Maybe we should be hurting the authors
February 5, 2010 | 11:25 am
By Joanna
Notice anything missing in the publisher press releases about their ‘victory’ in the Amazon/Macmillan battle?
John Scalzi writes to other authors. John Sargent is writing to ‘authors, illustrators and literary agents.’ Rupert Murdoch is speaking directly about his own bottom line.
What all of these seeming insiders are forgetting though is that without the paying customer, there would not be a bottom line! Authors, absent a paying audience, would be sticking it in a drawer like Emily Dickinson did, writing for their own personal satisfaction.
Where is the voice of the customer in all of this? What are they doing to try and make things better for themselves?
On forums such as Mobileread, this blog and elsewhere, customers are mobilizing and trying to advocate for themselves. The book review blog Dear Author is hosting a survey for ebook readers which it plans to take to an upcoming conference, this blog continues to serve as an aggregator for news relating to the Great Price War of 2010, and readers at Mobileread are organizing initiatives such as a boycott on all $15 books, and an interesting campaign to catch author and agent attention by deluging offending books with 1-star reviews.
And what has the response been? Plaintive replies, in every venue, about how these attempts to mobilize the reading community ‘hurt authors’ and we should just accept that there are aspects to doing business that we don’t understand and our only option is to shut up and pay.
To that, I say nonsense, and—this is going to be an unpopular opinion, but it needs to be said—maybe ‘hurting’ the authors is what we actually need to do for awhile. I don’t mean ‘hurt’ them through piracy or anything ridiculous like that. But we have to get someone to see that this fear of all things digital is costing authors actual sales from people who want to spend legitimate money. If a spate of 1-star Amazon reviews is what it will take to send panicked authors running to their agents and publishers demanding change for us, I say Power to the People.
I’ve written to retailers, to publishers, and to authors themselves about things like geographical restrictions preventing me from buying a book I wanted to pay for, or being unable to buy a series because it was only available from book 2 onward and I couldn’t find book 1. Responses ranged from outright ignoring at worst to polite ‘thanks for letting us know, too bad that’s not my responsibility and I can’t really help you.’
Nobody seems to care about how the customers are feeling, and how sad they are—for themselves, deprived of books, and for the authors too, whom they would read, whom they would support, whom they would generate profit for if only someone would let them.
All our efforts to advocate for ourselves have been in vain—nobody is noticing the letters, the blog posts, the veritable shouting from the internet rooftops begging someone to help us out, or if they can’t, then tell us whom we can write to who actually can help us. But judging from the angry responses to the thread at Mobileread, people are noticing the 1-star reviews!
Does it hurt authors? Maybe. I think an intelligent book-buyer could see at a glance where the 1 star is coming from and judge for themselves if they’re really going to cost an author a sale over it, so I am not sure how much bottom-line pain an action such as this would cost.
But it would certainly be less than what they are losing now to people who want to buy legitimate e-books and are prevented from doing so. All I know is, complaining from readers hasn’t gotten us anywhere yet. Maybe the pressure of authors at last mobilized to help us finally will.
Note to new readers: Welcome! Please note that first-time comments go into a moderation queue, and some posts may be caught by our spamtrap. However, we check for moderated posts and spam false positives frequently. Please don’t double-post!



Previous

SUBSCRIBE TO RSS
Comments:
I am an author and an ebook enthusiast. I understand the concern and anger, and the arguments made are in many cases perfectly logical and understandable, but the problem is that many readers simply have no idea how commercial publishing works. Nobody does until they actually are commercially published. (Hint: is is extremely unglamorous.) The suggestions are perfectly logical, but unfortunately the workings of commercial publishing are not based on logic. However, at this time it is the best system for authors to get their books into the hands of readers.
Until ebooks become way more prominent than they are (and I hope they do!), change will be incremental. There are good reasons for this that are transparent to the public. I personally see the agency model as a huge change that in the long run will work out really well for all parties, except perhaps Amazon in its quest for world dominance. (And don’t think their resistance to the agency model is anything else. I don’t hold that against them–they are simply acting as a business–but that is what is going on. There is way more to it than simple consumer pricing.)
