<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could PixelQi competition be partly why E Ink sold out to PixelQi at a bargain price?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/06/08/could-pixelqi-competition-be-partly-why-e-ink-sold-out-to-pixelqi-at-a-bargain-price/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/could-pixelqi-competition-be-partly-why-e-ink-sold-out-to-pixelqi-at-a-bargain-price/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/could-pixelqi-competition-be-partly-why-e-ink-sold-out-to-pixelqi-at-a-bargain-price/comment-page-1/#comment-1076630</link>
		<dc:creator>Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/08/could-pixelqi-competition-be-partly-why-e-ink-sold-out-to-pixelqi-at-a-bargain-price/#comment-1076630</guid>
		<description>I thing the apt comparison is monotone laser printers versus color ink jet printers. If all you need is black and white, for instance to print business papers, the laser printer does that better: more contrast, crisper edges and detail, faster printing, no wavy paper from wet ink in dark parts of the page, no runny ink when it gets wet.

If the Kindle is mostly used to read mass market paperback, those are black and white to begin with. They&#039;re going to be black and white even on a color e-book device. You get your color fix from the covers on the screen if you buy your books from a PC rather than from Whispernet.

Color would be great if there were no trade-offs, but there will be. Price, lower contrast for monochrome pages, and who knows what else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thing the apt comparison is monotone laser printers versus color ink jet printers. If all you need is black and white, for instance to print business papers, the laser printer does that better: more contrast, crisper edges and detail, faster printing, no wavy paper from wet ink in dark parts of the page, no runny ink when it gets wet.</p>
<p>If the Kindle is mostly used to read mass market paperback, those are black and white to begin with. They&#8217;re going to be black and white even on a color e-book device. You get your color fix from the covers on the screen if you buy your books from a PC rather than from Whispernet.</p>
<p>Color would be great if there were no trade-offs, but there will be. Price, lower contrast for monochrome pages, and who knows what else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Janssen</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/could-pixelqi-competition-be-partly-why-e-ink-sold-out-to-pixelqi-at-a-bargain-price/comment-page-1/#comment-1075133</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Janssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/08/could-pixelqi-competition-be-partly-why-e-ink-sold-out-to-pixelqi-at-a-bargain-price/#comment-1075133</guid>
		<description>The headline reads, &quot;sold out to PixelQi&quot;.  I think you meant to write, &quot;PVI&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The headline reads, &#8220;sold out to PixelQi&#8221;.  I think you meant to write, &#8220;PVI&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheRealBillC</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/could-pixelqi-competition-be-partly-why-e-ink-sold-out-to-pixelqi-at-a-bargain-price/comment-page-1/#comment-1074907</link>
		<dc:creator>TheRealBillC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/08/could-pixelqi-competition-be-partly-why-e-ink-sold-out-to-pixelqi-at-a-bargain-price/#comment-1074907</guid>
		<description>PixelQi is still in prototype mode, so talk of a $200 ereader device from some vendor buying screen tech from them, while possible, is still premature. PixelQi has said they are going to manufacture the screens, not devices. They still have not mentioned any device makers that have signed any agreements with them to produce an e reader, or any other device. While I have every confidence that is their goal, and there is sufficient interest in the market place to make it a reality, everything being said today is pure speculation based on the very meager information PixelQi has put out so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PixelQi is still in prototype mode, so talk of a $200 ereader device from some vendor buying screen tech from them, while possible, is still premature. PixelQi has said they are going to manufacture the screens, not devices. They still have not mentioned any device makers that have signed any agreements with them to produce an e reader, or any other device. While I have every confidence that is their goal, and there is sufficient interest in the market place to make it a reality, everything being said today is pure speculation based on the very meager information PixelQi has put out so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/could-pixelqi-competition-be-partly-why-e-ink-sold-out-to-pixelqi-at-a-bargain-price/comment-page-1/#comment-1074864</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/08/could-pixelqi-competition-be-partly-why-e-ink-sold-out-to-pixelqi-at-a-bargain-price/#comment-1074864</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Young children respond much better to color than to simple black and white, judging from the experiences that Jon Noring and colleagues had when evaluating hardware years ago.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh... Old children respond better to color over B&amp;W, too.  And young adults.  And old adults.  And whoever&#039;s left!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Young children respond much better to color than to simple black and white, judging from the experiences that Jon Noring and colleagues had when evaluating hardware years ago.</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh&#8230; Old children respond better to color over B&#038;W, too.  And young adults.  And old adults.  And whoever&#8217;s left!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pond</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/could-pixelqi-competition-be-partly-why-e-ink-sold-out-to-pixelqi-at-a-bargain-price/comment-page-1/#comment-1074794</link>
		<dc:creator>pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/08/could-pixelqi-competition-be-partly-why-e-ink-sold-out-to-pixelqi-at-a-bargain-price/#comment-1074794</guid>
		<description>That $200 figure comes from the Time magazine article, one that is unfortunately riddled with errors. In the video interview with Mary Lou Jepsen, she says it was a &#039;misunderstanding&#039; and that her company is aiming at $200 as the price for the whole netbook including the screen. A small correction that makes the XO2&#039;s goal of an &#039;eventual&#039; $75 double-screen model somewhat more feasible.

As for Amazon, I have no doubt whatsoever that color screens are on their radar screens. I&#039;m a bit surprised they don&#039;t have an lcd-based color, cheaper Kindle already; all I can surmise is that Bezos &amp; co. have determined that (so far) eink screens are so much more readable that it&#039;s worth it to stick in that space. On the other hand, we have a raft of netbooks and touchbooks or &#039;smartbooks&#039; coming, many based on low-power ARM cpus, designed with telcos in mind. Hook up a $99 netbook and carrier subscription with whispersync, and you have a killer kindle-reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That $200 figure comes from the Time magazine article, one that is unfortunately riddled with errors. In the video interview with Mary Lou Jepsen, she says it was a &#8216;misunderstanding&#8217; and that her company is aiming at $200 as the price for the whole netbook including the screen. A small correction that makes the XO2&#8242;s goal of an &#8216;eventual&#8217; $75 double-screen model somewhat more feasible.</p>
<p>As for Amazon, I have no doubt whatsoever that color screens are on their radar screens. I&#8217;m a bit surprised they don&#8217;t have an lcd-based color, cheaper Kindle already; all I can surmise is that Bezos &amp; co. have determined that (so far) eink screens are so much more readable that it&#8217;s worth it to stick in that space. On the other hand, we have a raft of netbooks and touchbooks or &#8216;smartbooks&#8217; coming, many based on low-power ARM cpus, designed with telcos in mind. Hook up a $99 netbook and carrier subscription with whispersync, and you have a killer kindle-reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 355/380 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 12:59:56 -->
