http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/journalism-moving-on-lineand-to-wikipedia/ News & views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:45:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/journalism-moving-on-lineand-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1162060 Yang-May Ooi Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:40:42 +0000 http://www.teleread.org/2010/03/28/journalism-moving-on-lineand-to-wikipedia/#comment-1162060 The quality of any publication online or off depends on its contributors. The problem with Wikipedia is that non-experts can purport to be experts so if more academics and other experts can contribute to it and trust is built up basedo on reliable articles/ sources/ citations etc, then that makes it a much more valuable source of information. The quality of any publication online or off depends on its contributors. The problem with Wikipedia is that non-experts can purport to be experts so if more academics and other experts can contribute to it and trust is built up basedo on reliable articles/ sources/ citations etc, then that makes it a much more valuable source of information.

]]> http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/journalism-moving-on-lineand-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1161894 Ben Mon, 29 Mar 2010 06:51:51 +0000 http://www.teleread.org/2010/03/28/journalism-moving-on-lineand-to-wikipedia/#comment-1161894 Wikipedia itself as a primary source is unsuitable for academic use, but you'd be a fool if you ignored potentially good sources that articles site. I don't think anyone ever considered that unacceptable. Wikipedia itself as a primary source is unsuitable for academic use, but you’d be a fool if you ignored potentially good sources that articles site. I don’t think anyone ever considered that unacceptable.

]]>