<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple pulls Google Voice apps from iPhone store</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/07/29/apple-pulls-google-voice-apps-from-iphone-store/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/apple-pulls-google-voice-apps-from-iphone-store/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meadows</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/apple-pulls-google-voice-apps-from-iphone-store/comment-page-1/#comment-1133618</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/07/29/apple-pulls-google-voice-apps-from-iphone-store/#comment-1133618</guid>
		<description>It turns out that AT&amp;T actually wasn&#039;t behind the rejection of the app. John Gruber&#039;s source who said it was &lt;a href=&quot;http://daringfireball.net/2009/08/google_voice_story_wrong&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;got it wrong&lt;/a&gt;, misinterpreting &lt;i&gt;his&lt;/i&gt; source&#039;s saying &quot;Apple hasn&#039;t rejected the app&quot; to mean that AT&amp;T had rather than that Apple was actually &quot;still considering&quot; it.

I&#039;ve updated the article with the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It turns out that AT&#038;T actually wasn&#8217;t behind the rejection of the app. John Gruber&#8217;s source who said it was <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2009/08/google_voice_story_wrong" rel="nofollow">got it wrong</a>, misinterpreting <i>his</i> source&#8217;s saying &#8220;Apple hasn&#8217;t rejected the app&#8221; to mean that AT&#038;T had rather than that Apple was actually &#8220;still considering&#8221; it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve updated the article with the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/apple-pulls-google-voice-apps-from-iphone-store/comment-page-1/#comment-1113199</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/07/29/apple-pulls-google-voice-apps-from-iphone-store/#comment-1113199</guid>
		<description>Great point, Stephen. I wonder, however, if Google will have some wireless service options that Apple won&#039;t. If nothing else, we know about Google&#039;s own interest in wireless. Thanks. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point, Stephen. I wonder, however, if Google will have some wireless service options that Apple won&#8217;t. If nothing else, we know about Google&#8217;s own interest in wireless. Thanks. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/chris-meadows/apple-pulls-google-voice-apps-from-iphone-store/comment-page-1/#comment-1113171</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/07/29/apple-pulls-google-voice-apps-from-iphone-store/#comment-1113171</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m none too fond of Apple&#039;s slow and opaque app approval process (especially for updates to existing apps), but I put this one down to AT&amp;T rather than Apple.  This ran afoul of the same business drivers that have thus far prevented legit 3rd-party &quot;tethering&quot; apps.

I doubt that *any* telco is going to be happy with allowing a phone-based service that competes directly with their own revenue streams (whether from texting, international calls, or tethering service).  If they can find a way to prevent it, they will.

The problem, in Apple&#039;s case, is that there&#039;s a single point of contact where AT&amp;T could apply the necessary pressure.  A more open ecosystem would make that harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m none too fond of Apple&#8217;s slow and opaque app approval process (especially for updates to existing apps), but I put this one down to AT&amp;T rather than Apple.  This ran afoul of the same business drivers that have thus far prevented legit 3rd-party &#8220;tethering&#8221; apps.</p>
<p>I doubt that *any* telco is going to be happy with allowing a phone-based service that competes directly with their own revenue streams (whether from texting, international calls, or tethering service).  If they can find a way to prevent it, they will.</p>
<p>The problem, in Apple&#8217;s case, is that there&#8217;s a single point of contact where AT&amp;T could apply the necessary pressure.  A more open ecosystem would make that harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 317/345 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 04:44:59 -->
