<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More tablet rumors; Amazon to change Kindle revenue split?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/12/10/more-tablet-rumors-amazon-to-change-kindle-revenue-split/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/more-tablet-rumors-amazon-to-change-kindle-revenue-split/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meadows</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/more-tablet-rumors-amazon-to-change-kindle-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-1150689</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/12/10/more-tablet-rumors-amazon-to-change-kindle-revenue-split/#comment-1150689</guid>
		<description>Right, I should have been more clear about that. The split for &lt;i&gt;self-published&lt;/i&gt; Amazon books is 70/30 in Amazon&#039;s favor. I&#039;ll amend the article to fix that.

As for the other, well, &lt;i&gt;book&lt;/i&gt; publishers is what the original article says. Wouldn&#039;t it be interesting if Apple were going to try to sweet-talk the publishers into switching from list price model to percent-of-revenue model? I seem to recall hearing that the wholesale price of the books is half the hardcover price, which would mean that the publishers could make the same amount of money by charging only 5/7 of hardcover price for their e-books. Of course, that&#039;s still not going to get them down to Amazon&#039;s price of $9.99, and it seems more likely the publishers would be happy to keep right on charging list price but make more money per copy sold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, I should have been more clear about that. The split for <i>self-published</i> Amazon books is 70/30 in Amazon&#8217;s favor. I&#8217;ll amend the article to fix that.</p>
<p>As for the other, well, <i>book</i> publishers is what the original article says. Wouldn&#8217;t it be interesting if Apple were going to try to sweet-talk the publishers into switching from list price model to percent-of-revenue model? I seem to recall hearing that the wholesale price of the books is half the hardcover price, which would mean that the publishers could make the same amount of money by charging only 5/7 of hardcover price for their e-books. Of course, that&#8217;s still not going to get them down to Amazon&#8217;s price of $9.99, and it seems more likely the publishers would be happy to keep right on charging list price but make more money per copy sold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wallcraft</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/more-tablet-rumors-amazon-to-change-kindle-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-1150683</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wallcraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/12/10/more-tablet-rumors-amazon-to-change-kindle-revenue-split/#comment-1150683</guid>
		<description>The original reports may have said &quot;book publishers&quot; but this seems to be about newspapers and magazines.  Amazon takes the majority of the revenue from these on the Kindle.  Books are entirely different, because for them the return to the publisher is based on list price, not the net revenue.  If, for example, Amazon is losing money on a bestseller, then by definition the return to the publisher is above 100% of revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original reports may have said &#8220;book publishers&#8221; but this seems to be about newspapers and magazines.  Amazon takes the majority of the revenue from these on the Kindle.  Books are entirely different, because for them the return to the publisher is based on list price, not the net revenue.  If, for example, Amazon is losing money on a bestseller, then by definition the return to the publisher is above 100% of revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 298/329 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-09 19:34:28 -->
