<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should the New York Times ditch its sports section?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/11/12/should-the-new-york-times-ditch-its-sports-section/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/new-york-times/should-the-new-york-times-ditch-its-sports-section/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:35:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill McHale</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/new-york-times/should-the-new-york-times-ditch-its-sports-section/comment-page-1/#comment-1149022</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill McHale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/11/12/should-the-new-york-times-ditch-its-sports-section/#comment-1149022</guid>
		<description>Well, I think the basic issue here is that very few people read articles from every section of a news paper.  While the New York Times is not necessarily the choice of sports fans, there are other papers who would experience a crippling loss of circulation if they cut out their sports sections.

Perhaps, News Papers might do better if they allow people to subscribe to the sections they want to read.  Readers would then feel like they were getting a better value for their money since they are only getting stuff that interests them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think the basic issue here is that very few people read articles from every section of a news paper.  While the New York Times is not necessarily the choice of sports fans, there are other papers who would experience a crippling loss of circulation if they cut out their sports sections.</p>
<p>Perhaps, News Papers might do better if they allow people to subscribe to the sections they want to read.  Readers would then feel like they were getting a better value for their money since they are only getting stuff that interests them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Adin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/new-york-times/should-the-new-york-times-ditch-its-sports-section/comment-page-1/#comment-1149014</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Adin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/11/12/should-the-new-york-times-ditch-its-sports-section/#comment-1149014</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a very long time home delivery subscriber to the NYT, longer than 10 years, and in all that time, I have never read anything in the sports section (I don&#039;t even read it in my local Gannett rag). So as far as I&#039;m concerned, the sports section could disappear and all I&#039;d notice is that the paper was thinner.

However, there are other sections that the NYT could also discard as far as I&#039;m concerned, such as Home, Design, Fashion and Real Estate. There are several others that could be added from the Sunday edition as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a very long time home delivery subscriber to the NYT, longer than 10 years, and in all that time, I have never read anything in the sports section (I don&#8217;t even read it in my local Gannett rag). So as far as I&#8217;m concerned, the sports section could disappear and all I&#8217;d notice is that the paper was thinner.</p>
<p>However, there are other sections that the NYT could also discard as far as I&#8217;m concerned, such as Home, Design, Fashion and Real Estate. There are several others that could be added from the Sunday edition as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Janes</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/new-york-times/should-the-new-york-times-ditch-its-sports-section/comment-page-1/#comment-1148999</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Janes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/11/12/should-the-new-york-times-ditch-its-sports-section/#comment-1148999</guid>
		<description>ditto. sports is a waste of paper. who CARES? let sports go digital . sure . good riddance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ditto. sports is a waste of paper. who CARES? let sports go digital . sure . good riddance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Vertrees</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/new-york-times/should-the-new-york-times-ditch-its-sports-section/comment-page-1/#comment-1148981</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Vertrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/11/12/should-the-new-york-times-ditch-its-sports-section/#comment-1148981</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t read the sports coverage in any paper, so if the NYT drops its sports section, I certainly won&#039;t miss it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t read the sports coverage in any paper, so if the NYT drops its sports section, I certainly won&#8217;t miss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 336/361 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 02:31:15 -->
