<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wacky idea: Punish New York Times readers for spending too much time with the NYT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/05/16/wacky-idea-punish-new-york-times-readers-for-spending-too-much-time-with-the-nyt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/newspapers/wacky-idea-punish-new-york-times-readers-for-spending-too-much-time-with-the-nyt/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pastore</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/newspapers/wacky-idea-punish-new-york-times-readers-for-spending-too-much-time-with-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1059393</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pastore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 16:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/16/wacky-idea-punish-new-york-times-readers-for-spending-too-much-time-with-the-nyt/#comment-1059393</guid>
		<description>File the New York Observer story under the category:

==Re-Arranging Deck Chairs on the Titanic.==

The New York Times offers a valuable product. 

Unfortunately, I don&#039;t believe that either of these two plans -- as reported in the New York Observer -- will solve the problem of how to make enough money from  that product. The NYT lost about 75 million dollars in the first three months of 2009; and they may lose the same amount in the second quarter. That&#039;s a lot of 20-cent articles to sell. 

David (Rothman) is on the right track by suggesting that businesses should pay for specialized articles. I think that even more needs to done. 

My plan to save the Times is more ambitious and more risky than the Times&#039;s plans. The Times might survive if they re-invent themselves: they are now primarily a newspaper business, they must become an information business. 

&lt;strong&gt;Print 2.0: Can Ebooks Save the New York Times ?&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://epublishersweekly.blogspot.com/2009/04/print-20-can-ebooks-save-new-york-times.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://epublishersweekly.blogspot.com/2009/04/print-20-can-ebooks-save-new-york-times.html&lt;/a&gt;

If the new information business flounders, then going non-profit, like the BBC, may be the best hope to preserve quality news reporting. 

If I were losing 25 million dollars every month, I would probably be inspired to begin a new approach immediately. I&#039;d leave the deck chairs alone, and start building the lifeboats.

Michael Pastore
50 Benefits of Ebooks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>File the New York Observer story under the category:</p>
<p>==Re-Arranging Deck Chairs on the Titanic.==</p>
<p>The New York Times offers a valuable product. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t believe that either of these two plans &#8212; as reported in the New York Observer &#8212; will solve the problem of how to make enough money from  that product. The NYT lost about 75 million dollars in the first three months of 2009; and they may lose the same amount in the second quarter. That&#8217;s a lot of 20-cent articles to sell. </p>
<p>David (Rothman) is on the right track by suggesting that businesses should pay for specialized articles. I think that even more needs to done. </p>
<p>My plan to save the Times is more ambitious and more risky than the Times&#8217;s plans. The Times might survive if they re-invent themselves: they are now primarily a newspaper business, they must become an information business. </p>
<p><strong>Print 2.0: Can Ebooks Save the New York Times ?</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://epublishersweekly.blogspot.com/2009/04/print-20-can-ebooks-save-new-york-times.html" rel="nofollow">http://epublishersweekly.blogspot.com/2009/04/print-20-can-ebooks-save-new-york-times.html</a></p>
<p>If the new information business flounders, then going non-profit, like the BBC, may be the best hope to preserve quality news reporting. </p>
<p>If I were losing 25 million dollars every month, I would probably be inspired to begin a new approach immediately. I&#8217;d leave the deck chairs alone, and start building the lifeboats.</p>
<p>Michael Pastore<br />
50 Benefits of Ebooks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisbates</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/newspapers/wacky-idea-punish-new-york-times-readers-for-spending-too-much-time-with-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1059212</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisbates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 08:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/16/wacky-idea-punish-new-york-times-readers-for-spending-too-much-time-with-the-nyt/#comment-1059212</guid>
		<description>Wow, what a great way to fast-track the destruction of your business.

I agree with Jarvis&#039;s &#039;link economy&#039; model. Obviously NYT doesn&#039;t.

NYT = New York Times .... or Not Your Thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what a great way to fast-track the destruction of your business.</p>
<p>I agree with Jarvis&#8217;s &#8216;link economy&#8217; model. Obviously NYT doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>NYT = New York Times &#8230;. or Not Your Thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 298/322 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 14:17:38 -->