Also, I think consumer rage is premature until we see how the dynamic pricing is implemented. It might end up being better than it is now. MMPBs that are priced at $9.99 on Amazon might end up being $5.99.
Coming to Teleread from a country where eReaders & ebooks are virtually unknown one would hope for some insight into this. Instead I get this waste of pixels. Starting to wonder if owning a Kindle doesn’t lead to a softening of the brain. Ah well at least these curious characters are a perfect example of late western man, totally self absorbed, wanking away in their basements while devouring the stolen goods produced by others. History of the west really.
Let’s all agree that there are idiots and wrong-headed loud mouths on all sides of the issue. Don’t blame everyone else who is an author/reader/publisher, etc. for what a few people say.
Many of us are trying to have a civil discussion. At those places where the person in charge of the blog or whatever is being a jerk, leave to save your blood pressure and your time.
Send people to places like Teleread where you are, at least, heard.
As to authors picking the right kind of publishers, let me give you this scenario. A big publisher wants to buy your book. He will give you great distribution in all the bookstores in paper and will pay you a nice advance on your royalties. However, if you don’t give him your ebook rights the deal is off.
eBook rights these days are worth almost nothing in comparison to paper rights. So it’s a bunch of bucks and a major boost to your career on one hand and next to nothing on the other?
That is literally the choice an author has about ebook rights if they want to sell their book to any major publisher in the US.
Another thing no one is talking about is supporting the authors and publishers who are giving ebook readers exactly what they want. My publishers, who are known for their quality product, all sell books way under $9.99 with no DRM and multiformat, but I’ve not heard from any of them that sales are skyrocketing. My sales are steady, but I’m not seeing a huge spike because my books don’t have DRM, are reasonably priced, are available in English all over the world. No other author I know has.
You don’t have to buy my books, guys, but, at least support the publishers who are giving you what you want.
Wow, I disagree with most of that. I wrote up something earlier about this whole mess, and honestly? I think that a lot of the blame lies with Macmillan and Amazon for this one, with Amazon far more at fault. The publishers have whatever right they want to sell their products (that’s right, books are products) at whatever rate that they care to value them at. It makes sense to sell an e-book for a little cheaper, I think, but I don’t believe that Amazon.com should reduce the value at a loss for the publishers and then the authors, simply to drive sales to the Kindle device.
The authors? Well, they’re pretty helpless here, because they depend on the publishers to put together a good product that people want to buy, and they don’t make much off of each book sale anyway. In punishing a publisher, Amazon.com has incurred some collateral damage.
My post: http://jeditrilobite.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/ebooks-value
The real problem is that it is extremely labor-intensive to produce a well-written book. So in order for authors to make a reasonable amount of money for their efforts, they have to sell a lot of books… or prices and margins must be high…or both.
The second part of the problem is that there aren’t enough book buyers to support the number of books produced. Yes, many book buyers purchase more titles than they are able to read, but even so, there isn’t enough demand to fairly compensate all authors who publish through traditional channels.
And that’s why this battle rages and will continue to do so. Too many people fighting over a too-small pie.
I am in total agreement that we the readers have a viewpoint here, and it’s not being heard.
But I don’t agree that we should side with Amazon on this. Honestly, when this started I was probably thinking I was in Amazon’s camp. I like cheaper ebooks too. But when Amazon decided to remove my ability to purchase any books from Macmillion as a negotiating tactic, it taught me real quick where the real priorities are.
Macmillion may charge what it wants for its books. I’ll buy them or not, as I see value in their offering. If I don’t buy them, they’ll learn and adjust and the market continues.
But when Amazon chooses to deny me the ability to purchase Macmillion physical books (which are not under dispute) and ebooks (for which their contract has not expired) as a negotiating tactic, I have to recognize that I’m just a tool in Amazon’s arsenal. One who can’t buy the things he wants to buy, which makes me very dissatisfied.
