the Investment Canada Act to try to get Ottawa to repel the barbarians. Companies like Amazon and Apple, whose mainline businesses aren&#039;t running bookstores — or even the selling of books and other cultural media — have managed to get approval from the Honourable James Moore, Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages. In Amazon&#039;s case, they had to grease the wheels with $20 million.

And they probably had to agree not to call him the Honorable James Moore. :-) A good part of the justification for the Investment Canada Act is to keep American &quot;culture&quot; from corrupting Canadians (as one might infer from the ministry that enforces it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada is a special case. The Investment Canada Act blocks bricks-and-mortar bookstores from operating in Canada without permission. In 1995, Canada told both Borders and B&amp;N to stay out.</p>
<p>The Canadian Booksellers Association has repeatedly used the Investment Canada Act to try to get Ottawa to repel the barbarians. Companies like Amazon and Apple, whose mainline businesses aren&#8217;t running bookstores — or even the selling of books and other cultural media — have managed to get approval from the Honourable James Moore, Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages. In Amazon&#8217;s case, they had to grease the wheels with $20 million.</p>
<p>And they probably had to agree not to call him the Honorable James Moore. <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  A good part of the justification for the Investment Canada Act is to keep American &#8220;culture&#8221; from corrupting Canadians (as one might infer from the ministry that enforces it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr. james willingham</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1228194</link>
		<dc:creator>dr. james willingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1228194</guid>
		<description>Note error &quot;are&quot; should be  &quot;is failing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note error &#8220;are&#8221; should be  &#8220;is failing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr. james willingham</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1228193</link>
		<dc:creator>dr. james willingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1228193</guid>
		<description>There is another reason why Barnes &amp; Noble are failing, and that is there is a decline in readership.  People are becoming more visual, due to the influence of television, movies, and the PC.  In addition there is a decline in the wherewithal of schools to educate students to read.  Whether planned or accidental due to a variety of factors, children in our public schools are not exactly noted for their ability to read and understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is another reason why Barnes &amp; Noble are failing, and that is there is a decline in readership.  People are becoming more visual, due to the influence of television, movies, and the PC.  In addition there is a decline in the wherewithal of schools to educate students to read.  Whether planned or accidental due to a variety of factors, children in our public schools are not exactly noted for their ability to read and understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name (required)</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1228168</link>
		<dc:creator>Name (required)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 14:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1228168</guid>
		<description>What do you mean they do not let me register the device?
The device is Nook Simple Touch, isn&#039;t it?
I purchased one when I was in USA. Target had a Black Friday sale on Nook Simple Touch for $50.

I was *very* annoyed, because the device won&#039;t even switch on for the first time without registering, but after I created a gmail account it let me register with no problem at all. The first thing after registering I rooted it ;-)
Now I can have many reading aplications on the NST, not just the one provided by manufacturer.

I consider it extremely rude from a manufacturer to hold your device *hostage* until they force you to register. This is one of reasons that I will not use their store. The other main reason for not using their store is that they do not let me use it because I do not have USA billing address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean they do not let me register the device?<br />
The device is Nook Simple Touch, isn&#8217;t it?<br />
I purchased one when I was in USA. Target had a Black Friday sale on Nook Simple Touch for $50.</p>
<p>I was *very* annoyed, because the device won&#8217;t even switch on for the first time without registering, but after I created a gmail account it let me register with no problem at all. The first thing after registering I rooted it <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Now I can have many reading aplications on the NST, not just the one provided by manufacturer.</p>
<p>I consider it extremely rude from a manufacturer to hold your device *hostage* until they force you to register. This is one of reasons that I will not use their store. The other main reason for not using their store is that they do not let me use it because I do not have USA billing address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1228072</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 16:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1228072</guid>
		<description>Why am I shopping less and less at B&amp;N, at least in-store?

Because the in-store prices are frequently higher than their on-line store is. I&#039;m not talking about Amazon being cheaper, this is their own web presence. 

