<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do we not read as much anymore because the Internet has sapped our attention spans?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164402</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164402</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a natural skeptic, too.  But there&#039;s a difference, in my opinion, between being a skeptic and being a sucker...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a natural skeptic, too.  But there&#8217;s a difference, in my opinion, between being a skeptic and being a sucker&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve smith</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164385</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164385</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s ok steve, I wouldn&#039;t have expected you to check it out, only because there is one considerable diffrences between us and you, we check every avenues of information and make up our own mind by what we see from all angles. Have you ever heard the word Xenophobia, I can change an idea your scared of anything beyond your idea of reality. Just like the skeptic society. Everythings wrong fake and false untill you decide it&#039;s genuine.
Sounds harsh but I just get borard of hearing the same old dribble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ok steve, I wouldn&#8217;t have expected you to check it out, only because there is one considerable diffrences between us and you, we check every avenues of information and make up our own mind by what we see from all angles. Have you ever heard the word Xenophobia, I can change an idea your scared of anything beyond your idea of reality. Just like the skeptic society. Everythings wrong fake and false untill you decide it&#8217;s genuine.<br />
Sounds harsh but I just get borard of hearing the same old dribble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164369</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164369</guid>
		<description>I never said the web was adversely affecting me... it&#039;s not.  I use it, and when I&#039;m done, I turn it off and do other things.  Look again at the threads, and you&#039;ll see it is fred, Gayle, (some other) Steve and farang who have a problem turning it off.

And thanks for letting me know rense.com is a conspiracy site... now I know not to be bothered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never said the web was adversely affecting me&#8230; it&#8217;s not.  I use it, and when I&#8217;m done, I turn it off and do other things.  Look again at the threads, and you&#8217;ll see it is fred, Gayle, (some other) Steve and farang who have a problem turning it off.</p>
<p>And thanks for letting me know rense.com is a conspiracy site&#8230; now I know not to be bothered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virtual</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164365</link>
		<dc:creator>virtual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164365</guid>
		<description>Has carr considered that he has been putting up with bad writing all this time? and bad writers have been getting away with &quot;it&quot;?

Carr whines again -- I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I’d spend hours strolling through long stretches of prose. That’s rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages

So why do people get involved in this nonsense like twitter and facebook which are simply CIA-NSA info-siphoning attention-killing and time-wasting useless activities?

The whole friending unfriending thing is as bad as watching CNN or FOX and expecting anything other than disinformation, lies and more time-wasting nonsense

Answer me ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has carr considered that he has been putting up with bad writing all this time? and bad writers have been getting away with &#8220;it&#8221;?</p>
<p>Carr whines again &#8212; I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I’d spend hours strolling through long stretches of prose. That’s rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages</p>
<p>So why do people get involved in this nonsense like twitter and facebook which are simply CIA-NSA info-siphoning attention-killing and time-wasting useless activities?</p>
<p>The whole friending unfriending thing is as bad as watching CNN or FOX and expecting anything other than disinformation, lies and more time-wasting nonsense</p>
<p>Answer me &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve smith</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164360</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164360</guid>
		<description>Steve jordan the site I found it on is rense.com, but I warn you, if you but into the government Line of education and controlled media you won&#039;t like it much. But yeah I&#039;m with bonnie on this one, I&#039;ve learnt more with the net than I ever did at school I can comprehend almost anything that&#039;s thrown at me and google anything I don&#039;t know the answer too. It&#039;s what has sped up everything from consciousness, awareness, technology and many other things some of us take for granted! For instance, CERN, from the net they have created a super net capable of sending large amounts of data to where it&#039;s needed and that device is going to revolutionise the way in which we live. It&#039;ll show what theories are right and which are wrong and thus opening the door to many more discoveries and breakthroughs. Also mail is instant where as post was slow and cumbersome to scientists and people of the like that gave us what we have today. And besides if you honestly think the way you do why are you on here talking to us? Your using the very thing your slating. If it effects you the way you claim then get off and try some mental exercies to help your brain overcome this horrible addictive thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve jordan the site I found it on is rense.com, but I warn you, if you but into the government Line of education and controlled media you won&#8217;t like it much. But yeah I&#8217;m with bonnie on this one, I&#8217;ve learnt more with the net than I ever did at school I can comprehend almost anything that&#8217;s thrown at me and google anything I don&#8217;t know the answer too. It&#8217;s what has sped up everything from consciousness, awareness, technology and many other things some of us take for granted! For instance, CERN, from the net they have created a super net capable of sending large amounts of data to where it&#8217;s needed and that device is going to revolutionise the way in which we live. It&#8217;ll show what theories are right and which are wrong and thus opening the door to many more discoveries and breakthroughs. Also mail is instant where as post was slow and cumbersome to scientists and people of the like that gave us what we have today. And besides if you honestly think the way you do why are you on here talking to us? Your using the very thing your slating. If it effects you the way you claim then get off and try some mental exercies to help your brain overcome this horrible addictive thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloudy</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164354</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164354</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s been linked at www.Rense.com, a site which proudly proclaims itself as having been identified by the U.S. government as the web&#039;s #1 conspiracy site.

