<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New images of the Pixel Qi display</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/06/02/22891/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/luyu/22891/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:39:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meadows</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/luyu/22891/comment-page-1/#comment-1071938</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22891#comment-1071938</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Greg M:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;How many people actually read whole, full length ebooks sitting at their desktop? My guess is not many.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
But we&#039;re not not talking about &lt;i&gt;desktops&lt;/i&gt; here. In the context of the original post, we are talking about netbooks optimized for e-book reading, which is the entire purpose of the Pixel Qi display.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Greg M:</b><br />
<blockquote>How many people actually read whole, full length ebooks sitting at their desktop? My guess is not many.</p></blockquote>
<p>But we&#8217;re not not talking about <i>desktops</i> here. In the context of the original post, we are talking about netbooks optimized for e-book reading, which is the entire purpose of the Pixel Qi display.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg M.</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/luyu/22891/comment-page-1/#comment-1071927</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22891#comment-1071927</guid>
		<description>Up until February of this year I was still on Windows and had the ability to encrypted Mobipocket, Microsoft Reader, Adobe, and eReader; funny thing, however, I never did so.  Out of a hundred plus ebooks I&#039;ve read over the years, not one has been done on a desktop or laptop.  The fact that a Mac can&#039;t read most encrypted  ebooks is completely moot; even if available, it would be a feature never used. 

How many people actually read whole, full length ebooks sitting at their desktop?  My guess is not many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up until February of this year I was still on Windows and had the ability to encrypted Mobipocket, Microsoft Reader, Adobe, and eReader; funny thing, however, I never did so.  Out of a hundred plus ebooks I&#8217;ve read over the years, not one has been done on a desktop or laptop.  The fact that a Mac can&#8217;t read most encrypted  ebooks is completely moot; even if available, it would be a feature never used. </p>
<p>How many people actually read whole, full length ebooks sitting at their desktop?  My guess is not many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meadows</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/luyu/22891/comment-page-1/#comment-1071884</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22891#comment-1071884</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Greg M:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;Now, an ereader is not as critical as a system monitoring life support, but wouldn’t you really rather have critical (or even non-critical) systems running a more reliable OS like Unix or Linux.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not if I want to be able to read encrypted MobiPocket e-books without illegally breaking the encryption. (Not that I particularly do, since I don&#039;t buy in that format, but there will be others who bought those books in the past when they had something that read them and for whom being able to read them will factor heavily into their considerations as to what platform to buy in the future.) There&#039;s no MobiPocket client for &quot;Unix or Linux,&quot; and there probably will never be.

Of course, since you&#039;re on a Mac (for which there is no Mobi client either), &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; can&#039;t read encrypted MobiPocket e-books without illegally breaking the encryption, so I guess you wouldn&#039;t miss what you&#039;ve never had. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Greg M:</b><br />
<blockquote>Now, an ereader is not as critical as a system monitoring life support, but wouldn’t you really rather have critical (or even non-critical) systems running a more reliable OS like Unix or Linux.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not if I want to be able to read encrypted MobiPocket e-books without illegally breaking the encryption. (Not that I particularly do, since I don&#8217;t buy in that format, but there will be others who bought those books in the past when they had something that read them and for whom being able to read them will factor heavily into their considerations as to what platform to buy in the future.) There&#8217;s no MobiPocket client for &#8220;Unix or Linux,&#8221; and there probably will never be.</p>
<p>Of course, since you&#8217;re on a Mac (for which there is no Mobi client either), <i>you</i> can&#8217;t read encrypted MobiPocket e-books without illegally breaking the encryption, so I guess you wouldn&#8217;t miss what you&#8217;ve never had. <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Hartsock</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/luyu/22891/comment-page-1/#comment-1071515</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Hartsock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22891#comment-1071515</guid>
		<description>Pond,

The old Rocket eBook of mine got about 22 hours of reading at 40% backlight, with a Ni-MH battery. Ten years later it gets 18-20. So 40 hours does not seem unreasonable in eInk mode (relective mode). If the battery was the same size as the rather big battery in my Rocket I might expect 40 hours using the backlight. But of course the battery will not be anywhere near that size.

I wish I knew what these display panels will cost to manufacture once full scale production starts. You can buy a 19-21 inch LED monitor for $200 or less so that gives us some sort of upper limit. Still I think $75 is something to shoot for without knowing much about production costs.