This isn’t about Ebooks. Ebook pricing will get negotiated and worked out. Negotiations like this happen every day. But I won’t accept being controlled and abused by Amazon like this going forward.
If you feel otherwise, join Amazon Shall Not Censor Me: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=wall&ref=search&gid=273995541707
The difference between ebooks and physical books is like paper napkins and linen napkins in a cafe. There’s a drop in overhead (printing costs = cleaning costs,) but it’s not as big as everyone thinks. Really, it’s not. It’s not even an arcane mystery; it’s just that the actual costs are complex. I doubt you’ll believe me, but I’ll try my best to explain.
The true costs of a book, physical or digital, are like those of a dish in a cafe. Is that the price of the raw ingredients plus the gas or electricity required to cook them? Well, those are a part of it — the ideas and energy in the finished draft — but they’re only a part. You also have the raw ingredients and gas or electricity that was used in developing that final recipe. And less tangibly, you have: a) the time and toil the chef (author) invests in coming up with the new recipe (novel); b) the time and toil invested in setting up and maintaining a viable cafe (publishing mechanism — and this could be BPH, indie or author-controlled venture,) that can serve that dish to the public plus the resources required to achieve this; c) the time and toil invested in bringing those two together OR the time and toil added where they’re *already* together in an author-owned venture (because doing two jobs adds a friction factor); d) the time and toil invested by waiting and kitchen staff (editorial, design teams, etc.) in actually creating the individual dish to serve the customer’s order. The difference between the total costs if you present it with linen napkins (hardback) or if you present it with cotton napkins (paperback) or if you present it with disposable paper napkins (ebook) are minimal.
It’s as simple as that. Authors know this because, yes, we’re “insiders”; we see that work taking place first-hand. Some of us have published with the BPHs, indie presses *and* through our own schemes, so we know the pros and cons of each. I’m experimenting with a direct-to-consumer project right now, if that does anything to convince you that I’m on-board with the whole new media revolution. But I’ll lay odds that this attempt to explain will meet blank denials and bitter invective. Why? Because this is what all the authors are saying, many detailing the costs in stage-by-stage breakdowns, real facts and figures; and the response they’re getting is largely obstinate and obnoxious.
If ebook readers won’t listen to authors on this for even a second, but instead rage incoherently and spit venom at anyone who tries to explain, how do you expect authors to react? You don’t listen to a mob with pitchforks; you either try and shout some sense into them, stand your ground and fight, or head for cover.
Adam Gott Says: Book publishers = Just another bunch of dinosaurs failing to adapt to the times. (see RIAA and MPAA for further reference)
Adam, there’s pretty good reason to think that this negotiation is happening exactly because Macmillion wants to avoid exactly what happened to the music industry. From someone who knows from experience: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/susan-piver/the-macmillan-vs-amazon-t_b_444879.html
In honesty, everyone who thinks that Macmillion is being the bully should read this article. It covers this topic much better than I am capable of.
@ Marilynn Byerly
“You don’t have to buy my books, guys, but, at least support the publishers who are giving you what you want.”
That’s exactly the sort of atitude I’d like to see from more authors. Thank you. I do support publishers like Baen and Night Shade, which sell DRM free ebooks at webscription.net.
@ Mags
“Also, I think consumer rage is premature until we see how the dynamic pricing is implemented. It might end up being better than it is now. MMPBs that are priced at $9.99 on Amazon might end up being $5.99.”
And that’s exactly what I’m tired of getting from authors. I would love me some dynamic pricing! But it’s not what experience has taught me and other ebook readers to expect from Macmillan given how it has handled it’s agency model so far, by maintaining ebook prices higher than the prices of their already released MMPBs.
I am surprised more people in the comments don’t see that as soon as decent ebook readers are available for a reasonable price (sub-$100), ebooks books will be Napsterized. So any pricing model that doesn’t take into account that the competitive price point will be *free* is doomed to fail. Charging $15, or even $10 for a digital book file is about as ridiculous as charging $0.99 for a single music track. You will get some dedicated, mostly older, fans but most people will simply sample from the vast free library of the Internet.