I read it everyday.

And I find myself agreeing.  I&#039;ve been an avid reader since childhood, belong to my university alumni association just so that I can keep my library card and read the kind of scholarly works undergraduates will do anything to avoid - in several languages.  I ditched the TV years ago. And yet I have overdue library books and stacks of purchases, things I know will be fascinating once I actually start them, but what do I do when I get free time?  Turn on the Internet and start surfing. Meadows is right - it&#039;s doing something to my brain.

Now, back to work, oh, wait, I haven&#039;t checked www.whatreallyhappened.com yet......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s been linked at <a href="http://www.Rense.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Rense.com</a>, a site which proudly proclaims itself as having been identified by the U.S. government as the web&#8217;s #1 conspiracy site.</p>
<p>I read it everyday.</p>
<p>And I find myself agreeing.  I&#8217;ve been an avid reader since childhood, belong to my university alumni association just so that I can keep my library card and read the kind of scholarly works undergraduates will do anything to avoid &#8211; in several languages.  I ditched the TV years ago. And yet I have overdue library books and stacks of purchases, things I know will be fascinating once I actually start them, but what do I do when I get free time?  Turn on the Internet and start surfing. Meadows is right &#8211; it&#8217;s doing something to my brain.</p>
<p>Now, back to work, oh, wait, I haven&#8217;t checked <a href="http://www.whatreallyhappened.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatreallyhappened.com</a> yet&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164347</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164347</guid>
		<description>Sure seems like it&#039;s been re-linked from somewhere.  

As to the new comments: Any doctor will tell you that the Internet use in itself does not trigger a significant dopamine response... chemical imbalances do.  Going &quot;cold turkey&quot; from an addiction causes significant physiological distress and detoxification symptoms, which cutting someone off the internet does &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt;.  &lt;b&gt;To suggest the internet is somehow addictive, as a drug is addictive, is simply wrong.&lt;/b&gt;  

&quot;Internet addiction&quot; is a PR gag used to sell newspapers and magazines (ironically enough).  But in reality, this is an issue of behavior and focus, both of which can be gained (or regained) with desire, practice, and occasionally outside assistance.  Blaming outside influences is counter-productive, and will only make it harder to regain focus and re-balance behavior.

Or, to put it another way: &lt;i&gt;Get a grip.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure seems like it&#8217;s been re-linked from somewhere.  </p>
<p>As to the new comments: Any doctor will tell you that the Internet use in itself does not trigger a significant dopamine response&#8230; chemical imbalances do.  Going &#8220;cold turkey&#8221; from an addiction causes significant physiological distress and detoxification symptoms, which cutting someone off the internet does <i>not</i>.  <b>To suggest the internet is somehow addictive, as a drug is addictive, is simply wrong.</b>  </p>
<p>&#8220;Internet addiction&#8221; is a PR gag used to sell newspapers and magazines (ironically enough).  But in reality, this is an issue of behavior and focus, both of which can be gained (or regained) with desire, practice, and occasionally outside assistance.  Blaming outside influences is counter-productive, and will only make it harder to regain focus and re-balance behavior.</p>
<p>Or, to put it another way: <i>Get a grip.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164344</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164344</guid>
		<description>Out Attention span has shortened? From waht? From the boring lessons and classes we used to be forced to sit through? 

I will bet all I have that the majority of people here, have learned MORE outside regimented classes, where tptb&#039;s ideas, what they wanted us to learn, useless minutae, unrelated to life, repetitions, cremmed down our throats. We have learned MORE from the INTERNET than when we didn&#039;t have it! I KNOW this is true with all internet users.

Tptb, actually kept us dumbed down - and now that we&#039;re &quot;coming out of the farm,&quot; they want to force us back.

&quot;We actually resemble nothing so much as those legendary lab rats that endlessly pressed a lever.....&quot; 

To Emile Yoffe, of Slate: &quot;As the Indian said: &#039;Speak for yourself White Man.&#039; &quot; 

I&#039;m NOT a rat, I&#039;m a thinking, discerning Human Be-ing.

There is a plethora of spoutings from the Mass News Media and the Feds, claiming all kinds of negativity from the Internet, but all of this can bbe traced to the fact, that the Newspapers are losing money because the lies they print, the half-truths and obsfuscations, and just, censoreship.