Honor the same price in-store that you do online at the register, and I&#039;ll buy more books in-store. I still browse in-store to find new things, because it&#039;s not easy enough to do that online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why am I shopping less and less at B&amp;N, at least in-store?</p>
<p>Because the in-store prices are frequently higher than their on-line store is. I&#8217;m not talking about Amazon being cheaper, this is their own web presence. </p>
<p>Honor the same price in-store that you do online at the register, and I&#8217;ll buy more books in-store. I still browse in-store to find new things, because it&#8217;s not easy enough to do that online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dain Q Gore</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1228063</link>
		<dc:creator>Dain Q Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 14:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1228063</guid>
		<description>interesting, but that nativist parody &quot;map&quot; next to the article kind of doesn&#039;t belong with arguing any sort of nuanced opinion, especially since we&#039;ve elected and re-elected a Progressive into the office of President, and it wasn&#039;t exactly close either time  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting, but that nativist parody &#8220;map&#8221; next to the article kind of doesn&#8217;t belong with arguing any sort of nuanced opinion, especially since we&#8217;ve elected and re-elected a Progressive into the office of President, and it wasn&#8217;t exactly close either time  <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg M.</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1227987</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 00:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1227987</guid>
		<description>Back in the early and mid 90s, before the Internet and Amazon, I worked for Border.  At was a great bookstore: you could finds dozens dozens of uncommon books that sold maybe 1 or 2 copies every other year and people would drive for hours, coming from out of state.  At the time it was the only Borders on the East Coast.  It was the deep selection that brought the buying hoards and created long lines at the cash register.  The B&amp;N had the bestsellers and main backlist, but fewer customers.

The selection was the thing.  It caused Crown Books (a discount chain store) to go out of business.  But as Borders put store everywhere, the selection thinned, and sales went down.  B&amp;N thinned out an already thin selection and stocked more non-books.  

Just before Borders went under, the selection was so poor I HAD to buy from Amazon to find the books I wanted.  B&amp;N was worse.

Why is B&amp;N going to go out of business?  Because I can finishing browsing in less than 15.  Because they only want to sell books that can be stacked in many copies.  Because I&#039;m not going to drive to a B&amp;N, find the book I want isn&#039;t stocked, place a special order, wait two to four weeks, then drive back to pick up the book.

Why should anyone even bother with B&amp;N?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the early and mid 90s, before the Internet and Amazon, I worked for Border.  At was a great bookstore: you could finds dozens dozens of uncommon books that sold maybe 1 or 2 copies every other year and people would drive for hours, coming from out of state.  At the time it was the only Borders on the East Coast.  It was the deep selection that brought the buying hoards and created long lines at the cash register.  The B&amp;N had the bestsellers and main backlist, but fewer customers.</p>
<p>The selection was the thing.  It caused Crown Books (a discount chain store) to go out of business.  But as Borders put store everywhere, the selection thinned, and sales went down.  B&amp;N thinned out an already thin selection and stocked more non-books.  </p>
<p>Just before Borders went under, the selection was so poor I HAD to buy from Amazon to find the books I wanted.  B&amp;N was worse.</p>
<p>Why is B&amp;N going to go out of business?  Because I can finishing browsing in less than 15.  Because they only want to sell books that can be stacked in many copies.  Because I&#8217;m not going to drive to a B&amp;N, find the book I want isn&#8217;t stocked, place a special order, wait two to four weeks, then drive back to pick up the book.</p>
<p>Why should anyone even bother with B&amp;N?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix Torres</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1227986</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix Torres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1227986</guid>
		<description>A couple basic facts: even today, the bulk of publishing revenues come from the high-volume, casual reader driven &quot;bestsellers&quot;. (50 Shades, etc). Those are available everywhere, which is why they amass such a high sales volume.
The value of deep-catalog bookstores is highest for avid readers. They are the ones who are more likely to go to bookstores looking for &quot;something good to read&quot; and morelikely to pickup a midlist/backlist title whereas casual readers are more likely to go when they&#039;re looking for something specific. Usually a word-of-mouth or acclaimed title.
We agree there?
The reason B&amp;N has been reducing the floor space dedicated to books isn&#039;t because they&#039;re devoting less space to the bestsellers but because they are cutting back on the slow-moving midlist/backlist. In the process they are cutting their dependence on avid readers, which makes sense because avid readers are the ones that can appreciate indie bookstores and that benefit the most from ebooks. (Or online retail, with its gigantic inventory.) Of course, the side-effect is that they are also *increasing* their dependence on casual readers who can get their needs met pretty much anywhere.

