Comments on: ‘Apple rejects a new e-book reader because it can download the Kama Sutra’

By: r4i

r4i — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:34:48 +0000

It will be interesting to see if they provide the further correspondence with Apple

By: David Rothman

David Rothman — Sun, 24 May 2009 16:40:16 +0000

Many thanks for the link, Jim. And on another topic, I’d love for you or colleagues at Adobe to offer thoughts on my post about Adobe Digital Editions. I’m hoping ADE will succeed, but I think a major redesign is called for. Any reactions to that should go in the comment area associated with the ADE post. Or I can post Adobe comments to the main part of the blog. I think the feedback from me and other TeleBlog regulars will benefit Adobe and other vendors. As you can see from my thoughts about the (apparent) Adobe module in the Sony eBook Library, I think Adobe is doing some things very well. I’d like to see the same approach show up in ADE.

Thanks,
David

By: Jim Lester

Jim Lester — Sun, 24 May 2009 16:25:00 +0000

FYI, Eucalyptus is now available on the ITMS.
The developer just provided the brief announcement
http://blog.th.ingsmadeoutofotherthin.gs/

It will be interesting to see if they provide the further correspondence with Apple

By: David Rothman

David Rothman — Sat, 23 May 2009 21:08:40 +0000

Thanks for your thoughts, Sept and Tracy. The kids will survive. Tracy’s library comparison is apt—it isn’t as if libraries here in the States are porn centers, but they do carry books like Kuma Sutra as part of larger general collections. It is art, not sleaze. Beyond that, although school kids use TeleRead for research, we also need to consider that the typical readers are much older and will be interested in censorship controversies. Our goal here is to be more commonsensical than the Apple App store.

As for libraries outside the States, I suspect that American ones are between those in Scandinavia and those in, say, Moslem countries. In fact, I’m glad we’re having this discussion. What to do about global libraries deemed offensive to certain societies? How much filtering, if any? No easy answers here.

Thanks,
David

By: Tracy Falbe

Tracy Falbe — Sat, 23 May 2009 20:06:51 +0000

I’m sure that school children would love the illustration with this article. Kids comb libraries for that sort of stuff. Don’t worry about it.

By: Septimus Severus

Septimus Severus — Fri, 22 May 2009 22:08:04 +0000

I vaguely recall that David Rothman once said that school children used TeleRead to perform research, and hence articles and comments at TeleRead should be circumspect regarding traditional areas of taboo. For example, words like “fuck” were to be avoided or minimized. But based on the illustration accompanying this article my memory is faulty, or the policy has changed. Is there any policy now?

By: pond

pond — Fri, 22 May 2009 20:38:59 +0000

The very same book can also be viewed on the built-in web browser inside the iPhone. Quite staggeringly stupid. Apparently all these arguments have been used by the Eucalyptus developers to the iPhone Board of Censors, all to no avail.

Here we have the finest reason to loathe all monopolies when it comes to books, information, and the written word.

By: Greg M.

Greg M. — Fri, 22 May 2009 17:27:11 +0000

Who gets to decide what is offensive content? What if I wanted to reject religious texts like the Torah, the Bible, the Koran, or the Book or Mormon? Imagine the howls of extrication if the scripture were rejected for offensive content.

By: Chris Meadows

Chris Meadows — Fri, 22 May 2009 16:51:19 +0000

Just like that Twitter app whose update was blocked because some users said the F-word, and the Nine Inch Nails app that was blocked for an explicit song that, it later turned out, wasn’t even accessible via the upgrade.

Are Apple’s approval crew indulging in controlled substances? For crying out loud.