<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pixel Qi vs. the Kindle: Which is the better display for YOUR e-booking?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/11/22/pixel-qi-vs-the-kindle-which-is-the-better-display-for-your-e-booking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/pixel-qi-vs-the-kindle-which-is-the-better-display-for-your-e-booking/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:56:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/pixel-qi-vs-the-kindle-which-is-the-better-display-for-your-e-booking/comment-page-1/#comment-1149593</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/11/22/pixel-qi-vs-the-kindle-which-is-the-better-display-for-your-e-booking/#comment-1149593</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Bill. Since you&#039;re a veteran e-book researcher, it would be great if you shared a few more details in areas such as character sharpness and text-background contrast---especially in the power-saving e-book mode. How is the contrast of the e-book mode compared to the OLPC XO machines?

I&#039;m hardly surprised that &quot;it looked pretty darn good.&quot; 

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Bill. Since you&#8217;re a veteran e-book researcher, it would be great if you shared a few more details in areas such as character sharpness and text-background contrast&#8212;especially in the power-saving e-book mode. How is the contrast of the e-book mode compared to the OLPC XO machines?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hardly surprised that &#8220;it looked pretty darn good.&#8221; </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Janssen</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/pixel-qi-vs-the-kindle-which-is-the-better-display-for-your-e-booking/comment-page-1/#comment-1149564</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Janssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/11/22/pixel-qi-vs-the-kindle-which-is-the-better-display-for-your-e-booking/#comment-1149564</guid>
		<description>David, I saw the Pixel Qi screen in person in October, and it looked pretty darn good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, I saw the Pixel Qi screen in person in October, and it looked pretty darn good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/pixel-qi-vs-the-kindle-which-is-the-better-display-for-your-e-booking/comment-page-1/#comment-1149560</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/11/22/pixel-qi-vs-the-kindle-which-is-the-better-display-for-your-e-booking/#comment-1149560</guid>
		<description>Amen about the column issue, Dan! E Ink machines, too, not just Pixel Qi, can display multiple columns (and good on the Times for caring about this!). But Pixel Qi right now can do a lot more if you go by the specs. I&#039;ve asked to be put on the list to see the tech in person, although I may already have come close as the past owner of an OLPC laptop. Thanks. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen about the column issue, Dan! E Ink machines, too, not just Pixel Qi, can display multiple columns (and good on the Times for caring about this!). But Pixel Qi right now can do a lot more if you go by the specs. I&#8217;ve asked to be put on the list to see the tech in person, although I may already have come close as the past owner of an OLPC laptop. Thanks. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan E. Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/pixel-qi-vs-the-kindle-which-is-the-better-display-for-your-e-booking/comment-page-1/#comment-1149556</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan E. Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/11/22/pixel-qi-vs-the-kindle-which-is-the-better-display-for-your-e-booking/#comment-1149556</guid>
		<description>david, what i like about the photo of the Pixel Q, which by the way, also has big office in Taipei, I know John, her husband, is the 3-column format. What i really wish the Internet would do is give us readable pages that were in 3 column or 4 column formats like newspapers and magazines do. Bill Hill, former Microsoft guru now surfing in Hawaii forever, has said that 16 years ago the internet took a wrong turn by giving us scolling pagaination, long huge screens with WIDE WIDE margins, so there are about 40 words to a line, much too long for the human eye, and a 3 column format, with 10 words to a line, is what the human eye likes. i hope PIXEL Q does this. Bill Hill says the Internet masters took a wrong turn 16 years ago, but it can still be fixed. He is working on it, too. Long live the 3 column, and 4 column format....that is what READING should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>david, what i like about the photo of the Pixel Q, which by the way, also has big office in Taipei, I know John, her husband, is the 3-column format. What i really wish the Internet would do is give us readable pages that were in 3 column or 4 column formats like newspapers and magazines do. Bill Hill, former Microsoft guru now surfing in Hawaii forever, has said that 16 years ago the internet took a wrong turn by giving us scolling pagaination, long huge screens with WIDE WIDE margins, so there are about 40 words to a line, much too long for the human eye, and a 3 column format, with 10 words to a line, is what the human eye likes. i hope PIXEL Q does this. Bill Hill says the Internet masters took a wrong turn 16 years ago, but it can still be fixed. He is working on it, too. Long live the 3 column, and 4 column format&#8230;.that is what READING should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 336/363 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 12:15:05 -->