That is why I expect that if B&amp;N were to go away (I&#039;m skeptical, BTW, they&#039;re not *that* close to the edge) it wouldn&#039;t be a really big deal except for the folks losing their jobs. Avid readers would find their books with indies or online and the casual readers would still get their bestsellers. And the BPHs would barely notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple basic facts: even today, the bulk of publishing revenues come from the high-volume, casual reader driven &#8220;bestsellers&#8221;. (50 Shades, etc). Those are available everywhere, which is why they amass such a high sales volume.<br />
The value of deep-catalog bookstores is highest for avid readers. They are the ones who are more likely to go to bookstores looking for &#8220;something good to read&#8221; and morelikely to pickup a midlist/backlist title whereas casual readers are more likely to go when they&#8217;re looking for something specific. Usually a word-of-mouth or acclaimed title.<br />
We agree there?<br />
The reason B&amp;N has been reducing the floor space dedicated to books isn&#8217;t because they&#8217;re devoting less space to the bestsellers but because they are cutting back on the slow-moving midlist/backlist. In the process they are cutting their dependence on avid readers, which makes sense because avid readers are the ones that can appreciate indie bookstores and that benefit the most from ebooks. (Or online retail, with its gigantic inventory.) Of course, the side-effect is that they are also *increasing* their dependence on casual readers who can get their needs met pretty much anywhere.</p>
<p>That is why I expect that if B&amp;N were to go away (I&#8217;m skeptical, BTW, they&#8217;re not *that* close to the edge) it wouldn&#8217;t be a really big deal except for the folks losing their jobs. Avid readers would find their books with indies or online and the casual readers would still get their bestsellers. And the BPHs would barely notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael W. Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1227980</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael W. Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1227980</guid>
		<description>Wow! B&amp;N&#039;s woes stimulated a major response from Teleread fans.

I agree with those who pointed out that B&amp;N&#039;s limited international presence doesn&#039;t explain its declining U.S. sales. I suspect the major factor there is that more people who buy books as gifts do so online and, when they think online, they think Amazon.

B&amp;N also seems to be displaying a less-than-impressive enthusiasm for ebooks. In very early December, I published Hospital Gowns and Other Embarrassments: A Teen Girl&#039;s Guide to Hospitals in both print and digital formats. The results are revealing.

Given the ebook directly, Amazon literally processed and released the digital version overnight, while Apple took about a week. The minor ebook distributors, Sony, Kobo, Diesel etc, download it from Smashwords within a week and sold it shortly thereafter.

B&amp;N took almost a month to download the digital version from Smashwords (Dec. 28), and a week later it still isn&#039;t available online, although the print version has long been there. 

That sends a message to savvy ebook buyers. If you want to get an ebook quickly after its release, don&#039;t buy a Nook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! B&amp;N&#8217;s woes stimulated a major response from Teleread fans.</p>
<p>I agree with those who pointed out that B&amp;N&#8217;s limited international presence doesn&#8217;t explain its declining U.S. sales. I suspect the major factor there is that more people who buy books as gifts do so online and, when they think online, they think Amazon.</p>
<p>B&amp;N also seems to be displaying a less-than-impressive enthusiasm for ebooks. In very early December, I published Hospital Gowns and Other Embarrassments: A Teen Girl&#8217;s Guide to Hospitals in both print and digital formats. The results are revealing.</p>
<p>Given the ebook directly, Amazon literally processed and released the digital version overnight, while Apple took about a week. The minor ebook distributors, Sony, Kobo, Diesel etc, download it from Smashwords within a week and sold it shortly thereafter.</p>
<p>B&amp;N took almost a month to download the digital version from Smashwords (Dec. 28), and a week later it still isn&#8217;t available online, although the print version has long been there. </p>
<p>That sends a message to savvy ebook buyers. If you want to get an ebook quickly after its release, don&#8217;t buy a Nook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Semple</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1227974</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Semple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1227974</guid>
		<description>B&amp;N should be able to be successful with only a US market (just as Kobo is successful in Canada). Given the fact that each new country requires its own business entity, has its own rules and regulations, and that rights of sale must be negotiated separately with publishers for each country, it is not a sure thing that it can be done profitably, and economies of scale will be elusive. Apple and Google, and to a large extent, Amazon, have a foot in the door in many locales and ebooks are just an extension of what they are already doing. B&amp;N doesn&#039;t have that. So I respectfully disagree with the premise of the article.
Why are they having problems? They don&#039;t have the synergies and resources of Apple, Google, and Amazon. They have no appeal to people who aren&#039;t B&amp;N customers to begin with. B&amp;N customers who wanted to make the move to digital have already done so, and so the pool of potential new customers is shrinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B&amp;N should be able to be successful with only a US market (just as Kobo is successful in Canada). Given the fact that each new country requires its own business entity, has its own rules and regulations, and that rights of sale must be negotiated separately with publishers for each country, it is not a sure thing that it can be done profitably, and economies of scale will be elusive. Apple and Google, and to a large extent, Amazon, have a foot in the door in many locales and ebooks are just an extension of what they are already doing. B&amp;N doesn&#8217;t have that. So I respectfully disagree with the premise of the article.<br />
Why are they having problems? They don&#8217;t have the synergies and resources of Apple, Google, and Amazon. They have no appeal to people who aren&#8217;t B&amp;N customers to begin with. B&amp;N customers who wanted to make the move to digital have already done so, and so the pool of potential new customers is shrinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilynn Byerly</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1227964</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilynn Byerly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1227964</guid>
		<description>Surprisingly, according to articles I&#039;ve read in the trade press, it&#039;s Costco that sells a majority of the bestsellers at non-bookstore outlets.

