<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whew! FTC apparently NOT policing INDEPENDENT blogs that run book reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/10/19/whew-ftc-apparently-not-policing-independent-blogs-that-run-book-reviewers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/whew-ftc-apparently-not-policing-independent-blogs-that-run-book-reviewers/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:02:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/whew-ftc-apparently-not-policing-independent-blogs-that-run-book-reviewers/comment-page-1/#comment-1147296</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/10/19/whew-ftc-apparently-not-policing-independent-blogs-that-run-book-reviewers/#comment-1147296</guid>
		<description>Raja99, yes, Paul Verghaegen, a novelist in Atlanta at Georgia Tech Uni, orignally from Belgium, very very sharp guy, see his blog too.

http://verhaeghen.blogspot.com/2009/10/were-all-luddites-again.html 

-- danny

see this too, from me, for HUMOR: re KINDLING as a verb:

and my HOGWASH statement here: serious:

http://zippy1300.blogspot.com/2009/10/hogwash-statement-by-danny-bloom.html 


http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=kindle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raja99, yes, Paul Verghaegen, a novelist in Atlanta at Georgia Tech Uni, orignally from Belgium, very very sharp guy, see his blog too.</p>
<p><a href="http://verhaeghen.blogspot.com/2009/10/were-all-luddites-again.html" rel="nofollow">http://verhaeghen.blogspot.com/2009/10/were-all-luddites-again.html</a> </p>
<p>&#8211; danny</p>
<p>see this too, from me, for HUMOR: re KINDLING as a verb:</p>
<p>and my HOGWASH statement here: serious:</p>
<p><a href="http://zippy1300.blogspot.com/2009/10/hogwash-statement-by-danny-bloom.html" rel="nofollow">http://zippy1300.blogspot.com/2009/10/hogwash-statement-by-danny-bloom.html</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=kindle" rel="nofollow">http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=kindle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raja99</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/whew-ftc-apparently-not-policing-independent-blogs-that-run-book-reviewers/comment-page-1/#comment-1147175</link>
		<dc:creator>Raja99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/10/19/whew-ftc-apparently-not-policing-independent-blogs-that-run-book-reviewers/#comment-1147175</guid>
		<description>&quot;...literature is going the way of the opera.&quot;

Danny, that&#039;s a great quote! Can you tell us who said that (so I can give proper credit)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;literature is going the way of the opera.&#8221;</p>
<p>Danny, that&#8217;s a great quote! Can you tell us who said that (so I can give proper credit)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/whew-ftc-apparently-not-policing-independent-blogs-that-run-book-reviewers/comment-page-1/#comment-1147174</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/10/19/whew-ftc-apparently-not-policing-independent-blogs-that-run-book-reviewers/#comment-1147174</guid>
		<description>re books and literature, a certain someone who writes novels,, tells me in email and on his blog:

&quot;Interesting too is the premise that reading should serve some purpose (fostering critical thinking was mentioned; indeed, an increase in logical-mathematical ability is often observed after absorbing Dan Brown&#039;s magical offerings; a lifetime of reading DeLillo has left me with quite amazing powers of deduction and abstraction). We read -- those of us who do -- because we enjoy. That&#039;s all. Again, whatever the medium. If you don&#039;t enjoy, you surf away. Simple as that. And now we simply have more doohickeys, moving images and sound and all, that allow such surfing, so that those who don&#039;t enjoy reading lengthy exposes or narratives don&#039;t have to. They were just pretending anyway, or else long lost to Harlan Coben. Is there anything tangible to suggest that prolonged exposure to Henry James makes one, well, a better human? (Whatever that may be?)

To conjecture, I would be surprised if literature is going the way of the dodo. What I do predict (not a hard prediction to make, methinks) is that literature is going the way of the opera. That process started long before computers and kindles landed in every lap. Bombing Bezos&#039;s hardware factories -- or Sony&#039;s, or Nintendo&#039;s -- won&#039;t do a thing for humankind. Would it?

Relax. It&#039;s called change. We humans have survived change for about a million years now. And if we don&#039;t, well what of it?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re books and literature, a certain someone who writes novels,, tells me in email and on his blog:</p>
<p>&#8220;Interesting too is the premise that reading should serve some purpose (fostering critical thinking was mentioned; indeed, an increase in logical-mathematical ability is often observed after absorbing Dan Brown&#8217;s magical offerings; a lifetime of reading DeLillo has left me with quite amazing powers of deduction and abstraction). We read &#8212; those of us who do &#8212; because we enjoy. That&#8217;s all. Again, whatever the medium. If you don&#8217;t enjoy, you surf away. Simple as that. And now we simply have more doohickeys, moving images and sound and all, that allow such surfing, so that those who don&#8217;t enjoy reading lengthy exposes or narratives don&#8217;t have to. They were just pretending anyway, or else long lost to Harlan Coben. Is there anything tangible to suggest that prolonged exposure to Henry James makes one, well, a better human? (Whatever that may be?)</p>
<p>To conjecture, I would be surprised if literature is going the way of the dodo. What I do predict (not a hard prediction to make, methinks) is that literature is going the way of the opera. That process started long before computers and kindles landed in every lap. Bombing Bezos&#8217;s hardware factories &#8212; or Sony&#8217;s, or Nintendo&#8217;s &#8212; won&#8217;t do a thing for humankind. Would it?</p>
<p>Relax. It&#8217;s called change. We humans have survived change for about a million years now. And if we don&#8217;t, well what of it?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Vertrees</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/whew-ftc-apparently-not-policing-independent-blogs-that-run-book-reviewers/comment-page-1/#comment-1147169</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Vertrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/10/19/whew-ftc-apparently-not-policing-independent-blogs-that-run-book-reviewers/#comment-1147169</guid>
		<description>I agree with Paula above. I sometimes write book reviews and then add a link to the book using my Amazon affiliate account. For all the work I put into my blog, I make pennies (if that) for my efforts. Hopefully the FTC realizes they have a lot bigger fish to fry. Sounds like their on the right track though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Paula above. I sometimes write book reviews and then add a link to the book using my Amazon affiliate account. For all the work I put into my blog, I make pennies (if that) for my efforts. Hopefully the FTC realizes they have a lot bigger fish to fry. Sounds like their on the right track though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula B.</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/whew-ftc-apparently-not-policing-independent-blogs-that-run-book-reviewers/comment-page-1/#comment-1147147</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/10/19/whew-ftc-apparently-not-policing-independent-blogs-that-run-book-reviewers/#comment-1147147</guid>
		<description>Considering how little most bloggers (and podcasters like me) make from affiliate sales, the whole thing is pretty ridiculous. And even if they/we were to resell the review copies they/we get (which I don&#039;t do), again, a lot of work for very little money. 

So I&#039;m encouraged by this latest info coming out of the FTC. Seems like they&#039;re trying to keep things in perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering how little most bloggers (and podcasters like me) make from affiliate sales, the whole thing is pretty ridiculous. And even if they/we were to resell the review copies they/we get (which I don&#8217;t do), again, a lot of work for very little money. </p>
<p>So I&#8217;m encouraged by this latest info coming out of the FTC. Seems like they&#8217;re trying to keep things in perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 355/380 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 13:34:41 -->
