<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The danger of shortened urls &#8211; Internet Archive to the rescue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/11/13/the-danger-of-shortened-urls-internet-archive-to-the-rescue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/the-danger-of-shortened-urls-internet-archive-to-the-rescue/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pastore</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/the-danger-of-shortened-urls-internet-archive-to-the-rescue/comment-page-1/#comment-1149088</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pastore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=32073#comment-1149088</guid>
		<description>I agree wholeheartedly with Steve here: it&#039;s too risky to trust these services with URLs that I might want to see a few years from now. 

Here is an article (from July 2008) comparing &quot;URL truncators&quot; ... how many of them are still in business ?

http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/short-url-truncators/

Also, with the full link, at one glance I can get more information. For example, if I see anywhere in the link: 

teleread.com 

then I know I will be clicking to a source that is interesting, reliable, authoritative and trustworthy. 

If I see only 

http://preview.tinyurl.com/yaoymqo

then I don&#039;t know where I&#039;m heading. Clicking on that mysterious link might take me to an unsavory web site, where I would have a lot of &#039;splainin&#039; to do.

All that said: if you must use a shortened URL, then the 301works.org project looks like a very good idea.

Michael Pastore
50 Benefits of Ebooks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholeheartedly with Steve here: it&#8217;s too risky to trust these services with URLs that I might want to see a few years from now. </p>
<p>Here is an article (from July 2008) comparing &#8220;URL truncators&#8221; &#8230; how many of them are still in business ?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/short-url-truncators/" rel="nofollow">http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/short-url-truncators/</a></p>
<p>Also, with the full link, at one glance I can get more information. For example, if I see anywhere in the link: </p>
<p>teleread.com </p>
<p>then I know I will be clicking to a source that is interesting, reliable, authoritative and trustworthy. </p>
<p>If I see only </p>
<p><a href="http://preview.tinyurl.com/yaoymqo" rel="nofollow">http://preview.tinyurl.com/yaoymqo</a></p>
<p>then I don&#8217;t know where I&#8217;m heading. Clicking on that mysterious link might take me to an unsavory web site, where I would have a lot of &#8216;splainin&#8217; to do.</p>
<p>All that said: if you must use a shortened URL, then the 301works.org project looks like a very good idea.</p>
<p>Michael Pastore<br />
50 Benefits of Ebooks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/the-danger-of-shortened-urls-internet-archive-to-the-rescue/comment-page-1/#comment-1149061</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=32073#comment-1149061</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d think the e-book community (and a few others), having had the experience of buying from a web vendor and losing your purchase when the site made a change or went out of business, would be more leery of services like this.  IMO, better off to just buy a &lt;i&gt;real&lt;/i&gt; URL, even if it isn&#039;t ideal in name, than to risk losing a horde of tiny URLs down the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d think the e-book community (and a few others), having had the experience of buying from a web vendor and losing your purchase when the site made a change or went out of business, would be more leery of services like this.  IMO, better off to just buy a <i>real</i> URL, even if it isn&#8217;t ideal in name, than to risk losing a horde of tiny URLs down the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 298/322 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 07:28:14 -->
