<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morning Roundup — Stories you may have missed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/amazon/morning-roundup-stories-you-may-have-missed-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/amazon/morning-roundup-stories-you-may-have-missed-10/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:27:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lowney</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/amazon/morning-roundup-stories-you-may-have-missed-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1218858</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Lowney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.com/?p=74142#comment-1218858</guid>
		<description>Regarding Amazon&#039;s deletion of author-on-author reviews, I suppose that they are trying to neutralize back scratching and back stabbing so as to protect their customers from skewed opinion.  However, this is very wrong on at least two counts.  Authors aren&#039;t necessarily dishonest  and customers aren&#039;t necessarily gullible.  Might it not be better to simply label the reviewer as a writer than to indict him or her?  Better yet, have that label link to a writer/reviewer&#039;s Amazon profile if they have one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Amazon&#8217;s deletion of author-on-author reviews, I suppose that they are trying to neutralize back scratching and back stabbing so as to protect their customers from skewed opinion.  However, this is very wrong on at least two counts.  Authors aren&#8217;t necessarily dishonest  and customers aren&#8217;t necessarily gullible.  Might it not be better to simply label the reviewer as a writer than to indict him or her?  Better yet, have that label link to a writer/reviewer&#8217;s Amazon profile if they have one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 319/350 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2013-05-24 12:32:13 -->