<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Donated books?  Well, maybe not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/06/01/donated-books-well-maybe-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/donated-books-well-maybe-not/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:47:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branko Collin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/donated-books-well-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1071002</link>
		<dc:creator>Branko Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22864#comment-1071002</guid>
		<description>Only 50% being pulped? They must be doing something right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 50% being pulped? They must be doing something right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/donated-books-well-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1070542</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22864#comment-1070542</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reminded of when someone at Half Price Books told me, that in addition to the 3-4 books of mine they were willing to buy, they&#039;d take the dozen or so others for &#039;recycling.&#039; Since I&#039;d seen a copy of one of the books to be &#039;recycled&#039; on their shelves, I concluded that recycling really meant being sent to another of their stores for sale. I declined their offer and gave the books away.

In the case of Book Patrol, I suspect that the 25% going to charities are those of only marginal value, while the remaining 24% that they sell online are the most valuable. Cream skimming rather than recycling.

I&#039;d love to see an organization develop that would transport entire shipping containers of the more useful books to poorer countries, where they&#039;d be given to vendors to sell at low prices. It&#039;d do a lot more good than giving kids tiny green computers that cost more than their parents earn in six months.

Why the shipping containers? In the 1980s, I shipped hundreds of books to schools in Bangladesh, India and Zambia at a special bulk rate for books that was about 50 cents a pound. Now the post office tells me I can&#039;t do that, that I have to use something like global priority mail. Shipping costs about 10 times the old price and often more than the new price of a book.

Adding good books to relief shipments and sending them by the container load would get them cheaply to countries that have too few books.

At present, the only way I know to get books overseas cheaply is to send them to someone with a U.S. military APO address in the county. Those rates are the same is shipping inside the U.S. and include a &#039;media rate&#039; that&#039;s not too costly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reminded of when someone at Half Price Books told me, that in addition to the 3-4 books of mine they were willing to buy, they&#8217;d take the dozen or so others for &#8216;recycling.&#8217; Since I&#8217;d seen a copy of one of the books to be &#8216;recycled&#8217; on their shelves, I concluded that recycling really meant being sent to another of their stores for sale. I declined their offer and gave the books away.</p>
<p>In the case of Book Patrol, I suspect that the 25% going to charities are those of only marginal value, while the remaining 24% that they sell online are the most valuable. Cream skimming rather than recycling.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see an organization develop that would transport entire shipping containers of the more useful books to poorer countries, where they&#8217;d be given to vendors to sell at low prices. It&#8217;d do a lot more good than giving kids tiny green computers that cost more than their parents earn in six months.</p>
<p>Why the shipping containers? In the 1980s, I shipped hundreds of books to schools in Bangladesh, India and Zambia at a special bulk rate for books that was about 50 cents a pound. Now the post office tells me I can&#8217;t do that, that I have to use something like global priority mail. Shipping costs about 10 times the old price and often more than the new price of a book.</p>
<p>Adding good books to relief shipments and sending them by the container load would get them cheaply to countries that have too few books.</p>
<p>At present, the only way I know to get books overseas cheaply is to send them to someone with a U.S. military APO address in the county. Those rates are the same is shipping inside the U.S. and include a &#8216;media rate&#8217; that&#8217;s not too costly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 298/322 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-14 12:54:46 -->