The cool thing here is eReaders are suddenly blossoming with many units out or soon to be available. That is good. The pricing is still bad. But with the competition ramping up there should be pressure to drive the price down in the next few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pond,</p>
<p>The old Rocket eBook of mine got about 22 hours of reading at 40% backlight, with a Ni-MH battery. Ten years later it gets 18-20. So 40 hours does not seem unreasonable in eInk mode (relective mode). If the battery was the same size as the rather big battery in my Rocket I might expect 40 hours using the backlight. But of course the battery will not be anywhere near that size.</p>
<p>I wish I knew what these display panels will cost to manufacture once full scale production starts. You can buy a 19-21 inch LED monitor for $200 or less so that gives us some sort of upper limit. Still I think $75 is something to shoot for without knowing much about production costs.</p>
<p>The cool thing here is eReaders are suddenly blossoming with many units out or soon to be available. That is good. The pricing is still bad. But with the competition ramping up there should be pressure to drive the price down in the next few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pond</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/luyu/22891/comment-page-1/#comment-1071216</link>
		<dc:creator>pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22891#comment-1071216</guid>
		<description>That Time piece is a weird one, since it tells us that disaffected members of OLPC went on to invent Eink. Oh really? That said, it seems more likely the &#039;under $200&#039; is accurate.

Kind of puts into perspective Negroponte&#039;s boast that XO2 will have 2 of these screens, with touch on both, plus power supply, motherboard, CPU, RAM, storage ... for $75.

We have to hope that with scale the 3Qi screens will come down a lot farther, fast. Don&#039;t know what the production cost of a typical netbook LCD screen is. But I&#039;d imagine that some people would pay extra for the advertised &#039;up to 40 hours battery life!&#039; that they might claim if you had the screen on epaper mode, and never turned the page!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Time piece is a weird one, since it tells us that disaffected members of OLPC went on to invent Eink. Oh really? That said, it seems more likely the &#8216;under $200&#8242; is accurate.</p>
<p>Kind of puts into perspective Negroponte&#8217;s boast that XO2 will have 2 of these screens, with touch on both, plus power supply, motherboard, CPU, RAM, storage &#8230; for $75.</p>
<p>We have to hope that with scale the 3Qi screens will come down a lot farther, fast. Don&#8217;t know what the production cost of a typical netbook LCD screen is. But I&#8217;d imagine that some people would pay extra for the advertised &#8216;up to 40 hours battery life!&#8217; that they might claim if you had the screen on epaper mode, and never turned the page!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix Torres</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/luyu/22891/comment-page-1/#comment-1071214</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix Torres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22891#comment-1071214</guid>
		<description>It shows, Greg, it shows...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It shows, Greg, it shows&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg M.</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/luyu/22891/comment-page-1/#comment-1071209</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22891#comment-1071209</guid>
		<description>As for the Windows OS, let me recount a story from the Security Now Podcast.

There was a hospital that hooked up some kind of life support monitoring system to a Windows XP system.  It was configured for automatic updates and it rebooted during the middle of an operation.  The hospital SysAdmin then disabled automatic updates for all Windows systems in his network.  And then came the malware from an unpatched system with a connection to the internet.

Now, an ereader is not as critical as a system monitoring life support, but wouldn&#039;t you really rather have critical (or even non-critical) systems running a more reliable OS like Unix or Linux.  

BTW, I&#039;m on a Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the Windows OS, let me recount a story from the Security Now Podcast.</p>
<p>There was a hospital that hooked up some kind of life support monitoring system to a Windows XP system.  It was configured for automatic updates and it rebooted during the middle of an operation.  The hospital SysAdmin then disabled automatic updates for all Windows systems in his network.  And then came the malware from an unpatched system with a connection to the internet.</p>
<p>Now, an ereader is not as critical as a system monitoring life support, but wouldn&#8217;t you really rather have critical (or even non-critical) systems running a more reliable OS like Unix or Linux.  </p>
<p>BTW, I&#8217;m on a Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moriah Jovan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/luyu/22891/comment-page-1/#comment-1071088</link>
		<dc:creator>Moriah Jovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22891#comment-1071088</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Outdated or not, Windows still has readers for more e-book formats than any other OS.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Every computer I have has Windoze because I need it to work; I wouldn&#039;t purchase another OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Outdated or not, Windows still has readers for more e-book formats than any other OS.</p></blockquote>
<p>Every computer I have has Windoze because I need it to work; I wouldn&#8217;t purchase another OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meadows</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/luyu/22891/comment-page-1/#comment-1070961</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22891#comment-1070961</guid>
		<description>Outdated or not, Windows still has readers for more e-book formats than any other OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outdated or not, Windows still has readers for more e-book formats than any other OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 435/459 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-14 04:07:32 -->