As with music, the barriers to entry for publishing have dropped to almost zero. In other words, just about any good writer can write and publish his own ebooks without the parasitic intermediary formerly known as “publishing houses.” The days when those houses added value — physical printing and distribution — are numbered. Any writer who needs an editor will be able to hire one, maybe for a small percentage of their total sales.
At some point, a company will spring up that specializes in selling unlocked, open format ebooks for maybe $2-3 each, with most of the money going to the authors. Or maybe a subscription based ebook company will emerge; all you can read for $10 a month. At this point, readers and authors will both win. Authors will get to keep more of the money brought in by their own creativity, while readers will be incentivized to sample more deeply and broadly than they ever could under the old “scarcity” model.
In any case, I would strongly discourage anyone to buy a Kindle or any other locked, proprietary device which takes away rights you currently have with physical books. Ebooks should be more, not less, flexible with regards sharing and distribution. That quality of digital information is a feature, not a bug. Any business model that suppresses that feature is an enemy to authors, readers and lovers of free speech everywhere.
To Martin: “If you want to be intelligent, just keep to the policy of not buying anything you think is too pricey. No one ever said you didn’t have the right to do that.” This assumes you have the right to buy something in the first place. It is not the price I care about, it’s the availability. If you read my post, I write about things like geographical restrictions and books not being available in the first place.
To Willem: Who said anything about stolen goods? I am talking about readers trying to BUY books with money and being turned away, and you think readers like me are the problem? I bought over $100 books last year. They may be ebooks instead of print books (although I bought those too—I prefer my non-fiction in paper) but that’s still real money *I* earned and gave to real authors. *I* am not the problem here.
Marilynn: I still disagree with you on several things, but I respect your thoughtful dialogue and you are read, we do need to be devoting some of energy to supporting authors and publishers who do get it. That’s part of why I started my blog and part of what’s driving my latest website effort. I want to draw attention to those authors who are doing it right. It’s just frustrating when there is an author you enjoy and they are not in this stable of people.
If I truly didn’t care about authors and wanted to steal, I wouldn’t be writing articles like this. I would not care about price or availability or anything like that because I would be going to the Darknet and you’d never here boo from me. It just baffles me that here I am with money, and authors don’t seem more concerned that nobody will take it from me…
ficbot Says: It just baffles me that here I am with money, and authors don’t seem more concerned that nobody will take it from me…
Um… trust me, the Authors would be happy to take your money. You seem a bit confused. You can buy those books from many places other than Amazon, and the publisher and authors will get your money.
Amazon is the only one preventing you from buying things, in their attempt to control the market.
No author is doing anything to prevent you from buying books.
@ Hal Duncan
Yes, many readers have been raging morons, unwilling to hear, and authors have every right to be angry at those people. I for one am glad that authors have taken time to explain some of the costs in publishing, and I don’t deny that they’re the ones being hurt the most (at least for now). I should also point out that I don’t believe hurting authors even more is a good thing and that I have in fact bought paper copies of some Macmillan authors as a way of supporting them.
But this is not a one way street. Not everyone has been a raging moron, many people are simply expressing concern over the fact that so far their experiences with Macmillan’s agency model have been very bad and that while authors seem to be taking Sargent’s promise of flexible pricing at face value, they’re not. Most authors responses to those raising concerns was either dismissive or outright offensive. While I understand that there’s nothing they can do about it I’d expect them to at least acknowledge these concerns.
Lots of good points here… two of the things I wanted to say Thiago said perfectly in his last comment… so I concur.
To Hal Duncan about the costs of ebooks. You are undoubtedly right about the cost of ebooks not being significantly lower than physical books. Even when you include the ‘hidden’ cost of printing more books than actually sell.
What I think is missing in that analysis are the other benefits publishers get selling ebooks over physical books… huge benefits. Namely, no used book resales, no book loaning, and significantly limited library usage.
