<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: List of magazines available on Google Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/11/05/list-of-magazines-available-on-google-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/list-of-magazines-available-on-google-books/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:35:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/list-of-magazines-available-on-google-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1148516</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=31598#comment-1148516</guid>
		<description>For archives and research of les temps perdu, this is great. BUT: &quot;Why do we need to read current 2009 and 2010 magazines and newspapers on screens? Is watching a DVD of a movie on a small screen om the back of a seat in an airplane a real movie-going experience? No way. So why do we need e-readers that can &quot;screen&quot; magazines and newspapers for us to read. The real magazine is best. The real newspaper is best. Are we short of paper? No. We do not need these gadgets. Enough already. Let magazines be magazines. Let blogs on screens by blogs. Screens are cool. Ereaders are cool. They have their place. But let&#039;s not replace magazines and newspapers. Say it aint so! Let real paper books be real books. Use e-readers like a portable computer screen. Be screeny. Long live screeniness! Use computers and the like for hunting and gathering. Keep paper reading alive. Don&#039;t put everything on screens. That is the wrong way to go. (Is anyone listening? Hello, hello! Anybody home?)&quot;

http://zippy1300.blogspot.com/2009/11/why-do-we-need-to-read-magazines-and.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For archives and research of les temps perdu, this is great. BUT: &#8220;Why do we need to read current 2009 and 2010 magazines and newspapers on screens? Is watching a DVD of a movie on a small screen om the back of a seat in an airplane a real movie-going experience? No way. So why do we need e-readers that can &#8220;screen&#8221; magazines and newspapers for us to read. The real magazine is best. The real newspaper is best. Are we short of paper? No. We do not need these gadgets. Enough already. Let magazines be magazines. Let blogs on screens by blogs. Screens are cool. Ereaders are cool. They have their place. But let&#8217;s not replace magazines and newspapers. Say it aint so! Let real paper books be real books. Use e-readers like a portable computer screen. Be screeny. Long live screeniness! Use computers and the like for hunting and gathering. Keep paper reading alive. Don&#8217;t put everything on screens. That is the wrong way to go. (Is anyone listening? Hello, hello! Anybody home?)&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://zippy1300.blogspot.com/2009/11/why-do-we-need-to-read-magazines-and.html" rel="nofollow">http://zippy1300.blogspot.com/2009/11/why-do-we-need-to-read-magazines-and.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 279/304 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 01:55:26 -->
