<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finger Spam in Google scanned books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/09/21/finger-spam-in-google-scanned-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/finger-spam-in-google-scanned-books/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:30:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garson O'Toole</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/finger-spam-in-google-scanned-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1145448</link>
		<dc:creator>Garson O'Toole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=29122#comment-1145448</guid>
		<description>I have also seen scanned pages with fingers and other pages that are unreadable. In February of 2008 Google added the capability &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://booksearch.blogspot.com/2008/02/from-mailbag-report-scanning-errors-in.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;to report scanning errors via a link on each page&lt;/A&gt;.

At the time I sent an email to the Google Book Search team requesting the ability to report missing pages. They were agreeable and responsive, and now it is possible to report missing pages too.

There is a &quot;Feedback&quot; link for each page that is located near the upper right. If you click on it then you have two options for reporting: &quot;Part of the page is unreadable&quot; or &quot;Missing page&quot;. (The Feedback button location might vary based on browser/op-system. I am unsure. But the button should be visible somewhere.) 

Google is building a remarkably powerful system, but the forces arrayed against it appear dominant. Use the system before it is shut down, and legislators extend copyright term to 1,000 years retroactively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also seen scanned pages with fingers and other pages that are unreadable. In February of 2008 Google added the capability <a HREF="http://booksearch.blogspot.com/2008/02/from-mailbag-report-scanning-errors-in.html" rel="nofollow">to report scanning errors via a link on each page</a>.</p>
<p>At the time I sent an email to the Google Book Search team requesting the ability to report missing pages. They were agreeable and responsive, and now it is possible to report missing pages too.</p>
<p>There is a &#8220;Feedback&#8221; link for each page that is located near the upper right. If you click on it then you have two options for reporting: &#8220;Part of the page is unreadable&#8221; or &#8220;Missing page&#8221;. (The Feedback button location might vary based on browser/op-system. I am unsure. But the button should be visible somewhere.) </p>
<p>Google is building a remarkably powerful system, but the forces arrayed against it appear dominant. Use the system before it is shut down, and legislators extend copyright term to 1,000 years retroactively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tassia</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/finger-spam-in-google-scanned-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1145444</link>
		<dc:creator>Tassia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=29122#comment-1145444</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve run into this more than once, though I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d call it spam. Sometimes the page is rescanned, sometimes not. More frustrating are the blurry pages (usually a page caught in mid-turn) that aren&#039;t rescanned. 

At a guess, these &#039;glitches&#039; happen more often in books that were scanned early in the program or by a new hire, but I do wish there was some plan to go back and fix them. This is particularly necessary with rare books where the Google Books copy is the only copy for most of us. 

I should note, though, that I&#039;ve downloaded a LOT of Google Books and given the millions of pages scanned, I don&#039;t find it all that onerous to occasionally run across a gloved hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve run into this more than once, though I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d call it spam. Sometimes the page is rescanned, sometimes not. More frustrating are the blurry pages (usually a page caught in mid-turn) that aren&#8217;t rescanned. </p>
<p>At a guess, these &#8216;glitches&#8217; happen more often in books that were scanned early in the program or by a new hire, but I do wish there was some plan to go back and fix them. This is particularly necessary with rare books where the Google Books copy is the only copy for most of us. </p>
<p>I should note, though, that I&#8217;ve downloaded a LOT of Google Books and given the millions of pages scanned, I don&#8217;t find it all that onerous to occasionally run across a gloved hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 298/325 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-14 17:12:00 -->