I believe (perhaps naively) that these three advantages are a HUGE win for publishers (and authors in the miserly royalties they do receive from publishers) with ebooks.
ebooks should cost less than physical books… always. Period.
IMHO
“If a spate of 1-star Amazon reviews is what it will take to send panicked authors running to their agents and publishers demanding change for us, I say Power to the People.”
Ficbot,
How about helping us authors speak up to our publishers and retailers? As has been well said here, only those authors who make publishers rich have any clout. The rest of us have to worry we’ll be booted out if our sales aren’t high enough. But if consumers talked directly to publishers and retailers like Amazon, you could help amplify our quite vulnerable voices.
You may or may not know this: publishers rarely communicate with their authors. Once a book has been published, you’re lucky ever to hear from them again. Even before the book is published, the same can be true. I’ve never quite figured out why. I thought the relationship was supposed to be a partnership, not an employer-employee thing. Authors can try to talk to their publishers, but unless you’re dealing with a small house, they usually won’t be interested in communicating unless there’s money in it for them.
Publishers, tell me if I’m wrong here. This is my experience, anyway.
PeaceLove said: As with music, the barriers to entry for publishing have dropped to almost zero. In other words, just about any good writer can write and publish his own ebooks without the parasitic intermediary formerly known as “publishing houses.” The days when those houses added value — physical printing and distribution — are numbered. Any writer who needs an editor will be able to hire one, maybe for a small percentage of their total sales.
Peace, I understand what you mean. But it’s apparent to me that you haven’t produced a serious music piece before, have you? Yes you can now get quality recording gear at a reasonable price, but that doesn’t ensure that you have the skills to produce reasonable output. The change in output ensures that decent musicians can produce adequate output on a CD within their budget. It does nothing to ensure that a decent musician can produce an excellent CD (one that you would actually buy) within their budget. (I’ve been a musician most of my life, and I formerly ran an website publishing independent musicians for no cost to them, so I know a bit about this topic)
As for how this relates to authors, the issues seem to be much the same. Many people have written at length on this topic. Please educate yourself a bit on the issues, starting at these great points:
http://whatever.scalzi.com/2010/02/03/why-in-fact-publishing-will-not-go-away-anytime-soon-a-deeply-slanted-play-in-three-acts/
http://www.jlake.com/2010/02/04/writingpublishing-what-my-publisher-does-for-me-and-why-i-wont-just-quit/
http://blog.laptopmag.com/ebook-price-war
Good points, Mike Orange, and here’s another one for all concerned: the cost of shipping and handling physical books.
The cost of shipping adds unnecessary overhead to a book. Add to that the issues of damaged books and mistakes filling orders, and you’ve got a lot more wasted time and money.
Of course there is the digital infrastructure necessary to support the distribution of ebooks, which isn’t free (Chris Anderson and his nonsense notwithstanding), but at least ebook transmission is virtually instant, and there are no torn or grease-covered pages to worry about.
Marilynn “As to authors picking the right kind of publishers, let me give you this scenario. A big publisher wants to buy your book. He will give you great distribution in all the bookstores in paper and will pay you a nice advance on your royalties. However, if you don’t give him your ebook rights the deal is off. ”
This is exactly my point though… if you make a deal with the devil don’t be surprised if it doesn’t turn out well. The big publishers don’t care about authors or consumers, just profit. That’s fine, but know who you are dealing with.
That may mean making tough choices. If there is a big publisher offering a fantastic advance and they’re the only ones interested in your book, it will be hard to say no and look for a smaller publisher who does care about you. If you make the easy choice and then that publisher does something evil, it reflects on you for choosing them. It *is* the author’s choice.
Now, let’s not get into multi-book deals and situations where a company starts to act evil after you are already committed… that’s obviously going to happen but probably not to many people. Those people are stuck, to be sure.
If you can get your head round the cafe analogy, by the way, it might help explain where publishers have foolishly let readers get entirely the wrong idea of what they’re actually paying for.
