<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: French publisher sues Google; specifies damages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/09/28/french-publisher-sues-google-specifies-damages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/french-publisher-sues-google-specifies-damages/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/french-publisher-sues-google-specifies-damages/comment-page-1/#comment-1145834</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=29557#comment-1145834</guid>
		<description>I would take this seriously. For good and bad, the French take artists, including writers, much more seriously than we do here in the more business-oriented states. I wouldn&#039;t want to be among the Google lawyers appearing before a French court.

It&#039;s hard to feel sorry for Google in this matter. The extension of book copyrights to digital media isn&#039;t that different from its early extension to movie rights and the like. If they&#039;re really wanted to stay legal rather than define by fiat what is legal, they could have come up with a test case involving a single book rather than millions. Then a lost wouldn&#039;t be that expensive and the legality would have been settled.
							OH! You&#039;re my new favorite blogger fyi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would take this seriously. For good and bad, the French take artists, including writers, much more seriously than we do here in the more business-oriented states. I wouldn&#8217;t want to be among the Google lawyers appearing before a French court.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to feel sorry for Google in this matter. The extension of book copyrights to digital media isn&#8217;t that different from its early extension to movie rights and the like. If they&#8217;re really wanted to stay legal rather than define by fiat what is legal, they could have come up with a test case involving a single book rather than millions. Then a lost wouldn&#8217;t be that expensive and the legality would have been settled.<br />
							OH! You&#8217;re my new favorite blogger fyi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/french-publisher-sues-google-specifies-damages/comment-page-1/#comment-1145815</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=29557#comment-1145815</guid>
		<description>I would take this seriously. For good and bad, the French take artists, including writers, much more seriously than we do here in the more business-oriented states. I wouldn&#039;t want to be among the Google lawyers appearing before a French court.

It&#039;s hard to feel sorry for Google in this matter. The extension of book copyrights to digital media isn&#039;t that different from its early extension to movie rights and the like. If they&#039;re really wanted to stay legal rather than define by fiat what is legal, they could have come up with a test case involving a single book rather than millions. Then a lost wouldn&#039;t be that expensive and the legality would have been settled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would take this seriously. For good and bad, the French take artists, including writers, much more seriously than we do here in the more business-oriented states. I wouldn&#8217;t want to be among the Google lawyers appearing before a French court.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to feel sorry for Google in this matter. The extension of book copyrights to digital media isn&#8217;t that different from its early extension to movie rights and the like. If they&#8217;re really wanted to stay legal rather than define by fiat what is legal, they could have come up with a test case involving a single book rather than millions. Then a lost wouldn&#8217;t be that expensive and the legality would have been settled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoB</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/french-publisher-sues-google-specifies-damages/comment-page-1/#comment-1145793</link>
		<dc:creator>MoB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=29557#comment-1145793</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t take it seriously... anyway, they are French... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t take it seriously&#8230; anyway, they are French&#8230; <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 321/349 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 04:43:12 -->
