<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon, other US e-publishers canvas UK literary agents for e-book rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2010/03/06/amazon-other-us-e-publishers-canvas-uk-literary-agents-for-e-book-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/2010/03/06/amazon-other-us-e-publishers-canvas-uk-literary-agents-for-e-book-rights/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix Torres</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/2010/03/06/amazon-other-us-e-publishers-canvas-uk-literary-agents-for-e-book-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-1159294</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix Torres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/03/06/amazon-other-us-e-publishers-canvas-uk-literary-agents-for-e-book-rights/#comment-1159294</guid>
		<description>No mention made of exactly what rights are being negotiated; UK-only, US-equivalent, Canada, global? Or of what version of the book; the author&#039;s manuscript, the edited &quot;proofed&quot; version from the treeware edition? Makes a big difference.

Looks like disintermediation accelerating.

If the BPHs insist on a business model likely to choke off ebook sales, well, why not remove them from the decision-making process by offering up their slice of the pie directly to the author? The fact that they&#039;re going after back-catalog titles likely to pre-date e-rights clauses should make it an effective wedge to distance established authors from the publishers.

I expect lawsuits to follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mention made of exactly what rights are being negotiated; UK-only, US-equivalent, Canada, global? Or of what version of the book; the author&#8217;s manuscript, the edited &#8220;proofed&#8221; version from the treeware edition? Makes a big difference.</p>
<p>Looks like disintermediation accelerating.</p>
<p>If the BPHs insist on a business model likely to choke off ebook sales, well, why not remove them from the decision-making process by offering up their slice of the pie directly to the author? The fact that they&#8217;re going after back-catalog titles likely to pre-date e-rights clauses should make it an effective wedge to distance established authors from the publishers.</p>
<p>I expect lawsuits to follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/11 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2010-09-10 05:11:00 -->