Think of linen napkins as hardback and cotton napkins as paperback. The expensive linen napkins have to be dry-cleaned, while the cheap cotton ones can be chucked in a washing machine, right? Just like hardbacks cost more to produce than paperbacks, right? So the customer sees these two options, hardback and paperback, one double the price of the other, and thinks that since they’re buying this physical thing, well, the price difference must be because one is of a higher quality than the other, because one costs more to produce. But that’s *not* the case.
The printing cost differences between hardback and mass-market paperback are negligable. The hb is sold at a high mark-up, while the pb is sold at a low, low, *low* mark-up, and the difference in valuation is largely down to when they’re available. You’re paying a premium price for a hb to get it hot off the press, as a new release. With the pb, released a year down the line, you’re paying less because it’s been out for a year already, so demand has tailed off, so the publisher chucks out a discount version to eke more sales from those who’re less keen.
In the cafe analogy, it’s like the linen napkins come with table service, but the cotton napkins come with the self-service buffet. One menu option is more expensive than another, but it’s nothing to do with the napkins, and *everything* to do with the difference in the service. Just as with the hardback, you’re really paying not to wait, with the linen napkin table-service, you’re paying to be waited *on*.
Problem is, with books, publishers have let readers imagine that it’s all about the physical costs of these different quality products. They imagine that a 2010 pb being half the price of the 2009 hb reflects a substantial disparity in physical costs of production and distribution. When that mindset is applied to ebooks, readers think that *surely* by scratching those costs entirely you should be able to offer the digital version for even less! But the truth is it’s just a matter of switching from linen/cotton napkins to disposable paper ones.
The agency model Macmillan are pushing is to have both table-service and self-service buffet available with paper instead of linen, charged at comparable rates. The alternative, they said, if Amazon insisted on a fixed price on all meals that come with paper napkins, is to *only do the self-service buffet with paper napkins*. Why? If you’re only willing to pay $10 a meal, you’re not paying the waiter’s wages. If you want the waiter, if you don’t want to wait, they have every right to ask a premium price for that premium service.
To Jo Rhett and Paula:
1) “You seem a bit confused. You can buy those books from many places other than Amazon, and the publisher and authors will get your money.” NO, *you* seem a bit confused. You can’t but every book from every store for every platform. You can’t even buy it in every country. I can site you examples of individual books, if that would help you. It’s not just prices that have people concerned, it is AVAILABILITY. Look at Covey and is exclusivity deal with Amazon—non-Kindle customers cannot buy these ebooks. Or the series I mentioned, where the first book in the series is not available and the others are. I would buy it if I could, but they won’t sell it to me. Or talk to the Brit at Mobile Read who had $400 of books on his wish list that they wouldn’t sell to him because he’s in the UK. If you think price is the only issue here, you are tragically mistaken.
2) “How about helping us authors speak up to our publishers and retailers?” Did you read about the part whee I said I have done this and nobody cared? I emailed the retailers and they told me it wasn’t up to them. I wrote back and asked them for the contact information, or job title even, of the person who is WAS up to. They said they would get back to me. They never did. I personally emailed seven authors about geographically restricted books. Four of them did not write back. Two wrote back and said it wasn’t up to them and oh well. One of them actually did a very active role, spoke to several people and got back to me. The book was later made available. I bought it.
I buy a *lot* of books. I spent a *lot* of money. I would spend even *more* money if somebody, somewhere, somehow would get a clue and address the availability issue—both in terms of issues like DRM, exclusivity and geographical restrictions and in terms of pricing issues like books which have been in $6 mass market paperback for over a decade being issued at $15 ebooks. The goal here should not be to gouge the customer or to block them from obtaining and reading a book. The goal here should be to make it as easy as possible for the customer to spend their money on your stuff. And if you, as an author, want that to happen, then you have to work WITH your readers to resolve these issues. Because I am telling you, I and others have devoted tons of time to being loyal fans and trying to resolve them ourselves, and it’s gotten us NOWHERE.
