<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revised Google Book Settlement presented to the Court: Limited to U.S., Canada, Australia, U.K.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/11/14/revised-google-book-settlement-presented-to-the-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/revised-google-book-settlement-presented-to-the-court/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pastore</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/revised-google-book-settlement-presented-to-the-court/comment-page-1/#comment-1149087</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pastore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 03:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=32084#comment-1149087</guid>
		<description>This revised version is better than the previous version, but is it good enough ? Does it still give Google an enormous advantage regarding the orphaned works, or does it level the playing field ?  Does it comply with U.S. copyright law, or (as in the earlier version) does it place Google in the stratosphere (or, in the Googlesphere), miles above the laws ?

Peter Brantley and Victoria Stauss have written a number of insightful articles on this subject: I&#039;d like to see what Brantley and Strauss are saying about this new version of the settlement. 

Michael Pastore
50 Benefits of Ebooks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This revised version is better than the previous version, but is it good enough ? Does it still give Google an enormous advantage regarding the orphaned works, or does it level the playing field ?  Does it comply with U.S. copyright law, or (as in the earlier version) does it place Google in the stratosphere (or, in the Googlesphere), miles above the laws ?</p>
<p>Peter Brantley and Victoria Stauss have written a number of insightful articles on this subject: I&#8217;d like to see what Brantley and Strauss are saying about this new version of the settlement. </p>
<p>Michael Pastore<br />
50 Benefits of Ebooks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 279/305 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 03:12:34 -->