And the Feds, intend to destroy the internet, because the Alternate News Media on the &#039;Net, presents the REAL happenings, historical and current. The Internet makes us, The People, aware of the stinking, corruption, the chicanery of Church and State! They think we are still in the ignorant, uneducated state of the poor &quot;peasants&quot; of the Middle Ages ( which btw, were kept that way by the very ones, who today, vilify the Internet, by any and all means.

As for me, it has been a blessing! One can choose, in a discerning way, to read e-books, or whatever. But it is our choice.  No person has to come along, to patronize us, instructing us, what is best.

Long Live the Internet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out Attention span has shortened? From waht? From the boring lessons and classes we used to be forced to sit through? </p>
<p>I will bet all I have that the majority of people here, have learned MORE outside regimented classes, where tptb&#8217;s ideas, what they wanted us to learn, useless minutae, unrelated to life, repetitions, cremmed down our throats. We have learned MORE from the INTERNET than when we didn&#8217;t have it! I KNOW this is true with all internet users.</p>
<p>Tptb, actually kept us dumbed down &#8211; and now that we&#8217;re &#8220;coming out of the farm,&#8221; they want to force us back.</p>
<p>&#8220;We actually resemble nothing so much as those legendary lab rats that endlessly pressed a lever&#8230;..&#8221; </p>
<p>To Emile Yoffe, of Slate: &#8220;As the Indian said: &#8216;Speak for yourself White Man.&#8217; &#8221; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m NOT a rat, I&#8217;m a thinking, discerning Human Be-ing.</p>
<p>There is a plethora of spoutings from the Mass News Media and the Feds, claiming all kinds of negativity from the Internet, but all of this can bbe traced to the fact, that the Newspapers are losing money because the lies they print, the half-truths and obsfuscations, and just, censoreship.</p>
<p>And the Feds, intend to destroy the internet, because the Alternate News Media on the &#8216;Net, presents the REAL happenings, historical and current. The Internet makes us, The People, aware of the stinking, corruption, the chicanery of Church and State! They think we are still in the ignorant, uneducated state of the poor &#8220;peasants&#8221; of the Middle Ages ( which btw, were kept that way by the very ones, who today, vilify the Internet, by any and all means.</p>
<p>As for me, it has been a blessing! One can choose, in a discerning way, to read e-books, or whatever. But it is our choice.  No person has to come along, to patronize us, instructing us, what is best.</p>
<p>Long Live the Internet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meadows</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164341</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164341</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little startled to see this relatively old article getting so much traffic again. Is it linked somewhere high-traffic? I&#039;d like to know so I can go and check out the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little startled to see this relatively old article getting so much traffic again. Is it linked somewhere high-traffic? I&#8217;d like to know so I can go and check out the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farang</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164323</link>
		<dc:creator>farang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164323</guid>
		<description>I agree with Nicholas Carr: I used to be an avid reader. Just lose myself, immerse myself in a novel, like a Tolkein book, and could actually visualize what I was reading. Hours on end, the only drawback finding a comfortable position to read in. Lost in deep thought, I would even visualize the book at work the next day, the chapters read and what occured, anxious to get back to it asap. And would usually read an interesting novel cover to cover in a day or two, no matter the length.

Now? I fidget, my mind wandering hither and yon...searching, not feeling fulfilled, good books left unfinished, while I roam around the internet looking for something *new* and *unique* to stimulate my brain. Like a lab rat.

I do indeed agree the internet changes the way we think. Um, TV and Radio are not interactive media, so saying the &#039;net is like them and they didn&#039;t change us is an absurd comparison. And yes, TV does change the way you think....that is it&#039;s FUNCTION now: to program YOU.