Bravo. I have been against 1-star reviews as a method because reviews are meant to be of the book themselves, but since the large publishers and so many of the authors in public forum posts disparage buying-customers’ thinking, what’s being ‘reviewed’ is the arrogance of the sudden 50% rise in book prices we should ‘accept’ graciously and as some form of charity for authors, never mind the effect of the economy on any of us — meaning we are reviewing the fact that the book is unavailable to us for half a year at all even if we want to buy it legally — or it is now priced out of range, with justification by too many authors. They’ll have to live with the results of the bad PR they themselves engage in on forums everywhere.
Add that this whole action is so obviously the brainchild of an Apple exec who ASKED the publishers to raise their prices (WSJ story before the iPad launch) and the unseemly rat-pack of publishers now gathered to make sure Amazon and then every other bookseller MUST go with their $15 strategy does not help — especially not with a smiling Steve Jobs telling Walt Mossberg in a videotaped talk on launch day that the prices at Amazon and Apple would be the same — the prices he had asked the publishers to use once offering them a better cut of the book — meaning they’d have to raise prices to get what Apple wants out of it while ignorantly thinking anyone will make more money out of a situation in which customers who wanted to buy their books are no longer buying them.
– http://bit.ly/kwmacm2
Ficbot,
I really appreciate that you’ve contacted retailers and tried to get them to listen. And if my trade books were an issue, I’d work like crazy to try to resolve any problems with them, but they’re too old and geeky to have been issued in ebook form.
Having said that, if there *is* an issue with my Kindle books, which I publish myself, I will yell and scream at Amazon and try to get that fixed; if the problem is with the way I’ve formatted the books, I’ll correct whatever it is. So if there is a problem with my stuff, please let me know: Paula Berinstein’s ebooks and articles at the Kindle store.
I’m not surprised that one consumer alone doesn’t get anywhere by contacting retailers and Amazon. There has to be some sort of mass/group action on the part of book buyers. You know how that goes: most people behind the counter just don’t care.
But how about this? A letter-writing campaign by consumers to Jeff Bezos and the heads of publishing companies.
And how about this too: come on The Writing Show, which I produce and host, and talk about this issue. You want to start a letter-writing campaign or get suggestions from listeners on how to approach the problem? Come and talk to us! Email me: paula@writingshow.com.
@ Hal Duncan
“The agency model Macmillan are pushing is to have both table-service and self-service buffet available with paper instead of linen, charged at comparable rates.”
I understand that ebook prices souldn’t necessarily be lower than that of physical books, I think most people pushing that argument are seriously overestimating costs of physical book producing and shipping (if these costs were so high, physical books would probably be even more expensive), though I think publishers are at least partially to blame for that misconception, with all that “prices are raising because of paper costs” talk.
I even understand that there may be a number of people willing to pay more to have an ebook the moment it is released (Heck, depending on the author I might be one of them) and that it makes sense for the publishers to explore that.
What I don’t understand, as someone who is an ebook reader for years now, is why should I look forward to Macmillan’s agency deal with Amazon when my own experience (and that of so many others) with this model is not as good as it’s being painted? Will I really have “self-service buffet” if I wait until the MMPB release to buy the ebook? Or will things remain as they are and I will have to pay for “table-service” for years and years.
@Thiago: The new pricing paradigm hasn’t even been implemented yet. It’s too early to tell whether it will work. As the way the books are provided to the retailers will change, it is not unnatural to expect the pricing changes to come across as well. If, AFTER THE PARADIGM IS PUT INTO PLACE, the dynamic pricing doesn’t happen, then you have something to complain about.
@ Mags
“The new pricing paradigm hasn’t even been implemented yet. It’s too early to tell whether it will work. As the way the books are provided to the retailers will change, it is not unnatural to expect the pricing changes to come across as well. If, AFTER THE PARADIGM IS PUT INTO PLACE, the dynamic pricing doesn’t happen, then you have something to complain about.”
Fictionwise has been working under Macmillan’s agency model for years now and no such thing as dynamic pricing has happened. (I’m getting tired of repeating that, by the way). So, yes, I think I do have some reason to be concerned.