Here, from Wired News. See .pdf of decison from the Sixth Court of Appeals. The court, among other things, didn’t want to get into the definition of “journalist” in connection with a source-shielding law As I see it, Apple should be ashamed of itself for such thuggish behavior. Excerpt from Wired News:
The case began in late 2004, when Apple Insider and PowerPage published drawings, artists’ sketches, pricing and release dates for a planned product codenamed “Asteriod.” Incensed, Apple lawyers sued the anonymous sources of the information as Doe defendants, and promptly issued subpoenas to the bloggers’ ISPs seeking any e-mail pertaining to Asteroid, in a bid to unmask the leakers.