All that said: I can unplug the damn computer, and am not saying anything about restricting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Nicholas Carr: I used to be an avid reader. Just lose myself, immerse myself in a novel, like a Tolkein book, and could actually visualize what I was reading. Hours on end, the only drawback finding a comfortable position to read in. Lost in deep thought, I would even visualize the book at work the next day, the chapters read and what occured, anxious to get back to it asap. And would usually read an interesting novel cover to cover in a day or two, no matter the length.</p>
<p>Now? I fidget, my mind wandering hither and yon&#8230;searching, not feeling fulfilled, good books left unfinished, while I roam around the internet looking for something *new* and *unique* to stimulate my brain. Like a lab rat.</p>
<p>I do indeed agree the internet changes the way we think. Um, TV and Radio are not interactive media, so saying the &#8216;net is like them and they didn&#8217;t change us is an absurd comparison. And yes, TV does change the way you think&#8230;.that is it&#8217;s FUNCTION now: to program YOU.</p>
<p>All that said: I can unplug the damn computer, and am not saying anything about restricting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost of Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164308</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost of Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164308</guid>
		<description>Turn on
Tune in
Drop out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turn on<br />
Tune in<br />
Drop out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve smith</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164307</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164307</guid>
		<description>Ok guys for a start I find this article very wrong In it&#039;s asertion that the Internet causes Consentration levels to decline and the &#039;bombardment of infomation&#039; is the cause by things like Twitter and other rubbish. The eyes alone send 10 million bits of information per second alone to the brain which is recorded though we only have conscious access to about 20 or 30 bits of that we still take on a massive amount every day, so to assert that the Internet can cause you to lose function of your mind in some way is absurd! It&#039;s more likely to be the crap people watch and do that&#039;s mind numbing enough to dumb a person down or just old age. I spend time looking at and researching astro physics, quantum physics, ancient history and various other things which I wouldn&#039;t have known before the Internet revolution. So no, I don&#039;t agree with this article one bit. People just need to use the net more constructively than just goin online to say they went shopping or a friend took a dump! Their, their own worst enemy not the net, the net if anything is mind expanding!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok guys for a start I find this article very wrong In it&#8217;s asertion that the Internet causes Consentration levels to decline and the &#8216;bombardment of infomation&#8217; is the cause by things like Twitter and other rubbish. The eyes alone send 10 million bits of information per second alone to the brain which is recorded though we only have conscious access to about 20 or 30 bits of that we still take on a massive amount every day, so to assert that the Internet can cause you to lose function of your mind in some way is absurd! It&#8217;s more likely to be the crap people watch and do that&#8217;s mind numbing enough to dumb a person down or just old age. I spend time looking at and researching astro physics, quantum physics, ancient history and various other things which I wouldn&#8217;t have known before the Internet revolution. So no, I don&#8217;t agree with this article one bit. People just need to use the net more constructively than just goin online to say they went shopping or a friend took a dump! Their, their own worst enemy not the net, the net if anything is mind expanding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164292</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164292</guid>
		<description>I agree with this article and was aware of the problem already. I&#039;ve read some of the articles referenced also. I was always an avid reader, but lately have found it hard to either read anything lengthy or write anything lengthy, even though in total I write more than ever before, short comments and longer ones, in forums such as this for example.

I&#039;ve begun to force myself to pick up books, valuable ones on subjects which I have become interested in due to the internet, but solid books all the same. It is not unlike trying to break a drug habit actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this article and was aware of the problem already. I&#8217;ve read some of the articles referenced also. I was always an avid reader, but lately have found it hard to either read anything lengthy or write anything lengthy, even though in total I write more than ever before, short comments and longer ones, in forums such as this for example.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve begun to force myself to pick up books, valuable ones on subjects which I have become interested in due to the internet, but solid books all the same. It is not unlike trying to break a drug habit actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164261</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164261</guid>
		<description>I agree and have been experiencing the same lack of concentration and desire to spend more time online checking news sites, etc. And, you are on to something with the rat study. Kids are being exposed to such high levels of stimulation it will be interesting to see if they are even capable of reading in ten years or so. Watch the Nickelodeon or MTV awards that are marketed to pre-teens. There&#039;s more stimulation than a casino. That can&#039;t be good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree and have been experiencing the same lack of concentration and desire to spend more time online checking news sites, etc. And, you are on to something with the rat study. Kids are being exposed to such high levels of stimulation it will be interesting to see if they are even capable of reading in ten years or so. Watch the Nickelodeon or MTV awards that are marketed to pre-teens. There&#8217;s more stimulation than a casino. That can&#8217;t be good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-1164258</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2010/02/11/do-we-not-read-as-much-anymore-because-the-internet-has-sapped-our-attention-spans/#comment-1164258</guid>
		<description>I think Steve Jordan is full of crap, to be quite frank with you.  If you have a device AVAILABLE to you that actually stimulates Dopamine and other NT&#039;s, then it&#039;s actually BEYOND the control of many to cease that activity.  It&#039;s actually an ADDICTION as strong as heroin for some.  Now couple that with the fact that, in this day and age, most people cannot perform many of their daily functions without going on-line (especially as society shifts more and more towards an on-line existence).  So, no, I would have to say that Steve is full of crap and denying the reality of the situation which is one of almost FORDED PLIGHT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Steve Jordan is full of crap, to be quite frank with you.  If you have a device AVAILABLE to you that actually stimulates Dopamine and other NT&#8217;s, then it&#8217;s actually BEYOND the control of many to cease that activity.  It&#8217;s actually an ADDICTION as strong as heroin for some.  Now couple that with the fact that, in this day and age, most people cannot perform many of their daily functions without going on-line (especially as society shifts more and more towards an on-line existence).  So, no, I would have to say that Steve is full of crap and denying the reality of the situation which is one of almost FORDED PLIGHT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 545/571 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-09 22:36:03 -->