Places like Target and Walmart are fine for lead titles in most genre lines like romance, but they don&#039;t have the selection even a small bookstore has, nor do they sell genres like science fiction, and they have peculiar tastes about what is and isn&#039;t acceptable.  Some romance publishers have had to change a cover they considered too racy while at the same time, they sell erotica like 5O SHADES.  

Plus, these stores are only interested in what make the most profit with the least space.  The day that books stop selling to their satisfaction, they are gone with as little fanfare as a towel color that is no longer popular.

And, it will be very easy for books not to make enough profit to satisfy them because books have a very small markup of around 3-5%.  

When you consider that some furniture has a 1000% to 5000% markup which allows huge profits even with buyer-perceived bargains and other products have similar markup values, that 3-5% is pretty dang pathetic.  

And in bookstores like B&amp;N, that&#039;s why you see so much space which offers novelties like games and other nonbook items because they do have such a high profit involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprisingly, according to articles I&#8217;ve read in the trade press, it&#8217;s Costco that sells a majority of the bestsellers at non-bookstore outlets.</p>
<p>Places like Target and Walmart are fine for lead titles in most genre lines like romance, but they don&#8217;t have the selection even a small bookstore has, nor do they sell genres like science fiction, and they have peculiar tastes about what is and isn&#8217;t acceptable.  Some romance publishers have had to change a cover they considered too racy while at the same time, they sell erotica like 5O SHADES.  </p>
<p>Plus, these stores are only interested in what make the most profit with the least space.  The day that books stop selling to their satisfaction, they are gone with as little fanfare as a towel color that is no longer popular.</p>
<p>And, it will be very easy for books not to make enough profit to satisfy them because books have a very small markup of around 3-5%.  </p>
<p>When you consider that some furniture has a 1000% to 5000% markup which allows huge profits even with buyer-perceived bargains and other products have similar markup values, that 3-5% is pretty dang pathetic.  </p>
<p>And in bookstores like B&amp;N, that&#8217;s why you see so much space which offers novelties like games and other nonbook items because they do have such a high profit involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1227963</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1227963</guid>
		<description>@Felix Torres:

I generally agree with you, but suggesting that the hopelessly meager selection of book titles at the local WalMart, Target or grocery story (Maybe 200 titles) is at all equivalent to a decent bookstore is a stretch.

Yes, it is a sales outlet...for only a handful of major titles. I think book publishers would almost be better off not offering these titles to WalMart &amp; Target since they can only sell a handful of titles to them.

These limited selections have drained away a LOT of sales for B&amp;N/Borders stores...but probably not so much profitability since these books were often sold at a steep discount to get traffic and hopefully convince people to buy backlist while they were there).

The end of B&amp;N is not the end of print publishing...but boy is it going to fragment the industry. I wonder if the end of B&amp;N would make the industry look a lot more like the comic book industry -- a couple of major distributors who wield incredible power and nothing but independent stores, with a constant cycle of existing stores closing and (often undercapitalized) new stores opening. I don&#039;t think that&#039;s going to be particularly good for publishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Felix Torres:</p>
<p>I generally agree with you, but suggesting that the hopelessly meager selection of book titles at the local WalMart, Target or grocery story (Maybe 200 titles) is at all equivalent to a decent bookstore is a stretch.</p>
<p>Yes, it is a sales outlet&#8230;for only a handful of major titles. I think book publishers would almost be better off not offering these titles to WalMart &amp; Target since they can only sell a handful of titles to them.</p>
<p>These limited selections have drained away a LOT of sales for B&amp;N/Borders stores&#8230;but probably not so much profitability since these books were often sold at a steep discount to get traffic and hopefully convince people to buy backlist while they were there).</p>
<p>The end of B&amp;N is not the end of print publishing&#8230;but boy is it going to fragment the industry. I wonder if the end of B&amp;N would make the industry look a lot more like the comic book industry &#8212; a couple of major distributors who wield incredible power and nothing but independent stores, with a constant cycle of existing stores closing and (often undercapitalized) new stores opening. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s going to be particularly good for publishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert T.</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/barnes-noble/the-real-reason-barnes-noble-is-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1227961</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=76425#comment-1227961</guid>
		<description>Add unbelievably bad customer service to the above mix and you have a recipe for failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add unbelievably bad customer service to the above mix and you have a recipe for failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 555/585 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2013-05-23 03:46:52 -->