<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Ebooks&quot;, &quot;digital books&quot; &#8211; is there a difference?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/08/21/ebooks-digital-books-is-there-a-difference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/library/ebooks-digital-books-is-there-a-difference/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:35:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/library/ebooks-digital-books-is-there-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-1130792</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=27289#comment-1130792</guid>
		<description>Sounds to me like the libraries have decided that the word &quot;e-book&quot; carries a commercial connotation that is distasteful to them, and they are trying to disassociate themselves from crass commercialism.  For the only difference between &quot;e-book&quot; and &quot;digital book&quot; is semantics.

But as there are those of us who believe &quot;e-book&quot; is a fad-word, destined to be dropped when electronic files are not considered so unique, I don&#039;t mind if the library wants to call e-books by another name. &quot;Digital book&quot; is a bit long, IMO, but keep working on it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds to me like the libraries have decided that the word &#8220;e-book&#8221; carries a commercial connotation that is distasteful to them, and they are trying to disassociate themselves from crass commercialism.  For the only difference between &#8220;e-book&#8221; and &#8220;digital book&#8221; is semantics.</p>
<p>But as there are those of us who believe &#8220;e-book&#8221; is a fad-word, destined to be dropped when electronic files are not considered so unique, I don&#8217;t mind if the library wants to call e-books by another name. &#8220;Digital book&#8221; is a bit long, IMO, but keep working on it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 279/304 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 01:10:12 -->
