<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Book Search settlement in Japan &#8211; isn&#8217;t so simple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/07/22/google-book-search-settlement-in-japan-isnt-so-simple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/google-book-search-settlement-in-japan-isnt-so-simple/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Preece, Publisher</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/google-book-search-settlement-in-japan-isnt-so-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-1109285</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Preece, Publisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=25705#comment-1109285</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure things are different here in the US, just Google seems willing to roll over people. In the US, authors, not publishers, hold copyright. (The exception is in work-for-hire cases such as science fiction franchises, etc.). Google scanning in copyright but out of print books is arguably a copyright violation here as well. Certainly their selling scanned books without copyright-holder permission is a violation. A big part of the problem, in the US as in Japan, is that it&#039;s difficult for anyone but a publisher to determine if a book is in print or out of print. With POD, and eBooks, it becomes even more difficult.

I am conflicted on Google scanning, but I don&#039;t think differences in laws are at the basis of the problem.

Rob Preece
Publisher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure things are different here in the US, just Google seems willing to roll over people. In the US, authors, not publishers, hold copyright. (The exception is in work-for-hire cases such as science fiction franchises, etc.). Google scanning in copyright but out of print books is arguably a copyright violation here as well. Certainly their selling scanned books without copyright-holder permission is a violation. A big part of the problem, in the US as in Japan, is that it&#8217;s difficult for anyone but a publisher to determine if a book is in print or out of print. With POD, and eBooks, it becomes even more difficult.</p>
<p>I am conflicted on Google scanning, but I don&#8217;t think differences in laws are at the basis of the problem.</p>
<p>Rob Preece<br />
Publisher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 279/306 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 04:33:49 -->
