Comments on: CrunchGear’s anti-netbook guide to netbooks: Why e-bookers should laugh it off http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/crunchgears-anti-netbook-guide-to-netbooks-why-e-bookers-should-laugh-it-off/ News & views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:23:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Andrew http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/crunchgears-anti-netbook-guide-to-netbooks-why-e-bookers-should-laugh-it-off/comment-page-1/#comment-1146470 Andrew Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:34:23 +0000 http://www.teleread.org/2009/07/17/crunchgears-anti-netbook-guide-to-netbooks-why-e-bookers-should-laugh-it-off/#comment-1146470 I think more fundamentally the problem is that they do not understand what netbook means. I think more fundamentally the problem is that they do not understand what netbook means.

]]> By: David Rothman http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/crunchgears-anti-netbook-guide-to-netbooks-why-e-bookers-should-laugh-it-off/comment-page-1/#comment-1106273 David Rothman Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:41:05 +0000 http://www.teleread.org/2009/07/17/crunchgears-anti-netbook-guide-to-netbooks-why-e-bookers-should-laugh-it-off/#comment-1106273 Pond, you're <em>very</em> charitable. But who knows? Thanks for your thoughts. David Pond, you’re very charitable. But who knows? Thanks for your thoughts. David

]]> By: pond http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/crunchgears-anti-netbook-guide-to-netbooks-why-e-bookers-should-laugh-it-off/comment-page-1/#comment-1105784 pond Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:31:43 +0000 http://www.teleread.org/2009/07/17/crunchgears-anti-netbook-guide-to-netbooks-why-e-bookers-should-laugh-it-off/#comment-1105784 Maybe it's satire. You know, John C Dvorak will occasionally (often? always?) write in a deliberately rude, offensive tone, because he knows that if he gets readers mad enough, they will write letters to the editor (or give him page hits) which will prove to his boss that his stuff is worth the big bucks they pay him. This article struck me as following that philosophy. Maybe it’s satire. You know, John C Dvorak will occasionally (often? always?) write in a deliberately rude, offensive tone, because he knows that if he gets readers mad enough, they will write letters to the editor (or give him page hits) which will prove to his boss that his stuff is worth the big bucks they pay him.

This article struck me as following that philosophy.

]]>