<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the iPhone flunk as a textbook-reader?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/09/06/how-much-should-students-rely-on-the-iphone-for-textbook-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/how-much-should-students-rely-on-the-iphone-for-textbook-reading/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:35:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Maseles</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/how-much-should-students-rely-on-the-iphone-for-textbook-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-1144669</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Maseles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/09/06/how-much-should-students-rely-on-the-iphone-for-textbook-reading/#comment-1144669</guid>
		<description>My take on the NYT article was that &quot;CouseSmart&quot; really took the lazy way to e-publish by simply putting PDFs out for iPhones-- the user has to scroll both up and down and side to side just to read a single page. The lovely picture of text on the iPhone was seductive, but misleading. Worse, &quot;CourseSmart&quot; (I put their name in ironic quotes because I don&#039;t think they&#039;re very smart about this at all) requires the user to download each page, creating a lag time of 9-13 seconds per download-- and if they want to go back to see a page they&#039;ve previously read, they have to download it again.

What I see is a company rushing a lousy product to market because, well, they want a product on the market. I hope the market rejects this deeply flawed product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on the NYT article was that &#8220;CouseSmart&#8221; really took the lazy way to e-publish by simply putting PDFs out for iPhones&#8211; the user has to scroll both up and down and side to side just to read a single page. The lovely picture of text on the iPhone was seductive, but misleading. Worse, &#8220;CourseSmart&#8221; (I put their name in ironic quotes because I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re very smart about this at all) requires the user to download each page, creating a lag time of 9-13 seconds per download&#8211; and if they want to go back to see a page they&#8217;ve previously read, they have to download it again.</p>
<p>What I see is a company rushing a lousy product to market because, well, they want a product on the market. I hope the market rejects this deeply flawed product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/how-much-should-students-rely-on-the-iphone-for-textbook-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-1144212</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 14:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/09/06/how-much-should-students-rely-on-the-iphone-for-textbook-reading/#comment-1144212</guid>
		<description>You say novels may be a different story. I disagree.

As a novelist who leans far toward OCD in terms of my control over page formatting, I must say that I&#039;m not at all happy with any of the current e-readers. I don&#039;t see any need for the user to be able to override any formatting choices made by the author/editor/compositor/whoever, or indeed, any advantage at all in doing so.

I&#039;m very concerned that the road we&#039;re on will take us to a place where there is simply no such thing as a bad word division or a bad page break, because all divisions and breaks are fine; a place where all the text in a given book will be identical, not just to all of the other text in the book, but to all text in any book; a place where white space ceases to exist, typeface choice ceases to carry meaning, and page layout is a meaningless anachronism.

A place, in short, where I&#039;m sorely afraid reading will cease to be a pleasure and become, instead, simply another chore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say novels may be a different story. I disagree.</p>
<p>As a novelist who leans far toward OCD in terms of my control over page formatting, I must say that I&#8217;m not at all happy with any of the current e-readers. I don&#8217;t see any need for the user to be able to override any formatting choices made by the author/editor/compositor/whoever, or indeed, any advantage at all in doing so.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very concerned that the road we&#8217;re on will take us to a place where there is simply no such thing as a bad word division or a bad page break, because all divisions and breaks are fine; a place where all the text in a given book will be identical, not just to all of the other text in the book, but to all text in any book; a place where white space ceases to exist, typeface choice ceases to carry meaning, and page layout is a meaningless anachronism.</p>
<p>A place, in short, where I&#8217;m sorely afraid reading will cease to be a pleasure and become, instead, simply another chore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 298/324 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 09:37:24 -->
